Portuguese version of the citizenship fatigue scale: adaptation and evidence of validity.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Paula C Neves, Cláudia Andrade, Lia Alves
{"title":"Portuguese version of the citizenship fatigue scale: adaptation and evidence of validity.","authors":"Paula C Neves, Cláudia Andrade, Lia Alves","doi":"10.1186/s40359-024-02150-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Citizenship fatigue has been identified as a negative consequence of performing organizational citizenship behaviors and has been studied due to its undesirable effects on employees and organizations. This article aims to present the results of adapting the citizenship fatigue scale to Portuguese language and to provide evidence of its validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research methodology involved multiple stages. Initially, the Citizenship Fatigue Scale was translated into Portuguese using a robust back-translation process involving three bilingual translators to ensure semantic accuracy. Subsequently, for psychometric testing, the Citizenship Fatigue Scale and Compulsory Citizenship Behavior Scale were administered to a sample of 406 employees from different economic sectors (103 male; 303 female), aged 18 to 70 years. Reliability and validity indicators were calculated from the CFA structure, employing the maximum likelihood estimation with bootstrapping. Gender invariance was examined at three different levels: [1] configural invariance [2], factor loading invariance and [3] factor loading and intercept invariance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The internal consistency, of the whole scale, measured by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.94. The composite reliability value was also very satisfactory (CF = 0.94). The variance extracted from mean (AVE) value of 0.79 was higher than the required limit of 0.50, indicating an adequate fit of the model. The confirmatory analysis supported a single-factor model and showed good to very good fit indexes (CFI = 1.00; GFI = 0.99; RMSEA ≤ 0.01). The model was successfully replicated with a male and female sample.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results confirm that the Portuguese version of the Citizenship Fatigue Scale is a reliable instrument for research with Portuguese speaking samples and international research.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"12 1","pages":"650"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558854/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02150-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Citizenship fatigue has been identified as a negative consequence of performing organizational citizenship behaviors and has been studied due to its undesirable effects on employees and organizations. This article aims to present the results of adapting the citizenship fatigue scale to Portuguese language and to provide evidence of its validity.

Methods: The research methodology involved multiple stages. Initially, the Citizenship Fatigue Scale was translated into Portuguese using a robust back-translation process involving three bilingual translators to ensure semantic accuracy. Subsequently, for psychometric testing, the Citizenship Fatigue Scale and Compulsory Citizenship Behavior Scale were administered to a sample of 406 employees from different economic sectors (103 male; 303 female), aged 18 to 70 years. Reliability and validity indicators were calculated from the CFA structure, employing the maximum likelihood estimation with bootstrapping. Gender invariance was examined at three different levels: [1] configural invariance [2], factor loading invariance and [3] factor loading and intercept invariance.

Results: The internal consistency, of the whole scale, measured by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.94. The composite reliability value was also very satisfactory (CF = 0.94). The variance extracted from mean (AVE) value of 0.79 was higher than the required limit of 0.50, indicating an adequate fit of the model. The confirmatory analysis supported a single-factor model and showed good to very good fit indexes (CFI = 1.00; GFI = 0.99; RMSEA ≤ 0.01). The model was successfully replicated with a male and female sample.

Discussion: The results confirm that the Portuguese version of the Citizenship Fatigue Scale is a reliable instrument for research with Portuguese speaking samples and international research.

葡萄牙语版公民疲劳量表:适应性和有效性证据。
背景:公民疲劳已被确定为实施组织公民行为的负面后果,由于其对员工和组织的不良影响,人们对其进行了研究。本文旨在介绍将公民疲劳量表改编为葡萄牙语的结果,并提供其有效性的证据:研究方法包括多个阶段。起初,为了确保语义的准确性,公民疲劳量表被翻译成了葡萄牙语,翻译过程中使用了强有力的回译程序,有三位双语翻译参与其中。随后,对来自不同经济部门的 406 名雇员(103 名男性;303 名女性)进行了公民疲劳量表和强制性公民行为量表的心理测试,这些雇员的年龄在 18 岁至 70 岁之间。信度和效度指标是根据 CFA 结构,采用最大似然估计和引导法计算得出的。性别不变性在三个不同层面上进行了检验:[1] 配置不变性[2]、因子载荷不变性以及[3] 因子载荷和截距不变性:结果:整个量表的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha)为 0.94。综合信度值也非常令人满意(CF = 0.94)。从平均值中提取的方差(AVE)值为 0.79,高于所要求的 0.50,表明模型的拟合度很高。确证分析支持单因素模型,并显示出良好至非常好的拟合指数(CFI = 1.00;GFI = 0.99;RMSEA ≤ 0.01)。该模型成功地在男性和女性样本中进行了复制:讨论:研究结果证实,葡萄牙语版公民疲劳量表是一种可靠的工具,适用于葡萄牙语样本研究和国际研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信