Fractal dimension, lacunarity, and bone area fraction analysis of peri-implant trabecular bone after prosthodontic loading.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Nesrin Dundar, Elif Aslan, Onur Mutlu
{"title":"Fractal dimension, lacunarity, and bone area fraction analysis of peri-implant trabecular bone after prosthodontic loading.","authors":"Nesrin Dundar, Elif Aslan, Onur Mutlu","doi":"10.1007/s11282-024-00784-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the structural alterations in peri-implant bone occurring 5 years after prosthodontic loading in panoramic radiography (PR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PR images of 44 mandibular and 33 maxillary implants along with 42 healthy control teeth taken before and 5 years after prosthodontic loading were included. Two regions-of-interest (ROI) were selected from mesial and distal surrounding bone of each implant and tooth. Then, the selected ROIs were divided to obtain three sub-ROIs (coronal, middle, and apical) on each side. A total of eight ROIs and sub-ROIs from each implant and control tooth were used for the calculations of fractal dimension (FD), lacunarity, and bone area fraction (BA/TA). The paired-sample t test was used to compare measurements before and 5 years after loading (p = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall evaluation of 77 implants showed that FD decreased at the middle and apical peri-implant bone levels 5 years after loading (p < 0.05). In mandibular implants, BA/TA decreased after loading (p < 0.05). While FD decreased at the coronal level (p = 0.022), lacunarity increased at the middle level of mandibular implants (p < 0.05). In maxillary implants, FD decreased at the middle and BA/TA decreased at the coronal level (p < 0.05). On the other hand, BA/TA increased at the apical level of maxillary implants (p = 0.016) after loading. None of the parameters revealed any difference in the control group (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FD and BA/TA can be used to analyze structural changes in peri-implant bone after prosthodontic loading. Additionally, FD, lacunarity and BA/TA may provide useful information about changes occurring at different levels of peri-implant bone.</p>","PeriodicalId":56103,"journal":{"name":"Oral Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-024-00784-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the structural alterations in peri-implant bone occurring 5 years after prosthodontic loading in panoramic radiography (PR).

Methods: PR images of 44 mandibular and 33 maxillary implants along with 42 healthy control teeth taken before and 5 years after prosthodontic loading were included. Two regions-of-interest (ROI) were selected from mesial and distal surrounding bone of each implant and tooth. Then, the selected ROIs were divided to obtain three sub-ROIs (coronal, middle, and apical) on each side. A total of eight ROIs and sub-ROIs from each implant and control tooth were used for the calculations of fractal dimension (FD), lacunarity, and bone area fraction (BA/TA). The paired-sample t test was used to compare measurements before and 5 years after loading (p = 0.05).

Results: Overall evaluation of 77 implants showed that FD decreased at the middle and apical peri-implant bone levels 5 years after loading (p < 0.05). In mandibular implants, BA/TA decreased after loading (p < 0.05). While FD decreased at the coronal level (p = 0.022), lacunarity increased at the middle level of mandibular implants (p < 0.05). In maxillary implants, FD decreased at the middle and BA/TA decreased at the coronal level (p < 0.05). On the other hand, BA/TA increased at the apical level of maxillary implants (p = 0.016) after loading. None of the parameters revealed any difference in the control group (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: FD and BA/TA can be used to analyze structural changes in peri-implant bone after prosthodontic loading. Additionally, FD, lacunarity and BA/TA may provide useful information about changes occurring at different levels of peri-implant bone.

修复加载后种植体周围骨小梁的分形维度、裂隙度和骨面积分数分析。
目的通过全景放射摄影(PR)评估义齿加载 5 年后种植体周围骨的结构变化:方法:纳入 44 颗下颌种植体和 33 颗上颌种植体以及 42 颗健康对照牙的全景放射影像,分别拍摄于义齿加载前和义齿加载 5 年后。从每个种植体和牙齿的中轴和远轴周围骨质中选取两个感兴趣区(ROI)。然后,将选定的 ROI 划分,在每侧获得三个子 ROI(冠状、中间和根尖)。每个种植体和对照牙共有八个 ROI 和子 ROI 用于计算分形维度(FD)、裂隙度和骨面积分数(BA/TA)。使用配对样本 t 检验比较加载前和加载后 5 年的测量结果(p = 0.05):结果:对 77 个种植体的总体评估显示,加载 5 年后,种植体中部和根尖周骨水平的 FD 有所下降(P 0.05):结论:FD和BA/TA可用于分析义齿加载后种植体周围骨的结构变化。此外,FD、裂隙度和 BA/TA 可以提供有关种植体周围不同水平骨质变化的有用信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral Radiology
Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
87
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official English-language journal of the Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and the Asian Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Oral Radiology is intended to be a forum for international collaboration in head and neck diagnostic imaging and all related fields. Oral Radiology features cutting-edge research papers, review articles, case reports, and technical notes from both the clinical and experimental fields. As membership in the Society is not a prerequisite, contributions are welcome from researchers and clinicians worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信