Lifestyle Medicine Implementation in Family Medicine Clinic.

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kiren Bashir, Courtney B Johnson-Gonzalez, Akshima Dhiman, Timothy N Crawford, Jennifer S Lee
{"title":"Lifestyle Medicine Implementation in Family Medicine Clinic.","authors":"Kiren Bashir, Courtney B Johnson-Gonzalez, Akshima Dhiman, Timothy N Crawford, Jennifer S Lee","doi":"10.1177/15598276241289316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Lifestyle medicine, a patient-centered approach promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors, is an evidence-based tool for preventing and treating chronic diseases. It has been shown to reduce the burden of physical and psychological diseases. Despite this, clinical implementation is lagging, with physicians facing barriers effectively encouraging lifestyle change. <b>Objective:</b> This project studies the Lifestyle Medicine Assessment (LMA) tool regarding ease of implementation and influence on patient motivation, perception of lifestyle changes, and satisfaction. <b>Methods:</b> A two-pronged approach was conducted. First, the implementation time was recorded for multiple encounters (N = 42). Next, a different subset of patients (N = 22) receiving the LMA completed a pre- and post-encounter survey about their motivation to change, perception of lifestyle changes on well-being, and visit satisfaction. A control group (N = 21) also received these surveys. <b>Results:</b> The average time of application was 7.12 min. Intragroup scores for motivation to change were significantly higher in the LMA group post-intervention (<i>p</i> <sub><i>LMA</i></sub> <i>=</i> .001), but not in the control group. <b>Conclusion:</b> These results show the potential benefits of the LMA tool in a clinical setting, demonstrating realistically achievable implementation times and increased patient motivation regarding better lifestyle choices. Providers should consider using the LMA tool to promote lifestyle change within their practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47480,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"15598276241289316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276241289316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lifestyle medicine, a patient-centered approach promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors, is an evidence-based tool for preventing and treating chronic diseases. It has been shown to reduce the burden of physical and psychological diseases. Despite this, clinical implementation is lagging, with physicians facing barriers effectively encouraging lifestyle change. Objective: This project studies the Lifestyle Medicine Assessment (LMA) tool regarding ease of implementation and influence on patient motivation, perception of lifestyle changes, and satisfaction. Methods: A two-pronged approach was conducted. First, the implementation time was recorded for multiple encounters (N = 42). Next, a different subset of patients (N = 22) receiving the LMA completed a pre- and post-encounter survey about their motivation to change, perception of lifestyle changes on well-being, and visit satisfaction. A control group (N = 21) also received these surveys. Results: The average time of application was 7.12 min. Intragroup scores for motivation to change were significantly higher in the LMA group post-intervention (p LMA = .001), but not in the control group. Conclusion: These results show the potential benefits of the LMA tool in a clinical setting, demonstrating realistically achievable implementation times and increased patient motivation regarding better lifestyle choices. Providers should consider using the LMA tool to promote lifestyle change within their practice.

在全科诊所实施生活方式医学。
背景:生活方式医学是一种以病人为中心的方法,提倡健康的生活方式行为,是预防和治疗慢性疾病的循证工具。事实证明,它可以减轻生理和心理疾病的负担。尽管如此,临床实施仍然滞后,医生在有效鼓励改变生活方式方面面临障碍。目标:本项目研究生活方式医学评估(LMA)工具的实施难易程度以及对患者动机、生活方式改变的感知和满意度的影响。方法: 采用双管齐下的方法:采用双管齐下的方法。首先,记录了多次就诊的实施时间(N = 42)。其次,接受 LMA 的不同患者子集(22 人)在就诊前和就诊后完成了一项调查,内容涉及他们的改变动机、对生活方式改变对健康的影响以及就诊满意度。对照组(21 人)也接受了这些调查。结果:平均使用时间为 7.12 分钟。干预后,LMA 组的组内改变动机得分明显高于对照组(p LMA = .001)。结论:这些结果表明了 LMA 工具在临床环境中的潜在益处,展示了切实可行的实施时间,并提高了患者选择更好生活方式的积极性。医疗服务提供者应考虑使用 LMA 工具来促进生活方式的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
119
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信