{"title":"The Acoustic Emission Testing in the Evaluation of Fracture Toughness of Brittle Materials.","authors":"Camille Haddad, Jean Gebran Eng, Amine El Zoghbi","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Evaluating the fracture resistance of dental ceramics is essential for assessing their behavior. This study aimed to validate a custom load-to-fracture test for assessing fracture strength compared to a conventional method.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Acoustic emission testing, a non-destructive (ND) lab test, was employed to evaluate the fracture toughness (FT) of brittle materials by capturing sound waves generated by crack formation in failing samples. A total of 130 samples, divided into three types (glass sheets, zirconia sheets, and monolithic zirconia crowns), were tested. The fracture loads were measured using both custom and conventional methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean fracture loads for glass sheets were 650.46 N ± 110.38 (custom) compared to 691.41 N ± 155.92 (conventional). For zirconia sheets, the values were 95.25 N ± 7.78 (custom) vs 112.75 N ± 31.26 (conventional). Monolithic zirconia crowns showed mean fracture loads of 1108.99 N ± 327.89 (custom) compared to 1292.52 N ± 271.42 (conventional). Statistically significant differences were evident in all three types, indicating lower values with custom testing for all samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The custom testing demonstrated an advantage in identifying cracks at lower loads, thereby enhancing the accuracy of fracture load values. Despite its limitations, the study suggests that the custom setup could be a viable alternative to conventional fracture load testing of brittle materials. However, further testing with more materials is recommended to enhance the results' accuracy and generalizability.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The findings indicate that the custom load-to-fracture test can provide more accurate measurements of FT in dental ceramics, which is crucial for predicting their clinical performance and longevity. How to cite this article: Haddad C, Eng JG, Zoghbi AE. The Acoustic Emission Testing in the Evaluation of Fracture Toughness of Brittle Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(7):617-623.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"25 7","pages":"617-623"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Evaluating the fracture resistance of dental ceramics is essential for assessing their behavior. This study aimed to validate a custom load-to-fracture test for assessing fracture strength compared to a conventional method.
Materials and methods: Acoustic emission testing, a non-destructive (ND) lab test, was employed to evaluate the fracture toughness (FT) of brittle materials by capturing sound waves generated by crack formation in failing samples. A total of 130 samples, divided into three types (glass sheets, zirconia sheets, and monolithic zirconia crowns), were tested. The fracture loads were measured using both custom and conventional methods.
Results: The mean fracture loads for glass sheets were 650.46 N ± 110.38 (custom) compared to 691.41 N ± 155.92 (conventional). For zirconia sheets, the values were 95.25 N ± 7.78 (custom) vs 112.75 N ± 31.26 (conventional). Monolithic zirconia crowns showed mean fracture loads of 1108.99 N ± 327.89 (custom) compared to 1292.52 N ± 271.42 (conventional). Statistically significant differences were evident in all three types, indicating lower values with custom testing for all samples.
Conclusion: The custom testing demonstrated an advantage in identifying cracks at lower loads, thereby enhancing the accuracy of fracture load values. Despite its limitations, the study suggests that the custom setup could be a viable alternative to conventional fracture load testing of brittle materials. However, further testing with more materials is recommended to enhance the results' accuracy and generalizability.
Clinical significance: The findings indicate that the custom load-to-fracture test can provide more accurate measurements of FT in dental ceramics, which is crucial for predicting their clinical performance and longevity. How to cite this article: Haddad C, Eng JG, Zoghbi AE. The Acoustic Emission Testing in the Evaluation of Fracture Toughness of Brittle Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(7):617-623.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
