Diagnostic Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Distinguishing Common Pediatric Posterior Fossa Tumors: A Single Center Retrospective Study.

IF 1.3 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Umur Anil Pehlivan, Elif Habibe Aktekin, Cigdem Yalcin, Bermal Hasbay, Aylin Gunesli, Ozlem Alkan
{"title":"Diagnostic Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Distinguishing Common Pediatric Posterior Fossa Tumors: A Single Center Retrospective Study.","authors":"Umur Anil Pehlivan, Elif Habibe Aktekin, Cigdem Yalcin, Bermal Hasbay, Aylin Gunesli, Ozlem Alkan","doi":"10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.24154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pediatric posterior fossa tumors pose diagnostic challenges due to their diverse histopathological features and variable clinical presentations. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as the initial diagnostic tool; however, additional modalities, such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), are essential for refining tumor classification. This retrospective single-center study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameters in distinguishing between the most common pediatric posterior fossa tumors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-nine patients under the age of 18 (27 females and 32 males) with histopathologically diagnosed primary posterior fossa tumors underwent pre-treatment conventional and diffusion MRI. Apparent diffusion coefficient values were measured from solid tumor regions and normal cerebellar parenchyma, with subsequent calculation of tumor/normal cerebellar ADC ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median ADC values for pilocytic astrocytomas (PAs) were 1786.2 × 10-6 mm2 /s, ependymomas 1144.9 × 10-6 mm2 /s, and for medulloblastomas 666.1 × 10-6 mm2 /s were significantly different (P < .001 for all three). Similarly, the median ADC ratios demonstrated discriminatory potential, with PAs showing the highest ratio (2.46), followed by ependymomas (1.55) and medulloblastomas (0.89) (P < .001 for all three). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed distinct ADC cutoffs and ratios for differentiating all tumor types from each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite limitations, such as a small cohort size and different MRI protocols, our results show that ADC metrics are especially useful for distinguishing between the most common pediatric posterior fossa tumors. We recommend that future studies integrate advanced imaging techniques and larger cohorts to improve diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":75267,"journal":{"name":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","volume":"59 6","pages":"560-566"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.24154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pediatric posterior fossa tumors pose diagnostic challenges due to their diverse histopathological features and variable clinical presentations. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as the initial diagnostic tool; however, additional modalities, such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), are essential for refining tumor classification. This retrospective single-center study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameters in distinguishing between the most common pediatric posterior fossa tumors.

Materials and methods: Fifty-nine patients under the age of 18 (27 females and 32 males) with histopathologically diagnosed primary posterior fossa tumors underwent pre-treatment conventional and diffusion MRI. Apparent diffusion coefficient values were measured from solid tumor regions and normal cerebellar parenchyma, with subsequent calculation of tumor/normal cerebellar ADC ratios.

Results: The median ADC values for pilocytic astrocytomas (PAs) were 1786.2 × 10-6 mm2 /s, ependymomas 1144.9 × 10-6 mm2 /s, and for medulloblastomas 666.1 × 10-6 mm2 /s were significantly different (P < .001 for all three). Similarly, the median ADC ratios demonstrated discriminatory potential, with PAs showing the highest ratio (2.46), followed by ependymomas (1.55) and medulloblastomas (0.89) (P < .001 for all three). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed distinct ADC cutoffs and ratios for differentiating all tumor types from each other.

Conclusion: Despite limitations, such as a small cohort size and different MRI protocols, our results show that ADC metrics are especially useful for distinguishing between the most common pediatric posterior fossa tumors. We recommend that future studies integrate advanced imaging techniques and larger cohorts to improve diagnostic accuracy.

弥散加权成像在区分常见小儿后窝肿瘤中的诊断效用:单中心回顾性研究
目的:小儿后窝肿瘤具有多种组织病理学特征和多变的临床表现,给诊断带来了挑战。传统的磁共振成像(MRI)可作为初步诊断工具;然而,弥散加权成像(DWI)等其他模式对于完善肿瘤分类至关重要。这项回顾性单中心研究旨在评估表观弥散系数(ADC)参数在区分最常见的儿科后窝肿瘤方面的诊断效用:59名18岁以下、经组织病理学诊断为原发性后窝肿瘤的患者(27名女性和32名男性)接受了治疗前常规和弥散磁共振成像检查。测量实体瘤区和正常小脑实质的表观扩散系数值,然后计算肿瘤/正常小脑的ADC比值:结果表明:髓细胞星形细胞瘤(PAs)的中位 ADC 值为 1786.2 × 10-6 mm2 /s,外胚叶瘤为 1144.9 × 10-6 mm2 /s,髓母细胞瘤为 666.1 × 10-6 mm2 /s,三者有显著差异(P < .001)。同样,中位 ADC 比值也显示出鉴别潜力,其中 PA 的比值最高(2.46),其次是外胚叶瘤(1.55)和髓母细胞瘤(0.89)(三者的 P 均<0.001)。接收者操作特征分析表明,ADC临界值和比率在区分所有肿瘤类型方面都有不同:尽管存在队列规模小和磁共振成像方案不同等局限性,但我们的研究结果表明,ADC指标对区分最常见的儿科后窝肿瘤特别有用。我们建议未来的研究结合先进的成像技术和更大规模的队列,以提高诊断的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信