Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Nonoperative Treatment and Arthroscopically Assisted Stabilization in Patients With Acute Rockwood Type 5 Acromioclavicular Dislocation.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-14 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241289117
Doruk Akgün, Henry Gebauer, Alp Paksoy, Larissa Eckl, Agahan Hayta, Ata Ücertas, Nicolas Barthod-Tonnot, Rony-Orijit Dey Hazra, Lucca Lacheta, Philipp Moroder, Jonas Pawelke
{"title":"Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Nonoperative Treatment and Arthroscopically Assisted Stabilization in Patients With Acute Rockwood Type 5 Acromioclavicular Dislocation.","authors":"Doruk Akgün, Henry Gebauer, Alp Paksoy, Larissa Eckl, Agahan Hayta, Ata Ücertas, Nicolas Barthod-Tonnot, Rony-Orijit Dey Hazra, Lucca Lacheta, Philipp Moroder, Jonas Pawelke","doi":"10.1177/23259671241289117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, Rockwood type 3 acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are initially treated nonoperatively, whereas surgery is recommended for Rockwood type 5 dislocations. However, multiple studies have been published favoring nonoperative approaches in patients with high-grade Rockwood injuries.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with acute Rockwood type 5 AC joint dislocations treated nonoperatively versus with arthroscopically assisted stabilization.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Included were 48 patients with acute Rockwood type 5 dislocation who were initially treated nonoperatively between June 2010 and June 2022 and 48 patients matched according to age, sex, affected side, and follow-up interval who underwent arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular (CC) stabilization using a suture-button technique, with additional percutaneous AC tape cerclage. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on the Subjective Shoulder Value, Nottingham Clavicle Score, Constant score, and visual analog scale for pain. The radiographic assessment included the CC distance, CC difference ratio, and degree of horizontal instability at final follow-up (62 ± 43 months).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the final follow-up, the Constant score was significantly higher in the nonoperative group (<i>P</i> = .02). The operative group had significantly higher pain levels on palpation of the AC joint (1.2 ± 2.2 vs 0.19 ± 0.5 for the nonoperative group; <i>P</i> = .003). In the operative group, the mean CC difference ratio was significantly higher at the latest follow-up compared with postoperatively (1.3 ± 0.3 vs 0.67 ± 0.3, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001), whereas the CC difference ratio of the nonoperative group was significantly reduced at the latest follow-up compared with postinjury (2.0 ± 0.5 vs 2.6 ± 0.8, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001). The operative group had a significantly lower CC difference ratio compared with the nonoperative group at final follow-up (<i>P</i> < .001). More than half of the patients (56%) who were treated operatively had a loss of reduction resulting in a Rockwood type 3 state at the latest follow-up, whereas 54% of patients treated nonoperatively had spontaneous reduction of injury severity from Rockwood type 5 to Rockwood type 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although 15% of the nonoperatively treated patients eventually required surgery, successful nonoperative treatment showed similar outcomes to initial operative treatment in patients with acute Rockwood type 5 dislocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"12 11","pages":"23259671241289117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241289117","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently, Rockwood type 3 acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are initially treated nonoperatively, whereas surgery is recommended for Rockwood type 5 dislocations. However, multiple studies have been published favoring nonoperative approaches in patients with high-grade Rockwood injuries.

Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with acute Rockwood type 5 AC joint dislocations treated nonoperatively versus with arthroscopically assisted stabilization.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Included were 48 patients with acute Rockwood type 5 dislocation who were initially treated nonoperatively between June 2010 and June 2022 and 48 patients matched according to age, sex, affected side, and follow-up interval who underwent arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular (CC) stabilization using a suture-button technique, with additional percutaneous AC tape cerclage. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on the Subjective Shoulder Value, Nottingham Clavicle Score, Constant score, and visual analog scale for pain. The radiographic assessment included the CC distance, CC difference ratio, and degree of horizontal instability at final follow-up (62 ± 43 months).

Results: At the final follow-up, the Constant score was significantly higher in the nonoperative group (P = .02). The operative group had significantly higher pain levels on palpation of the AC joint (1.2 ± 2.2 vs 0.19 ± 0.5 for the nonoperative group; P = .003). In the operative group, the mean CC difference ratio was significantly higher at the latest follow-up compared with postoperatively (1.3 ± 0.3 vs 0.67 ± 0.3, respectively; P < .001), whereas the CC difference ratio of the nonoperative group was significantly reduced at the latest follow-up compared with postinjury (2.0 ± 0.5 vs 2.6 ± 0.8, respectively; P < .001). The operative group had a significantly lower CC difference ratio compared with the nonoperative group at final follow-up (P < .001). More than half of the patients (56%) who were treated operatively had a loss of reduction resulting in a Rockwood type 3 state at the latest follow-up, whereas 54% of patients treated nonoperatively had spontaneous reduction of injury severity from Rockwood type 5 to Rockwood type 3.

Conclusion: Although 15% of the nonoperatively treated patients eventually required surgery, successful nonoperative treatment showed similar outcomes to initial operative treatment in patients with acute Rockwood type 5 dislocation.

急性 Rockwood 5 型肩锁关节脱位患者非手术治疗与关节镜辅助稳定治疗的临床疗效比较。
背景:目前,Rockwood 3 型肩锁关节(AC)脱位最初采用非手术治疗,而 Rockwood 5 型脱位则建议采用手术治疗。目的:比较非手术治疗与关节镜辅助稳定治疗急性Rockwood 5型交流关节脱位患者的临床和放射学结果:研究设计:队列研究;证据级别:3:纳入2010年6月至2022年6月期间接受非手术治疗的48例急性Rockwood 5型脱位患者,以及根据年龄、性别、患侧和随访间隔进行匹配的48例患者,这些患者接受了关节镜辅助下的冠状锁关节(CC)稳定术,采用缝合-扣锁技术,并附加经皮AC带环扎术。临床结果根据主观肩部价值、诺丁汉锁骨评分、常量评分和疼痛视觉模拟量表进行评估。影像学评估包括CC距离、CC差异比和最终随访(62 ± 43个月)时的水平不稳定程度:最后随访时,非手术组的 Constant 评分明显更高(P = .02)。手术组在触诊交流关节时的疼痛程度明显更高(1.2 ± 2.2 vs 0.19 ± 0.5;P = .003)。在手术组中,最近一次随访时的平均 CC 差异比明显高于术后(分别为 1.3 ± 0.3 vs 0.67 ± 0.3;P < .001),而非手术组最近一次随访时的 CC 差异比明显低于伤后(分别为 2.0 ± 0.5 vs 2.6 ± 0.8;P < .001)。最后随访时,手术组的 CC 差异比明显低于非手术组(P < .001)。在接受手术治疗的患者中,有一半以上(56%)的患者在最近一次随访时出现了缩减损失,导致Rockwood 3型状态,而在接受非手术治疗的患者中,有54%的患者自发将损伤严重程度从Rockwood 5型降至Rockwood 3型:尽管15%的非手术治疗患者最终需要进行手术治疗,但对于急性洛克伍德5型脱位患者来说,成功的非手术治疗与最初的手术治疗效果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信