Biomechanical and histological analyses of a multilayer stent in a swine model of suprarenal aortic aneurysm.

IF 2.5 4区 生物学 Q3 CELL BIOLOGY
Allana Maryel Tobita, Anna Paula Weinhardt Baptista Strazzi, Maria Fernanda Cassino Portugal, Nelson Wolosker, Ricardo Aun, Frederico de Lima Jacy Monteiro, Erasmo Simão da Silva, Igor Rafael Sincos
{"title":"Biomechanical and histological analyses of a multilayer stent in a swine model of suprarenal aortic aneurysm.","authors":"Allana Maryel Tobita, Anna Paula Weinhardt Baptista Strazzi, Maria Fernanda Cassino Portugal, Nelson Wolosker, Ricardo Aun, Frederico de Lima Jacy Monteiro, Erasmo Simão da Silva, Igor Rafael Sincos","doi":"10.14670/HH-18-842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze and compare, in an animal model, the treatment of thoracoabdominal aneurysms with multilayer stents and its hemodynamic effects through the biomechanical and histological analysis of the aortic wall in contact with the stent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Large White pigs were randomized into two groups: Stent (n=6) and Control (n=5, non-stent). All animals were subjected to the creation of a suprarenal aneurysm with a bovine pericardial patch. In the Stent group, a multilayer stent was implanted immediately after aneurysm formation. After four weeks, all animals were subjected to angiographic assessment and intravascular ultrasound, and the stent was explanted before euthanasia for histological and biomechanical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At histological analysis, the groups did not differ significantly in maximum thickness of the intima (<i>p</i>=0.526), media (<i>p</i>=0.129), or adventitia (<i>p</i>=0.662). Thrombus formation was observed in 100% of the animals on the intima and media layers of the stented aorta vs. none in the Control group (<i>p</i>=0.048). At biomechanical analysis, no statistical differences were observed in aortic wall elasticity (<i>p</i>=0.158), strength (<i>p</i>=0.360), or thickness (<i>p</i>=0.323).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified thrombosis of the aneurysmal sac through the presence of thrombi on the intima of the aorta in 100% of the animals in the Stent group; as for the biomechanical analysis, this study showed no statistical differences in vessel wall thickness, strength, and elasticity between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":13164,"journal":{"name":"Histology and histopathology","volume":" ","pages":"18842"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Histology and histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-18-842","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze and compare, in an animal model, the treatment of thoracoabdominal aneurysms with multilayer stents and its hemodynamic effects through the biomechanical and histological analysis of the aortic wall in contact with the stent.

Methods: Large White pigs were randomized into two groups: Stent (n=6) and Control (n=5, non-stent). All animals were subjected to the creation of a suprarenal aneurysm with a bovine pericardial patch. In the Stent group, a multilayer stent was implanted immediately after aneurysm formation. After four weeks, all animals were subjected to angiographic assessment and intravascular ultrasound, and the stent was explanted before euthanasia for histological and biomechanical analyses.

Results: At histological analysis, the groups did not differ significantly in maximum thickness of the intima (p=0.526), media (p=0.129), or adventitia (p=0.662). Thrombus formation was observed in 100% of the animals on the intima and media layers of the stented aorta vs. none in the Control group (p=0.048). At biomechanical analysis, no statistical differences were observed in aortic wall elasticity (p=0.158), strength (p=0.360), or thickness (p=0.323).

Conclusion: We identified thrombosis of the aneurysmal sac through the presence of thrombi on the intima of the aorta in 100% of the animals in the Stent group; as for the biomechanical analysis, this study showed no statistical differences in vessel wall thickness, strength, and elasticity between groups.

肾上主动脉瘤猪模型中多层支架的生物力学和组织学分析。
目的通过对与支架接触的主动脉壁进行生物力学和组织学分析,在动物模型中分析和比较用多层支架治疗胸腹动脉瘤及其对血流动力学的影响:方法:将大白猪随机分为两组:方法:将大白猪随机分为两组:支架组(n=6)和对照组(n=5,非支架组)。所有动物都要接受用牛心包补片制造肾上动脉瘤的手术。在支架组,动脉瘤形成后立即植入多层支架。四周后,对所有动物进行血管造影评估和血管内超声检查,并在安乐死前取出支架进行组织学和生物力学分析:在组织学分析中,各组在内膜最大厚度(P=0.526)、介质(P=0.129)或血管前膜(P=0.662)方面没有显著差异。支架主动脉内膜和介质层 100%观察到血栓形成,而对照组无血栓形成(p=0.048)。生物力学分析显示,主动脉壁弹性(p=0.158)、强度(p=0.360)或厚度(p=0.323)均无统计学差异:结论:通过支架组动物主动脉内膜上血栓的存在,我们确定了动脉瘤囊的血栓形成;至于生物力学分析,本研究显示各组之间在血管壁厚度、强度和弹性方面没有统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Histology and histopathology
Histology and histopathology 生物-病理学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
232
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: HISTOLOGY AND HISTOPATHOLOGY is a peer-reviewed international journal, the purpose of which is to publish original and review articles in all fields of the microscopical morphology, cell biology and tissue engineering; high quality is the overall consideration. Its format is the standard international size of 21 x 27.7 cm. One volume is published every year (more than 1,300 pages, approximately 90 original works and 40 reviews). Each volume consists of 12 numbers published monthly online. The printed version of the journal includes 4 books every year; each of them compiles 3 numbers previously published online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信