Letting Go of the Status Quo: One Program's Experience Discontinuing Ethics Committees and Creating Alternative Structures for Engagement.

Q3 Medicine
Hilary Mabel, Kate M Gordon, Jessica Ginsberg, Jason Lesandrini, Bryan Kibbe, Lexi C White, David Reis, Barquiesha Madison, Jamila Young, Steven Shields, Jameisha Brown, Jordan Potter
{"title":"Letting Go of the Status Quo: One Program's Experience Discontinuing Ethics Committees and Creating Alternative Structures for Engagement.","authors":"Hilary Mabel, Kate M Gordon, Jessica Ginsberg, Jason Lesandrini, Bryan Kibbe, Lexi C White, David Reis, Barquiesha Madison, Jamila Young, Steven Shields, Jameisha Brown, Jordan Potter","doi":"10.1086/732207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractThe authors describe their Ethics Program's transition from utilizing ethics committees to instead implementing a three-initiative structure consisting of Ethics Grand Rounds, an Ethics Liaison Network, and an Ethics Advisory Group. They first outline the history of ethics committees. Then, they discuss the history of their Ethics Program and the challenges that ethics committees posed. Next, they describe their approach to developing new initiatives for non-ethicist healthcare professionals to engage in ethics work and what these initiatives specifically entail. They then describe how they worked to secure buy-in for dissolving their ethics committees and, based on pre- and post-implementation surveys, how this transition has been received by former ethics committee members. Finally, the authors reflect on what has been gained and lost through these changes and offer insights and recommendations for other ethics programs thinking about discontinuing their own ethics committees in favor of more innovative models.</p>","PeriodicalId":39646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ethics","volume":"35 4","pages":"260-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/732207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThe authors describe their Ethics Program's transition from utilizing ethics committees to instead implementing a three-initiative structure consisting of Ethics Grand Rounds, an Ethics Liaison Network, and an Ethics Advisory Group. They first outline the history of ethics committees. Then, they discuss the history of their Ethics Program and the challenges that ethics committees posed. Next, they describe their approach to developing new initiatives for non-ethicist healthcare professionals to engage in ethics work and what these initiatives specifically entail. They then describe how they worked to secure buy-in for dissolving their ethics committees and, based on pre- and post-implementation surveys, how this transition has been received by former ethics committee members. Finally, the authors reflect on what has been gained and lost through these changes and offer insights and recommendations for other ethics programs thinking about discontinuing their own ethics committees in favor of more innovative models.

放弃现状:一个项目终止伦理委员会并创建其他参与结构的经验。
摘要 作者介绍了他们的伦理项目从利用伦理委员会到实施由伦理大查房、伦理联络网和伦理咨询小组组成的三倡议结构的转变过程。他们首先概述了伦理委员会的历史。然后,他们讨论了伦理项目的历史以及伦理委员会带来的挑战。接下来,他们介绍了为非伦理学家医护专业人员参与伦理工作制定新举措的方法,以及这些举措的具体内容。然后,他们介绍了如何努力争取解散伦理委员会的支持,以及根据实施前后的调查,前伦理委员会成员对这一转变的看法。最后,作者反思了这些变革的得失,并为其他考虑解散自己的伦理委员会、转而采用更具创新性的模式的伦理项目提供了见解和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Ethics
Journal of Clinical Ethics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ethics is written for and by physicians, nurses, attorneys, clergy, ethicists, and others whose decisions directly affect patients. More than 70 percent of the articles are authored or co-authored by physicians. JCE is a double-blinded, peer-reviewed journal indexed in PubMed, Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, the Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, and other indexes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信