Knowledge, attitudes and practices on prevention and control of high-consequence infectious diseases and critical care among intensive care personnel in Rwanda: a cross-sectional survey

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
L. Schneider , M. Umutoni , V. Ndagijimana , M. Abdelrhman , T. Cronen , M. Nkeshimana , P. Banguti , C. Karamira , E. Seruyange , T. Piening , A. Phuti , T. Paerisch , F. Mockenhaupt , C. Mambo Muvunyi , M. Gertler , E. Rwagasore
{"title":"Knowledge, attitudes and practices on prevention and control of high-consequence infectious diseases and critical care among intensive care personnel in Rwanda: a cross-sectional survey","authors":"L. Schneider ,&nbsp;M. Umutoni ,&nbsp;V. Ndagijimana ,&nbsp;M. Abdelrhman ,&nbsp;T. Cronen ,&nbsp;M. Nkeshimana ,&nbsp;P. Banguti ,&nbsp;C. Karamira ,&nbsp;E. Seruyange ,&nbsp;T. Piening ,&nbsp;A. Phuti ,&nbsp;T. Paerisch ,&nbsp;F. Mockenhaupt ,&nbsp;C. Mambo Muvunyi ,&nbsp;M. Gertler ,&nbsp;E. Rwagasore","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Intensive care personnel in countries prone to outbreaks of high-consequence infectious diseases (HCIDs), such as Ebola virus disease, stand at the forefront of caring for affected patients. This study describes the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of intensive care personnel in Rwanda on the management and infection prevention and control (IPC) of HCIDs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey was carried out among staff working in the 4 operational intensive care units in September 2022. The self-administered questionnaire collected information on participants' background and their KAP on critical care (CC), HCIDs and IPC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 107 participants, 67 (62.6%) had less than 4 years' work experience in CC. 41 (38.3%) of them had attended trainings on IPC since 2020. In univariate analyses, a higher knowledge score was associated with being a physician, years of working in CC and differed by hospital. A large proportion perceived their knowledge on CC as good or very good (58.0%) and their everyday risk of acquiring an infection as at least high (48.6%). Overall, 72.9% reported compliance with hand hygiene measures. However, around a quarter of participants reported rarely or never avoiding recapping of needles or never or rarely taking additional precautions during aerosol-generating procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Staff had a moderate knowledge base and might benefit from continuous learning on CC and HCIDs. The perception of high risk of infection at work stands in contrast with lack of compliance with basic IPC practices which should be reinforced to avoid preventable and potentially fatal infections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"6 4","pages":"Article 100398"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Intensive care personnel in countries prone to outbreaks of high-consequence infectious diseases (HCIDs), such as Ebola virus disease, stand at the forefront of caring for affected patients. This study describes the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of intensive care personnel in Rwanda on the management and infection prevention and control (IPC) of HCIDs.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was carried out among staff working in the 4 operational intensive care units in September 2022. The self-administered questionnaire collected information on participants' background and their KAP on critical care (CC), HCIDs and IPC.

Results

Of the 107 participants, 67 (62.6%) had less than 4 years' work experience in CC. 41 (38.3%) of them had attended trainings on IPC since 2020. In univariate analyses, a higher knowledge score was associated with being a physician, years of working in CC and differed by hospital. A large proportion perceived their knowledge on CC as good or very good (58.0%) and their everyday risk of acquiring an infection as at least high (48.6%). Overall, 72.9% reported compliance with hand hygiene measures. However, around a quarter of participants reported rarely or never avoiding recapping of needles or never or rarely taking additional precautions during aerosol-generating procedures.

Conclusions

Staff had a moderate knowledge base and might benefit from continuous learning on CC and HCIDs. The perception of high risk of infection at work stands in contrast with lack of compliance with basic IPC practices which should be reinforced to avoid preventable and potentially fatal infections.
卢旺达重症监护人员对高危传染病防控和重症监护的认识、态度和做法:横断面调查
引言在埃博拉病毒病等高致病性传染病(HCID)容易爆发的国家,重症监护人员站在护理受影响病人的最前沿。本研究描述了卢旺达重症监护人员对 HCIDs 的管理和感染预防与控制 (IPC) 的知识、态度和实践 (KAP)。方法:2022 年 9 月,对在 4 个运行中的重症监护病房工作的人员进行了横断面调查。结果 在 107 名参与者中,67 人(62.6%)拥有少于 4 年的重症监护工作经验。其中 41 人(38.3%)自 2020 年以来参加过 IPC 培训。在单变量分析中,较高的知识得分与医生身份、在社区卫生中心的工作年限有关,并因医院而异。很大一部分人认为他们对 CC 的了解程度为良好或非常好(58.0%),而他们日常感染的风险至少为高(48.6%)。总体而言,72.9%的参与者表示遵守了手部卫生措施。然而,约四分之一的参与者表示很少或从未避免重新盖针,或从未或很少在产生气溶胶的程序中采取额外的预防措施。他们认为工作场所感染的风险很高,但却不遵守基本的 IPC 操作规范,而这些规范应得到加强,以避免可预防的、可能致命的感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信