Nitrogen form differently modulates nitrogen uptake and utilization and related gene expression between two tea cultivars

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 HORTICULTURE
Dandan Tang, Zhen Jin, Lu Long, Zhongyue Zhang, Yanjuan Yang, Xiaoqin Tan, Chunjing Yang, Wei Chen, Liqiang Tan, Qian Tang
{"title":"Nitrogen form differently modulates nitrogen uptake and utilization and related gene expression between two tea cultivars","authors":"Dandan Tang, Zhen Jin, Lu Long, Zhongyue Zhang, Yanjuan Yang, Xiaoqin Tan, Chunjing Yang, Wei Chen, Liqiang Tan, Qian Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nitrogen (N) is essential for the growth and development of tea plants, and ammonium (NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup>) and nitrate (NO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">3</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-</ce:sup>) are crucial N sources for tea yield and amino acid contents. However, the uptake and utilization of different N forms in tea plants are different. Reasonable N form is an important means to enhance the growth and development of tea plants. Therefore, supplying suitable N forms may be effective way to optimize N use efficiency. A hydroponic trial was conducted with 'Chuancha No.2′ (CC) and 'Emeiwenchun' (EW) tea cultivars with N form treatments: NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup> and NO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">3</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-</ce:sup>. The results showed that there were significant difference in the NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup>/NO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">3</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-</ce:sup> uptake kinetics, dynamic changes in <ce:sup loc=\"post\">15</ce:sup>N abundance, enzyme activities, and related gene expression in N metabolism between CC and EW after NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup>/NO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">3</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-</ce:sup> treatment. In CC and EW, NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup> and NO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">3</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-</ce:sup> uptake followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics at low N concentrations (&lt; 1 mmol <ce:small-caps>l</ce:small-caps><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-1</ce:sup>), but CC exhibited a slightly higher uptake rate than EW when supplied with 2 mmol <ce:small-caps>l</ce:small-caps><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-1</ce:sup> NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup>. In a 0–24 h <ce:sup loc=\"post\">15</ce:sup>N tracing experiment, CC roots accumulated <ce:sup loc=\"post\">15</ce:sup>N faster than EW under NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup>. NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup>-fed CC exhibited higher GS activities and higher expression levels of <ce:italic>CsAMTs</ce:italic> and genes involved in N utilization, such as <ce:italic>CsNR, CsGS2, CsGDH1</ce:italic>, and <ce:italic>CsTS1</ce:italic>, compared to EW. When NO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">3</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-</ce:sup> was provided, EW roots accumulated more <ce:sup loc=\"post\">15</ce:sup>N than CC roots from 8 to 24 h, which could be attributed to the higher NR activities and higher expression levels of <ce:italic>CsNRT1.5, CsNR, CsGS1.1</ce:italic> and <ce:italic>CsGS1.2</ce:italic> than those in CC. In summary, the two tea varieties exhibited distinct characteristics of N uptake and utilization, as well as gene expression patterns under NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup>/NO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">3</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-</ce:sup> treatments. CC demonstrated an advantage in NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup> uptake and assimilation, while EW exhibited an advantage in NO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">3</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-</ce:sup>.","PeriodicalId":21679,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Horticulturae","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Horticulturae","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113804","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HORTICULTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) is essential for the growth and development of tea plants, and ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3-) are crucial N sources for tea yield and amino acid contents. However, the uptake and utilization of different N forms in tea plants are different. Reasonable N form is an important means to enhance the growth and development of tea plants. Therefore, supplying suitable N forms may be effective way to optimize N use efficiency. A hydroponic trial was conducted with 'Chuancha No.2′ (CC) and 'Emeiwenchun' (EW) tea cultivars with N form treatments: NH4+ and NO3-. The results showed that there were significant difference in the NH4+/NO3- uptake kinetics, dynamic changes in 15N abundance, enzyme activities, and related gene expression in N metabolism between CC and EW after NH4+/NO3- treatment. In CC and EW, NH4+ and NO3- uptake followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics at low N concentrations (< 1 mmol l-1), but CC exhibited a slightly higher uptake rate than EW when supplied with 2 mmol l-1 NH4+. In a 0–24 h 15N tracing experiment, CC roots accumulated 15N faster than EW under NH4+. NH4+-fed CC exhibited higher GS activities and higher expression levels of CsAMTs and genes involved in N utilization, such as CsNR, CsGS2, CsGDH1, and CsTS1, compared to EW. When NO3- was provided, EW roots accumulated more 15N than CC roots from 8 to 24 h, which could be attributed to the higher NR activities and higher expression levels of CsNRT1.5, CsNR, CsGS1.1 and CsGS1.2 than those in CC. In summary, the two tea varieties exhibited distinct characteristics of N uptake and utilization, as well as gene expression patterns under NH4+/NO3- treatments. CC demonstrated an advantage in NH4+ uptake and assimilation, while EW exhibited an advantage in NO3-.
两种茶叶栽培品种的氮形态对氮吸收和利用及相关基因表达的不同调节作用
氮(N)对茶树的生长发育至关重要,而铵(NH4+)和硝酸盐(NO3-)是茶叶产量和氨基酸含量的关键氮源。然而,茶树对不同形态氮的吸收和利用是不同的。合理的氮形态是促进茶树生长发育的重要手段。因此,提供合适的氮形态可能是优化氮利用效率的有效方法。本研究以 "川茶 2 号"(CC)和 "峨眉文春"(EW)为茶树品种,进行了氮形态处理的水培试验:NH4+ 和 NO3-。结果表明,NH4+/NO3-处理后,CC和EW对NH4+/NO3-的吸收动力学、15N丰度的动态变化、酶活性以及氮代谢相关基因的表达均存在显著差异。在低氮浓度(< 1 mmol l-1)下,CC和EW对NH4+和NO3-的吸收遵循Michaelis-Menten动力学,但在提供2 mmol l-1 NH4+时,CC的吸收率略高于EW。在 0-24 h 15N 追踪实验中,在 NH4+ 条件下,CC 根系积累 15N 的速度比 EW 快。与 EW 相比,NH4+喂养的 CC 表现出更高的 GS 活性和更高的 CsAMTs 以及参与氮利用的基因(如 CsNR、CsGS2、CsGDH1 和 CsTS1)表达水平。当提供NO3-时,EW根系在8-24 h内比CC根系积累了更多的15N,这可能是由于EW根系比CC根系具有更高的NR活性和更高的CsNRT1.5、CsNR、CsGS1.1和CsGS1.2的表达水平。总之,在 NH4+/NO3- 处理下,两个茶树品种表现出不同的氮吸收和利用特征以及基因表达模式。CC在NH4+吸收和同化方面表现出优势,而EW则在NO3-方面表现出优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientia Horticulturae
Scientia Horticulturae 农林科学-园艺
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.70%
发文量
796
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Scientia Horticulturae is an international journal publishing research related to horticultural crops. Articles in the journal deal with open or protected production of vegetables, fruits, edible fungi and ornamentals under temperate, subtropical and tropical conditions. Papers in related areas (biochemistry, micropropagation, soil science, plant breeding, plant physiology, phytopathology, etc.) are considered, if they contain information of direct significance to horticulture. Papers on the technical aspects of horticulture (engineering, crop processing, storage, transport etc.) are accepted for publication only if they relate directly to the living product. In the case of plantation crops, those yielding a product that may be used fresh (e.g. tropical vegetables, citrus, bananas, and other fruits) will be considered, while those papers describing the processing of the product (e.g. rubber, tobacco, and quinine) will not. The scope of the journal includes all horticultural crops but does not include speciality crops such as, medicinal crops or forestry crops, such as bamboo. Basic molecular studies without any direct application in horticulture will not be considered for this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信