Regions of interest in opportunistic computed tomography-based screening for osteoporosis: impact on short-term in vivo precision.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Jina Park, Youngjune Kim, Sehyun Hong, Choong Guen Chee, Eugene Lee, Joon Woo Lee
{"title":"Regions of interest in opportunistic computed tomography-based screening for osteoporosis: impact on short-term in vivo precision.","authors":"Jina Park, Youngjune Kim, Sehyun Hong, Choong Guen Chee, Eugene Lee, Joon Woo Lee","doi":"10.1007/s00256-024-04818-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine an optimal region of interest (ROI) for opportunistic screening of osteoporosis in terms of short-term in vivo diagnostic precision.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included patients who underwent two CT scans and one dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan within a month in 2022. Deep-learning software automatically measured the attenuation in L1 using 54 ROIs (three slice thicknesses × six shapes × three intravertebral levels). To identify factors associated with a lower attenuation difference between the two CT scans, mixed-effect model analysis was performed with ROI-level (slice thickness, shape, intravertebral levels) and patient-level (age, sex, patient diameter, change in CT machine) factors. The root-mean-square standard deviation (RMSSD) and area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 73 consecutive patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 69 ± 9 years, 38 women) were included. A lower attenuation difference was observed in ROIs in images with slice thicknesses of 1 and 3 mm than that in images with a slice thickness of 5 mm (p < .001), in large elliptical ROIs (p = .007 or < .001, respectively), and in mid- or cranial-level ROIs than that in caudal-level ROIs (p < .001). No patient-level factors were significantly associated with the attenuation difference. Large, elliptical ROIs placed at the mid-level of L1 on images with 1- or 3-mm slice thicknesses yielded RMSSDs of 12.4-12.5 HU and AUROCs of 0.90.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The largest possible regions of interest drawn in the mid-level trabecular portion of the L1 vertebra on thin-slice images may yield improvements in the precision of opportunistic screening for osteoporosis via CT.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skeletal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-024-04818-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine an optimal region of interest (ROI) for opportunistic screening of osteoporosis in terms of short-term in vivo diagnostic precision.

Materials and methods: We included patients who underwent two CT scans and one dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan within a month in 2022. Deep-learning software automatically measured the attenuation in L1 using 54 ROIs (three slice thicknesses × six shapes × three intravertebral levels). To identify factors associated with a lower attenuation difference between the two CT scans, mixed-effect model analysis was performed with ROI-level (slice thickness, shape, intravertebral levels) and patient-level (age, sex, patient diameter, change in CT machine) factors. The root-mean-square standard deviation (RMSSD) and area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated.

Results: In total, 73 consecutive patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 69 ± 9 years, 38 women) were included. A lower attenuation difference was observed in ROIs in images with slice thicknesses of 1 and 3 mm than that in images with a slice thickness of 5 mm (p < .001), in large elliptical ROIs (p = .007 or < .001, respectively), and in mid- or cranial-level ROIs than that in caudal-level ROIs (p < .001). No patient-level factors were significantly associated with the attenuation difference. Large, elliptical ROIs placed at the mid-level of L1 on images with 1- or 3-mm slice thicknesses yielded RMSSDs of 12.4-12.5 HU and AUROCs of 0.90.

Conclusion: The largest possible regions of interest drawn in the mid-level trabecular portion of the L1 vertebra on thin-slice images may yield improvements in the precision of opportunistic screening for osteoporosis via CT.

基于计算机断层扫描的骨质疏松症机会性筛查中的感兴趣区:对短期体内精确度的影响。
目的从短期活体诊断精度的角度确定骨质疏松症机会性筛查的最佳感兴趣区(ROI):我们纳入了 2022 年一个月内接受过两次 CT 扫描和一次双能 X 光吸收扫描的患者。深度学习软件使用 54 个 ROI(三个切片厚度 × 六种形状 × 三个椎体内水平)自动测量 L1 的衰减。为了确定与两次CT扫描之间较低衰减差异相关的因素,使用ROI级别(切片厚度、形状、椎管内水平)和患者级别(年龄、性别、患者直径、CT机变化)因素进行了混合效应模型分析。计算了均方根标准差(RMSSD)和接收者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC):共纳入 73 名连续患者(平均年龄为 69 ± 9 岁,38 名女性)。与切片厚度为 5 毫米的图像相比,切片厚度为 1 毫米和 3 毫米的图像中 ROI 的衰减差异较小(p 结论:与切片厚度为 5 毫米的图像相比,切片厚度为 1 毫米和 3 毫米的图像中 ROI 的衰减差异较小(p 结论):在薄片图像上的 L1 椎骨中层小梁部分绘制最大的感兴趣区,可提高通过 CT 进行骨质疏松症机会性筛查的精确度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Skeletal Radiology
Skeletal Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
253
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Skeletal Radiology provides a forum for the dissemination of current knowledge and information dealing with disorders of the musculoskeletal system including the spine. While emphasizing the radiological aspects of the many varied skeletal abnormalities, the journal also adopts an interdisciplinary approach, reflecting the membership of the International Skeletal Society. Thus, the anatomical, pathological, physiological, clinical, metabolic and epidemiological aspects of the many entities affecting the skeleton receive appropriate consideration. This is the Journal of the International Skeletal Society and the Official Journal of the Society of Skeletal Radiology and the Australasian Musculoskelelal Imaging Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信