Circulating miRNA profiles as predictive biomarkers for aneurysm healing following endovascular treatment: a prospective study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Santhosh Arul, Erik Jassen, Jennifer Ayers-Ringler, Oana Madalina Mereuta, Yigit Can Senol, Atakan Orscelik, Sherief Ghozy, Waleed Brinjikji, David F Kallmes, Ramanathan Kadirvel
{"title":"Circulating miRNA profiles as predictive biomarkers for aneurysm healing following endovascular treatment: a prospective study.","authors":"Santhosh Arul, Erik Jassen, Jennifer Ayers-Ringler, Oana Madalina Mereuta, Yigit Can Senol, Atakan Orscelik, Sherief Ghozy, Waleed Brinjikji, David F Kallmes, Ramanathan Kadirvel","doi":"10.1177/15910199241298321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aneurysm treatments are crucial to minimize the rupture risk. The underlying molecular processes mediating cellular remodeling, endothelialization, and aneurysm healing following endovascular treatment are poorly understood. The current study aims to explore circulating miRNA as a treatment and outcome-associated biomarkers in patients undergoing endovascular treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing endovascular interventions for unruptured intracranial aneurysms, using either flow diverter placement or coil embolization, were enrolled. Blood samples were collected before the intervention and during a follow-up period between 6 and 18 months. Total mRNA/miRNA was isolated from plasma, followed by RNA-seq analysis. Gene Ontology analysis was used to identify pathways linked to altered miRNA expression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients participated, with 13 (56.5%) undergoing flow diversion and 10 (43.5%) coil embolization. The median follow-up sample collection time was 10.70 months (SEM ± 1.32). No significant differences in angiographic occlusion were noted between intervention groups. Differentially expressed miRNAs were not identified between groups at baseline. However, at follow-up, 39 miRNAs were upregulated and 41 were downregulated, independent of intervention. Notably, three miRNAs (miR-4746-5p, miR-4685-3p, and miR-490-3p) were downregulated in the flow diversion group compared to the coil embolization group. Bioinformatics analysis revealed associations with upregulated fluid shear stress, p53, adherens junction pathways, along with downregulated apoptosis pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that fluid shear stress and apoptosis may influence aneurysm healing or thromboembolic events in flow diverter-treated patients. Further research is warranted to elucidate the functional significance of these findings in treatment outcomes, providing valuable insights for improved patient care in intracranial aneurysm management.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241298321"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241298321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Aneurysm treatments are crucial to minimize the rupture risk. The underlying molecular processes mediating cellular remodeling, endothelialization, and aneurysm healing following endovascular treatment are poorly understood. The current study aims to explore circulating miRNA as a treatment and outcome-associated biomarkers in patients undergoing endovascular treatment.

Methods: Patients undergoing endovascular interventions for unruptured intracranial aneurysms, using either flow diverter placement or coil embolization, were enrolled. Blood samples were collected before the intervention and during a follow-up period between 6 and 18 months. Total mRNA/miRNA was isolated from plasma, followed by RNA-seq analysis. Gene Ontology analysis was used to identify pathways linked to altered miRNA expression.

Results: Twenty-three patients participated, with 13 (56.5%) undergoing flow diversion and 10 (43.5%) coil embolization. The median follow-up sample collection time was 10.70 months (SEM ± 1.32). No significant differences in angiographic occlusion were noted between intervention groups. Differentially expressed miRNAs were not identified between groups at baseline. However, at follow-up, 39 miRNAs were upregulated and 41 were downregulated, independent of intervention. Notably, three miRNAs (miR-4746-5p, miR-4685-3p, and miR-490-3p) were downregulated in the flow diversion group compared to the coil embolization group. Bioinformatics analysis revealed associations with upregulated fluid shear stress, p53, adherens junction pathways, along with downregulated apoptosis pathways.

Conclusions: This study suggests that fluid shear stress and apoptosis may influence aneurysm healing or thromboembolic events in flow diverter-treated patients. Further research is warranted to elucidate the functional significance of these findings in treatment outcomes, providing valuable insights for improved patient care in intracranial aneurysm management.

循环 miRNA 图谱作为血管内治疗后动脉瘤愈合的预测性生物标志物:一项前瞻性研究。
背景:动脉瘤治疗对于最大限度地降低破裂风险至关重要。人们对血管内治疗后介导细胞重塑、内皮化和动脉瘤愈合的潜在分子过程知之甚少。本研究旨在探索循环 miRNA 作为接受血管内治疗患者的治疗和结果相关生物标志物的作用:方法:研究人员招募了接受血管内介入治疗的未破裂颅内动脉瘤患者,这些患者接受了血流分流器置入术或线圈栓塞术。在介入治疗前和 6 至 18 个月的随访期间采集血液样本。从血浆中分离出总 mRNA/miRNA,然后进行 RNA-seq 分析。基因本体分析用于确定与 miRNA 表达改变相关的通路:23名患者参与了研究,其中13人(56.5%)接受了血流分流术,10人(43.5%)接受了线圈栓塞术。中位随访样本采集时间为 10.70 个月(SEM ± 1.32)。干预组之间的血管造影闭塞情况无明显差异。基线时未发现不同组间有差异表达的 miRNA。但在随访中,39 个 miRNA 上调,41 个下调,与干预无关。值得注意的是,与线圈栓塞组相比,血流改道组有三个 miRNA(miR-4746-5p、miR-4685-3p 和 miR-490-3p)下调。生物信息学分析显示,流体剪切应力、p53、粘连接头通路上调,凋亡通路下调:这项研究表明,流体剪切应力和细胞凋亡可能会影响经血流分流器治疗的患者的动脉瘤愈合或血栓栓塞事件。有必要进一步研究阐明这些发现在治疗结果中的功能意义,为改善颅内动脉瘤治疗中的患者护理提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信