Effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss values of single-shade resin composites.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hanife Altınışık, Esra Özyurt
{"title":"Effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss values of single-shade resin composites.","authors":"Hanife Altınışık, Esra Özyurt","doi":"10.1186/s12903-024-05163-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate variations in the surface roughness and gloss of different single-shade resin composites after polishing with a range of systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 120 specimens were prepared from three different types of single-shade resin composites (supra-nanospherical-Omnichroma, nanohybrid-Charisma Diamond One, and microhybrid- Essentia Universal). The specimens were placed in distilled water and stored at 37 °C for 24 h. Each resin composite (n = 40) was divided into four groups (n = 10) according to the finishing/polishing (F/P) system: Mylar strip (control), Sof-Lex (multi-step), Twist Dia (two-step), and OneGloss (one-step). Surface roughness and gloss were measured. Surface characteristics were evaluated by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's honestly significant difference test were used for statistical analysis (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all the composites, both the highest surface roughness and lowest gloss values were obtained in the groups treated with the OneGloss polishing system (p < 0.05). Compared with all the composites, Omnichroma had the lowest surface roughness and highest gloss values (except Twist Dia) both unpolished and after polishing with all the F/P systems (p < 0.05). All composites treated with the Twist Dia F/P system had similar gloss values. The results of the AFM and SEM analyses were consistent with the surface roughness measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The gloss values of both the microhybrid and nanohybrid composites after F/P using the two-step system was superior to that of the traditional multistep system. The surface of the supra-nanofilled resin-based composite was smoother than that of both the microhybrid and nanohybrid composites.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"1391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05163-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate variations in the surface roughness and gloss of different single-shade resin composites after polishing with a range of systems.

Methods: In total, 120 specimens were prepared from three different types of single-shade resin composites (supra-nanospherical-Omnichroma, nanohybrid-Charisma Diamond One, and microhybrid- Essentia Universal). The specimens were placed in distilled water and stored at 37 °C for 24 h. Each resin composite (n = 40) was divided into four groups (n = 10) according to the finishing/polishing (F/P) system: Mylar strip (control), Sof-Lex (multi-step), Twist Dia (two-step), and OneGloss (one-step). Surface roughness and gloss were measured. Surface characteristics were evaluated by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's honestly significant difference test were used for statistical analysis (p < 0.05).

Results: Among all the composites, both the highest surface roughness and lowest gloss values were obtained in the groups treated with the OneGloss polishing system (p < 0.05). Compared with all the composites, Omnichroma had the lowest surface roughness and highest gloss values (except Twist Dia) both unpolished and after polishing with all the F/P systems (p < 0.05). All composites treated with the Twist Dia F/P system had similar gloss values. The results of the AFM and SEM analyses were consistent with the surface roughness measurements.

Conclusions: The gloss values of both the microhybrid and nanohybrid composites after F/P using the two-step system was superior to that of the traditional multistep system. The surface of the supra-nanofilled resin-based composite was smoother than that of both the microhybrid and nanohybrid composites.

不同抛光系统对单色树脂复合材料表面粗糙度和光泽度的影响
背景:本研究旨在评估不同单一色调树脂复合材料在使用一系列系统抛光后表面粗糙度和光泽度的变化:从三种不同类型的单一色调树脂复合材料(超纳米球形-Omnichroma、纳米混合-Charisma Diamond One 和微混合-Essentia Universal)中制备了 120 个试样。每种树脂复合材料(n = 40)按表面处理/抛光(F/P)系统分为四组(n = 10):Mylar 带(对照组)、Sof-Lex(多步骤)、Twist Dia(两步骤)和 OneGloss(单步骤)。对表面粗糙度和光泽度进行了测量。原子力显微镜(AFM)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对表面特性进行了评估。统计分析采用了双向方差分析(ANOVA)和 Tukey 诚实显著性差异检验(P 结果:在所有复合材料中,使用 OneGloss 抛光系统处理的复合材料表面粗糙度最高,光泽度最低(p 结论:OneGloss 抛光系统处理的复合材料表面粗糙度最高,光泽度最低:使用两步法进行 F/P 处理后,微杂化物和纳米杂化物复合材料的光泽值均优于传统的多步法。超纳米填充树脂基复合材料的表面比微杂化和纳米杂化复合材料的表面更光滑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信