Utilization Fraction of Ambulatory Hand Procedures: Cost-Reduction Through Surgical Instrument Tray Optimization.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
HAND Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1177/15589447241288255
Ogechukwu C Onuh, Michael F Cassidy, David L Tran, Hilliard T Brydges, Miguel I Dorante, Matteo Laspro, John Muller, Lifei Guo, Nikhil A Agrawal, Ernest S Chiu
{"title":"Utilization Fraction of Ambulatory Hand Procedures: Cost-Reduction Through Surgical Instrument Tray Optimization.","authors":"Ogechukwu C Onuh, Michael F Cassidy, David L Tran, Hilliard T Brydges, Miguel I Dorante, Matteo Laspro, John Muller, Lifei Guo, Nikhil A Agrawal, Ernest S Chiu","doi":"10.1177/15589447241288255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our objective is to evaluate the utilization fraction (UF) of surgical instruments during a commonly performed ambulatory hand surgery case as an avenue for cost reduction, increased operating room efficiency, and systems quality improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The total number of instruments opened at the start of the case was recorded followed by instruments being divided into those used and not used during the procedure. Total sterile processing costs were estimated at $1.56 per instrument according to data from our institution's central sterilization processing (CSP) department.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen hand procedures performed by 2 surgeons were included in this study. An average of 120.1 ± 10.9 instruments were opened at the start of each case, while an average of 12.6 ± 5.4 instruments were used per case (Figure 1). This yielded an UF of 10.7% ± 4.8%. Using our internal CSP estimate, we calculated an annual cost of $16 863 to reprocess the current hand tray (Figure 2). Using literature data, this cost ranged from $5 513 to $34 484 annually. The same cost calculations were performed for the theoretical optimized tray (incorporating instruments used at least 20% of the time when opened) containing 23.2 instruments. The annual reprocessing cost of this new tray according to CSP data was $3 260, demonstrating a cost-reduction of $13 603 or 80.7% (Figure 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluation of pre- and peri-operative processes is a valuable technique to mitigate increasing healthcare costs and reduce unnecessary healthcare spending, with broad applicability to multiple surgical subspecialties and procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"15589447241288255"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447241288255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Our objective is to evaluate the utilization fraction (UF) of surgical instruments during a commonly performed ambulatory hand surgery case as an avenue for cost reduction, increased operating room efficiency, and systems quality improvement.

Methods: The total number of instruments opened at the start of the case was recorded followed by instruments being divided into those used and not used during the procedure. Total sterile processing costs were estimated at $1.56 per instrument according to data from our institution's central sterilization processing (CSP) department.

Results: Nineteen hand procedures performed by 2 surgeons were included in this study. An average of 120.1 ± 10.9 instruments were opened at the start of each case, while an average of 12.6 ± 5.4 instruments were used per case (Figure 1). This yielded an UF of 10.7% ± 4.8%. Using our internal CSP estimate, we calculated an annual cost of $16 863 to reprocess the current hand tray (Figure 2). Using literature data, this cost ranged from $5 513 to $34 484 annually. The same cost calculations were performed for the theoretical optimized tray (incorporating instruments used at least 20% of the time when opened) containing 23.2 instruments. The annual reprocessing cost of this new tray according to CSP data was $3 260, demonstrating a cost-reduction of $13 603 or 80.7% (Figure 2).

Conclusions: Evaluation of pre- and peri-operative processes is a valuable technique to mitigate increasing healthcare costs and reduce unnecessary healthcare spending, with broad applicability to multiple surgical subspecialties and procedures.

门诊手部手术的利用率:通过优化手术器械托盘降低成本。
背景:我们的目的是评估门诊手外科常用手术器械的使用率(UF),以此降低成本,提高手术室效率,改善系统质量:我们的目的是评估在通常情况下进行的门诊手外科手术中手术器械的使用率(UF),以此作为降低成本、提高手术室效率和改善系统质量的途径:方法:记录病例开始时打开的器械总数,然后将器械分为手术过程中使用和未使用的器械。根据本机构中央消毒处理(CSP)部门提供的数据,估计每件器械的消毒处理总成本为 1.56 美元:本研究共纳入 2 名外科医生实施的 19 例手部手术。每例手术开始时平均打开 120.1 ± 10.9 个器械,每例手术平均使用 12.6 ± 5.4 个器械(图 1)。由此得出的 UF 为 10.7% ± 4.8%。根据内部 CSP 估算,我们计算出每年重新处理现有手托的成本为 16 863 美元(图 2)。根据文献数据,每年的成本从 5 513 美元到 34 484 美元不等。我们对理论上优化后的手托(包含打开时至少 20% 使用时间的器械)进行了相同的成本计算,该手托包含 23.2 种器械。根据 CSP 数据,这种新托盘每年的再处理成本为 3 260 美元,成本降低了 13 603 美元或 80.7%(图 2):对术前和围手术期流程进行评估是一项宝贵的技术,可减轻日益增长的医疗成本并减少不必要的医疗支出,广泛适用于多个外科亚专科和手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信