Factors associated with breast cancer detection method in California women: an analysis of California Health Interview Survey data.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Alice W Lee, Claudia Solis, Steph Tubman, Nicole Wells
{"title":"Factors associated with breast cancer detection method in California women: an analysis of California Health Interview Survey data.","authors":"Alice W Lee, Claudia Solis, Steph Tubman, Nicole Wells","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07534-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast cancer mortality has significantly declined in the U.S. due in part to effective clinical screening methods. However, previous studies have found many women first detect their breast cancers through means other than their providers. Given that detection method has been shown to be an important prognostic factor, we examined the association between breast cancer detection method and various demographic and health-related factors in a representative sample of female breast cancer patients aged 40 + in California.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the 2009 and 2011-2012 California Health Interview Survey. Weighted percentages of breast cancer patients by detection method were calculated. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to quantify each factor's association with the likelihood of having a patient-detected versus clinically detected breast cancer using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>36% of female breast cancer patients first detected their cancer themselves. Compared to U.S.-born women, those who had spent 40% or less of their lifetime in the U.S. were more than twice as likely to report their breast cancer being patient-detected versus clinically detected (OR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.06-4.86, p = 0.035). Rural women were also more likely to report a patient-detected breast cancer than urban women (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.01-2.11, p = 0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recent immigrants and those residing in rural areas were more likely to report self-detecting their breast cancer. Given the persistent disparities with regard to breast cancer mortality, particularly among underserved communities, strategies addressing barriers to screening uptake in these populations may be warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07534-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer mortality has significantly declined in the U.S. due in part to effective clinical screening methods. However, previous studies have found many women first detect their breast cancers through means other than their providers. Given that detection method has been shown to be an important prognostic factor, we examined the association between breast cancer detection method and various demographic and health-related factors in a representative sample of female breast cancer patients aged 40 + in California.

Methods: We analyzed data from the 2009 and 2011-2012 California Health Interview Survey. Weighted percentages of breast cancer patients by detection method were calculated. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to quantify each factor's association with the likelihood of having a patient-detected versus clinically detected breast cancer using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: 36% of female breast cancer patients first detected their cancer themselves. Compared to U.S.-born women, those who had spent 40% or less of their lifetime in the U.S. were more than twice as likely to report their breast cancer being patient-detected versus clinically detected (OR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.06-4.86, p = 0.035). Rural women were also more likely to report a patient-detected breast cancer than urban women (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.01-2.11, p = 0.044).

Conclusions: Recent immigrants and those residing in rural areas were more likely to report self-detecting their breast cancer. Given the persistent disparities with regard to breast cancer mortality, particularly among underserved communities, strategies addressing barriers to screening uptake in these populations may be warranted.

与加州妇女乳腺癌检测方法相关的因素:加州健康访谈调查数据分析。
目的:在美国,乳腺癌死亡率已显著下降,这部分归功于有效的临床筛查方法。然而,以往的研究发现,许多妇女最初发现乳腺癌的途径并不是她们的医疗服务提供者。鉴于检测方法已被证明是一个重要的预后因素,我们以加利福尼亚州 40 岁以上女性乳腺癌患者为代表性样本,研究了乳腺癌检测方法与各种人口统计学和健康相关因素之间的关联:我们分析了 2009 年和 2011-2012 年加州健康访谈调查的数据。按检测方法计算了乳腺癌患者的加权百分比。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型,用几率比(OR)和 95% 置信区间(CI)来量化每个因素与患者检测出乳腺癌和临床检测出乳腺癌的可能性之间的关系:36%的女性乳腺癌患者是自己首次发现癌症的。与在美国出生的女性相比,那些一生中有 40% 或更少的时间在美国度过的女性报告其乳腺癌是由患者发现的可能性是临床发现的两倍多(OR = 2.27,95% CI 1.06-4.86,p = 0.035)。农村妇女也比城市妇女更有可能报告其乳腺癌是由患者检测出来的(OR = 1.51,95% CI 1.01-2.11,p = 0.044):结论:新移民和居住在农村地区的妇女更有可能报告自己检测出乳腺癌。鉴于乳腺癌死亡率持续存在差异,特别是在服务不足的社区中,可能需要采取策略解决这些人群接受筛查的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信