The impact of MAFLD on coronary plaque characteristics and physiologic status: a coronary CT angiography study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Qian Liu, Xin-De Zheng, Yu-Yao Xiao, Zhi-Han Xu, Meng-Meng Yu, Meng-Su Zeng
{"title":"The impact of MAFLD on coronary plaque characteristics and physiologic status: a coronary CT angiography study.","authors":"Qian Liu, Xin-De Zheng, Yu-Yao Xiao, Zhi-Han Xu, Meng-Meng Yu, Meng-Su Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Our study sought to determine the impact of MAFLD on both the anatomy and function of coronary plaques.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 203 participants (including 728 plaques) with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and abdominal ultrasound were prospectively enrolled. Participants were divided into MAFLD and non-MAFLD groups. For each plaque, necrotic core plaque volume and fractional flow reserve derived from CT (FFR<sub>CT</sub>) were measured. Obstructive CAD, segment involvement score (SIS) >4, high-risk plaque (HRP) and FFR<sub>CT</sub> ≤ 0.8 were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to non-MAFLD, necrotic core plaque volume was higher in MAFLD at both participant level (p < 0.001) and plaque level (p = 0.001). MAFLD had a higher prevalence of obstructive CAD, SIS >4, HRP and FFR<sub>CT</sub> ≤ 0.8 at participant level (obstructive CAD: 35.9% vs 21.6%, p = 0.026; SIS >4: 39.7% vs 17.6%, p < 0.001; HRP: 55.1% vs 29.6%, p < 0.001; FFR<sub>CT</sub> ≤0.8: 33.3% vs 15.2%, p = 0.002). In addition, MAFLD predicted the presence of obstructive CAD (adjusted OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.22-4.87; p = 0.011), SIS >4 (adjusted OR: 3.64; 95% CI: 1.78-7.46; p < 0.001), HRP (adjusted OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.37-4.63; p = 0.003) and FFR<sub>CT</sub> ≤ 0.8 (adjusted OR: 3.53; 95% CI: 1.65-7.57; p = 0.001) independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MAFLD is associated with CCTA derived plaque characteristics, including the severity and extent of CAD, HRP, as well as physiologic status, independent of traditional risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Our study sought to determine the impact of MAFLD on both the anatomy and function of coronary plaques.

Materials and methods: A total of 203 participants (including 728 plaques) with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and abdominal ultrasound were prospectively enrolled. Participants were divided into MAFLD and non-MAFLD groups. For each plaque, necrotic core plaque volume and fractional flow reserve derived from CT (FFRCT) were measured. Obstructive CAD, segment involvement score (SIS) >4, high-risk plaque (HRP) and FFRCT ≤ 0.8 were assessed.

Results: Compared to non-MAFLD, necrotic core plaque volume was higher in MAFLD at both participant level (p < 0.001) and plaque level (p = 0.001). MAFLD had a higher prevalence of obstructive CAD, SIS >4, HRP and FFRCT ≤ 0.8 at participant level (obstructive CAD: 35.9% vs 21.6%, p = 0.026; SIS >4: 39.7% vs 17.6%, p < 0.001; HRP: 55.1% vs 29.6%, p < 0.001; FFRCT ≤0.8: 33.3% vs 15.2%, p = 0.002). In addition, MAFLD predicted the presence of obstructive CAD (adjusted OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.22-4.87; p = 0.011), SIS >4 (adjusted OR: 3.64; 95% CI: 1.78-7.46; p < 0.001), HRP (adjusted OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.37-4.63; p = 0.003) and FFRCT ≤ 0.8 (adjusted OR: 3.53; 95% CI: 1.65-7.57; p = 0.001) independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors.

Conclusion: MAFLD is associated with CCTA derived plaque characteristics, including the severity and extent of CAD, HRP, as well as physiologic status, independent of traditional risk factors.

MAFLD 对冠状动脉斑块特征和生理状态的影响:冠状动脉 CT 血管造影研究。
理由和目标:代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪肝(MAFLD)与心血管事件风险增加有关。我们的研究旨在确定 MAFLD 对冠状动脉斑块的解剖和功能的影响:我们对 203 名疑似冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者(包括 728 个斑块)进行了前瞻性登记,这些患者接受了冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术(CCTA)和腹部超声检查。参与者分为MAFLD组和非MAFLD组。测量每个斑块的坏死核心斑块体积和 CT 导出的分数血流储备(FFRCT)。对阻塞性CAD、节段受累评分(SIS)>4、高危斑块(HRP)和FFRCT≤0.8进行了评估:与非 MAFLD 患者相比,MAFLD 患者的坏死核心斑块体积在参与者水平(p 4、HRP 和 FFRCT ≤ 0.8)上都更高(阻塞性 CAD:35.9% vs 21.6%,p = 0.026;SIS >4:39.7% vs 17.6%,p CT ≤0.8:33.3% vs 15.2%,p = 0.002)。此外,MAFLD 可预测是否存在阻塞性 CAD(调整后 OR:2.44;95% CI:1.22-4.87;p = 0.011)、SIS >4(调整后 OR:3.64;95% CI:1.22-4.87;p = 0.011):3.64; 95% CI: 1.78-7.46; p CT ≤ 0.8 (adjusted OR: 3.53; 95% CI: 1.65-7.57; p = 0.001),不受传统心血管风险因素的影响:结论:MAFLD与CCTA得出的斑块特征相关,包括CAD的严重程度和范围、HRP以及生理状态,不受传统风险因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信