The role of healthcare professionals' attitudes in treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: A scoping review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
India Pinker, Lisa Wetzlmair-Kephart, Allini Mafra da Costa, Sophie Pilleron
{"title":"The role of healthcare professionals' attitudes in treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: A scoping review.","authors":"India Pinker, Lisa Wetzlmair-Kephart, Allini Mafra da Costa, Sophie Pilleron","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2024.102151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The global population of older adults with cancer is increasing, presenting care challenges caused by comorbidity, polypharmacy, and frailty. In response to these complexities, healthcare professionals (HCPs) rely on their own attitudes to a larger extent due to limitations in the treatment evidence for this population. This scoping review aims to explore and describe the attitudes of HCPs in the context of treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review on HCP attitudes or subjective inclinations in the treatment decision-making process for older adults with cancer. PubMed, Embase, Medline, and EBSCO CINAHL Complete were searched using predefined inclusion criteria. A two-step screening process was implemented, conducted by two-reviewer teams.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 5161 de-duplicated references, 21 studies were retained for analysis (nine qualitative, six quantitative, five mixed methods). Five patterns were observed, highlighting how HCP attitudes can shape consultation dynamics, influence the interpretation of patient factors such as age and comorbidities, and impact communication with older patients. Additionally, HCP background profession and practice environment emerged as influential in shaping both attitudes and decision-making processes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This scoping review describes the role of HCP attitudes in communicating treatment options with older adults with cancer. It suggests the importance of considering the role of attitudes in decision-making when developing educational resources for geriatric-centred communication skills to support shared decision-making practices in the cancer treatment of older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":" ","pages":"102151"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2024.102151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The global population of older adults with cancer is increasing, presenting care challenges caused by comorbidity, polypharmacy, and frailty. In response to these complexities, healthcare professionals (HCPs) rely on their own attitudes to a larger extent due to limitations in the treatment evidence for this population. This scoping review aims to explore and describe the attitudes of HCPs in the context of treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer.

Materials and methods: We conducted a scoping review on HCP attitudes or subjective inclinations in the treatment decision-making process for older adults with cancer. PubMed, Embase, Medline, and EBSCO CINAHL Complete were searched using predefined inclusion criteria. A two-step screening process was implemented, conducted by two-reviewer teams.

Results: From 5161 de-duplicated references, 21 studies were retained for analysis (nine qualitative, six quantitative, five mixed methods). Five patterns were observed, highlighting how HCP attitudes can shape consultation dynamics, influence the interpretation of patient factors such as age and comorbidities, and impact communication with older patients. Additionally, HCP background profession and practice environment emerged as influential in shaping both attitudes and decision-making processes.

Discussion: This scoping review describes the role of HCP attitudes in communicating treatment options with older adults with cancer. It suggests the importance of considering the role of attitudes in decision-making when developing educational resources for geriatric-centred communication skills to support shared decision-making practices in the cancer treatment of older adults.

医护人员的态度在老年癌症患者治疗决策中的作用:范围综述。
简介全球患有癌症的老年人口正在不断增加,这给护理工作带来了因合并症、多重药物治疗和体弱而造成的挑战。为了应对这些复杂问题,医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)在更大程度上依赖于自己的态度,因为针对这一人群的治疗证据存在局限性。本范围界定综述旨在探讨和描述医护人员在为老年癌症患者做出治疗决策时的态度:我们对高级保健人员在癌症老年人治疗决策过程中的态度或主观倾向进行了范围界定综述。我们使用预定义的纳入标准对 PubMed、Embase、Medline 和 EBSCO CINAHL Complete 进行了检索。筛选过程分为两步,由两名审稿人共同完成:从 5161 篇重复的参考文献中,保留了 21 篇研究进行分析(9 篇定性研究,6 篇定量研究,5 篇混合方法研究)。研究发现了五种模式,突出了保健医生的态度如何影响会诊动态,影响对年龄和合并症等患者因素的解释,以及影响与老年患者的沟通。此外,高级保健医生的背景专业和执业环境对态度和决策过程的形成也有影响:本范围界定综述描述了保健医生的态度在与老年癌症患者沟通治疗方案时的作用。它表明,在开发以老年病为中心的沟通技巧教育资源以支持老年人癌症治疗中的共同决策实践时,考虑态度在决策中的作用非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of geriatric oncology
Journal of geriatric oncology ONCOLOGY-GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
379
审稿时长
80 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geriatric Oncology is an international, multidisciplinary journal which is focused on advancing research in the treatment and survivorship issues of older adults with cancer, as well as literature relevant to education and policy development in geriatric oncology. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts in the following categories: • Original research articles • Review articles • Clinical trials • Education and training articles • Short communications • Perspectives • Meeting reports • Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信