Clinical Remission in Patients With Biologic-Naïve Asthma: A Multicenter Study in Japan.

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Keiji Oishi, Kazuki Hamada, Ayumi Fukatsu-Chikumoto, Yoriyuki Murata, Maki Asami-Noyama, Nobutaka Edakuni, Tsunahiko Hirano, Kazuto Matsunaga
{"title":"Clinical Remission in Patients With Biologic-Naïve Asthma: A Multicenter Study in Japan.","authors":"Keiji Oishi, Kazuki Hamada, Ayumi Fukatsu-Chikumoto, Yoriyuki Murata, Maki Asami-Noyama, Nobutaka Edakuni, Tsunahiko Hirano, Kazuto Matsunaga","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2024.10.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical remission (CR) is a new realistic management goal for patients with asthma, regardless of the disease severity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the rate of achievement of CR in patients treated with inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-agonist (ICS/LABA) and nonbiologics and the characteristics of patients who achieved CR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a post hoc analysis from a multicenter, cross-sectional survey in Japan. 3-way CR was defined as the absence of exacerbation, no use of maintenance oral corticosteroids, and the absence of significant asthma symptoms (5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire < 1.5). We defined 4-way CR as 3-way CR plus having normalized lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [%FEV<sub>1</sub>] ≥ 80%). Deep remission was defined as 4-way CR plus suppressed type 2 airway inflammation (fraction of exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO] < 35 ppb).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The criteria for 3-way CR, 4-way CR, and deep remission were met by 56.9%, 35.0%, and 24.7% of patients, respectively. Compared with patients who achieved the 3-way CR, unachieved patients have lower %FEV<sub>1</sub> (77.6% vs 85.4%; P < .0001) and higher FeNO levels (42 ppb vs 34 ppb; P = .0182), and there were more discordances in asthma control perception between patient and physicians (38.5% vs 9.3%; P < .0001). Physician-patient discordance was an independent factor that prevented the achievement of the 3-way CR in the logistic regression analysis, even when adjusted for %FEV<sub>1</sub> and FeNO (odds ratio 0.397; P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Achieving CR in patients treated with ICS/LABA without biologics is challenging. Discrepancies between patient and physician perceptions on asthma control are significant barriers to achieving CR.</p>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.10.037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical remission (CR) is a new realistic management goal for patients with asthma, regardless of the disease severity.

Objective: To investigate the rate of achievement of CR in patients treated with inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA) and nonbiologics and the characteristics of patients who achieved CR.

Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis from a multicenter, cross-sectional survey in Japan. 3-way CR was defined as the absence of exacerbation, no use of maintenance oral corticosteroids, and the absence of significant asthma symptoms (5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire < 1.5). We defined 4-way CR as 3-way CR plus having normalized lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [%FEV1] ≥ 80%). Deep remission was defined as 4-way CR plus suppressed type 2 airway inflammation (fraction of exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO] < 35 ppb).

Results: The criteria for 3-way CR, 4-way CR, and deep remission were met by 56.9%, 35.0%, and 24.7% of patients, respectively. Compared with patients who achieved the 3-way CR, unachieved patients have lower %FEV1 (77.6% vs 85.4%; P < .0001) and higher FeNO levels (42 ppb vs 34 ppb; P = .0182), and there were more discordances in asthma control perception between patient and physicians (38.5% vs 9.3%; P < .0001). Physician-patient discordance was an independent factor that prevented the achievement of the 3-way CR in the logistic regression analysis, even when adjusted for %FEV1 and FeNO (odds ratio 0.397; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Achieving CR in patients treated with ICS/LABA without biologics is challenging. Discrepancies between patient and physician perceptions on asthma control are significant barriers to achieving CR.

生物制剂无效哮喘患者的临床缓解:日本一项多中心研究。
背景:临床缓解(CR)是哮喘患者新的现实管理目标,无论疾病严重程度如何:调查接受吸入性皮质激素/长效β2-受体激动剂(ICS/LABA)和非生物制剂治疗的患者达到临床缓解的比率,以及达到临床缓解的患者的特征:我们对日本的一项多中心横断面调查进行了事后分析。3 向 CR 定义为无病情加重、未使用维持性口服皮质类固醇、无明显哮喘症状(5 项哮喘控制问卷 [ACQ] < 1.5)。我们将 4 向 CR 定义为 3 向 CR 加上肺功能正常化(用力呼气容积 [%FEV1] ≥ 80%)。深度缓解(DR)的定义是:4向CR加上2型气道炎症得到抑制(部分呼出一氧化氮[FeNO] < 35 ppb):分别有 56.9%、35.0% 和 24.7% 的患者达到了 3 向 CR、4 向 CR 和 DR 的标准。与达到 3 向 CR 的患者相比,未达到 CR 的患者的肺活量百分比较低(77.6% 对 85.4%,p):使用 ICS/LABA 而不使用生物制剂的患者达到 CR 具有挑战性。患者和医生对哮喘控制的看法不一致是实现 CR 的重大障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
9.60%
发文量
683
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases. This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders. The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信