Precision oncology implementation in a regional-based health care system: A professional consensus to define the pathway

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Maria Carla Barducci , Valeria Domenica Tozzi , Giacomo Pelizzari , Giuseppe Aprile , Francesco Grossi , Carmine Pinto , Gianpiero Fasola
{"title":"Precision oncology implementation in a regional-based health care system: A professional consensus to define the pathway","authors":"Maria Carla Barducci ,&nbsp;Valeria Domenica Tozzi ,&nbsp;Giacomo Pelizzari ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Aprile ,&nbsp;Francesco Grossi ,&nbsp;Carmine Pinto ,&nbsp;Gianpiero Fasola","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Precision Oncology requires deep changes in organizational settings but little evidence has been identified about the best strategy to guarantee the delivery of this innovation to patients. In the Italian health care system, high heterogeneity could jeopardize equal access opportunity for patients. Following a consensus method, we aim to define shared solutions to address these issues in clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A Delphi RAND method was chosen to record the consensus among involved health care professionals in the Italian region of Friuli Venezia Giulia. The item generation phase was conducted following a bottom-up approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten statements were defined on the main topics that emerged from the direct observation of the current practice, focusing on Molecular Tumor Board organization, massive parallel sequencing technology application, laboratory report content and informed consensus submission. All the statements reached a strong consensus and have been shared with the health care government authorities of our region.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The direct observation of the current practice in different health care authorities allowed to define ten statements as solution proposals to solve the identified complexities. This methodological approach could be applied in different organizational models but aiming to achieve a homogeneous clinical outcome for patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100515"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538324000493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Precision Oncology requires deep changes in organizational settings but little evidence has been identified about the best strategy to guarantee the delivery of this innovation to patients. In the Italian health care system, high heterogeneity could jeopardize equal access opportunity for patients. Following a consensus method, we aim to define shared solutions to address these issues in clinical practice.

Method

A Delphi RAND method was chosen to record the consensus among involved health care professionals in the Italian region of Friuli Venezia Giulia. The item generation phase was conducted following a bottom-up approach.

Results

Ten statements were defined on the main topics that emerged from the direct observation of the current practice, focusing on Molecular Tumor Board organization, massive parallel sequencing technology application, laboratory report content and informed consensus submission. All the statements reached a strong consensus and have been shared with the health care government authorities of our region.

Conclusions

The direct observation of the current practice in different health care authorities allowed to define ten statements as solution proposals to solve the identified complexities. This methodological approach could be applied in different organizational models but aiming to achieve a homogeneous clinical outcome for patients.
精准肿瘤学在地区医疗保健系统中的实施:界定路径的专业共识。
目的:精准肿瘤学需要对组织环境进行深刻变革,但目前几乎没有证据表明有什么最佳策略可确保向患者提供这一创新成果。在意大利的医疗保健系统中,高度的异质性可能会危及患者的平等就医机会。根据共识法,我们旨在确定共同的解决方案,以解决临床实践中的这些问题:方法:在意大利弗留利-威尼斯-朱利亚(Friuli Venezia Giulia)地区,我们选择了德尔菲-兰德(Delphi RAND)方法来记录相关医疗专业人员之间的共识。项目生成阶段采用自下而上的方法:结果:根据对当前实践的直接观察得出的主要议题,确定了十项声明,重点是分子肿瘤委员会的组织、大规模平行测序技术的应用、实验室报告的内容和知情共识的提交。所有声明都达成了强烈的共识,并已与本地区的医疗保健政府部门分享:通过对不同医疗机构当前做法的直接观察,确定了十项声明,作为解决所发现复杂问题的方案建议。这种方法可以应用于不同的组织模式,但其目的是为患者实现相同的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信