Interobserver variability in the histopathological classification and grading of dysplasia in elevated colon lesions in the city of Lima.

Q4 Medicine
Guido Gallegos-Serruto, Aldo Gutiérrez, Cesar Chian García, Isthvan Torres Perez
{"title":"Interobserver variability in the histopathological classification and grading of dysplasia in elevated colon lesions in the city of Lima.","authors":"Guido Gallegos-Serruto, Aldo Gutiérrez, Cesar Chian García, Isthvan Torres Perez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colonic polyp refers to lesions that exhibit a protrusion of the mucosa, regardless of histology. The most recent WHO classification is based on a better understanding of these lesions; however, its application in daily practice could be subject to interobserver variability biases that could have clinical implications.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the interobserver variability in the histopathological reporting and grading of dysplasia of samples obtained from elevated colon lesions in a private laboratory in the city of Lima.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Observational, descriptive, and prospective study: Case series type. All biopsies of elevated colon lesions received over a period of 3 months were evaluated by two observers without clinical information of the cases, to diagnose the lesions according to the WHO classification. In cases of diagnostic differences, the cases were evaluated together to reach a consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A Kappa coefficient value of 0.458 was obtained in the diagnostic classification of elevated colon lesions, while a Kappa value of 0.416 in the evaluation of dysplasia; indicating moderate agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite achieving moderate agreement between evaluators, this work demonstrates the importance of not only relying on morphological criteria for diagnostic classification, but also including criteria of location and size of these lesions to increase diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":35807,"journal":{"name":"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru","volume":"44 3","pages":"239-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colonic polyp refers to lesions that exhibit a protrusion of the mucosa, regardless of histology. The most recent WHO classification is based on a better understanding of these lesions; however, its application in daily practice could be subject to interobserver variability biases that could have clinical implications.

Objectives: To determine the interobserver variability in the histopathological reporting and grading of dysplasia of samples obtained from elevated colon lesions in a private laboratory in the city of Lima.

Materials and methods: Observational, descriptive, and prospective study: Case series type. All biopsies of elevated colon lesions received over a period of 3 months were evaluated by two observers without clinical information of the cases, to diagnose the lesions according to the WHO classification. In cases of diagnostic differences, the cases were evaluated together to reach a consensus.

Results: A Kappa coefficient value of 0.458 was obtained in the diagnostic classification of elevated colon lesions, while a Kappa value of 0.416 in the evaluation of dysplasia; indicating moderate agreement.

Conclusions: Despite achieving moderate agreement between evaluators, this work demonstrates the importance of not only relying on morphological criteria for diagnostic classification, but also including criteria of location and size of these lesions to increase diagnostic accuracy.

利马市结肠隆起病变组织病理学分类和发育不良分级的观察者间差异。
结肠息肉是指粘膜突起的病变,与组织学无关。最新的世卫组织分类法是基于对这些病变的更好理解而制定的;然而,在日常实践中应用该分类法可能会受到观察者间变异性偏差的影响,从而对临床产生影响:目的:确定利马市一家私人实验室对结肠隆起病变样本进行组织病理学报告和发育不良分级时观察者之间的差异性:观察性、描述性和前瞻性研究:病例系列类型。由两名没有病例临床信息的观察员对 3 个月内收到的所有结肠隆起病变活检样本进行评估,并根据世界卫生组织的分类对病变进行诊断。如果诊断结果存在差异,则共同对病例进行评估,以达成共识:结肠隆起病变诊断分类的 Kappa 系数值为 0.458,而发育不良评估的 Kappa 系数值为 0.416;这表明两者之间存在中等程度的一致性:结论:尽管评估者之间达成了中等程度的一致,但这项工作表明,不仅要依靠形态学标准进行诊断分类,还要包括这些病变的位置和大小标准,以提高诊断的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: La REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGíA DEL PERÚ, es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú que publica artículos originales, artículos de revisión, reporte de casos, cartas e información general de la especialidad; dirigido a los profesionales de la salud con especial interés en la gastroenterología. La Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú es una publicación de periodicidad trimestral y tiene como objetivo la publicación de artículos científicos inéditos en el campo de la gastroenterología, proporcionando información actualizada y relevante de la especialidad y áreas afines. La Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú publica artículos en dos idiomas, español e inglés, a texto completo en la versión impresa yelectrónica. Los artículos científicos son sometidos a revisores o árbitros nacionales e internacionales, especialistas que opinan bajo la modalidad de doble ciego y de manera anónima sobre la calidad y validez de los mismos. El número de revisores depende del tipo de artículo, dos revisores como mínimo para artículos originales y uno como mínimo para otros tipos de artículos.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信