Subthreshold Micropulse Laser for Eyes With Center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema With Good Visual Acuity: The PULSE Study, a Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Samuel Feldman, Jesse Basra, Anjola Lawani, Yunyi Ren, Machelle Wilson, Ala Moshiri, Susanna S Park, Glenn Yiu
{"title":"Subthreshold Micropulse Laser for Eyes With Center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema With Good Visual Acuity: The PULSE Study, a Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Samuel Feldman, Jesse Basra, Anjola Lawani, Yunyi Ren, Machelle Wilson, Ala Moshiri, Susanna S Park, Glenn Yiu","doi":"10.3928/23258160-20240924-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>To determine if sub-threshold micropulse laser (SML) therapy can prevent or delay vision loss in diabetic macular edema (DME) with good visual acuity (VA).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Prospective, single-masked, sham-controlled trial in 27 eyes of 19 adult patients with treatment-naïve, center-involved DME, and VA of 20/25 or better. Measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low-luminance visual acuity (LLVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), average threshold on microperimetry, and central subfield thickness (CST). The primary outcome measure was median time to vision loss of 10 letters at any visit or 5 to 9 letters at two consecutive visits ≤ 28 days apart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight eyes met vision loss criteria during the 2-year study, with similar proportions for SML (<i>n</i> = 5) and sham (<i>n</i> = 3). Median time to vision loss was 5 months for both groups. At 6 months, there were no statistical differences in BCVA, LLVA, CS, microperimetry threshold, and CST between SML and sham arms (<i>P</i> > 0.05 in all measures).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In eyes with center-involved DME and good VA, SML did not prevent or delay the vision loss threshold for initiating anti-VEGF therapy. However, these results may be affected by a high rate of early participant dropout from the study. <b>[<i>Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina</i> 2024;55:XX-XX.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":19679,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20240924-03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: To determine if sub-threshold micropulse laser (SML) therapy can prevent or delay vision loss in diabetic macular edema (DME) with good visual acuity (VA).

Patients and methods: Prospective, single-masked, sham-controlled trial in 27 eyes of 19 adult patients with treatment-naïve, center-involved DME, and VA of 20/25 or better. Measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low-luminance visual acuity (LLVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), average threshold on microperimetry, and central subfield thickness (CST). The primary outcome measure was median time to vision loss of 10 letters at any visit or 5 to 9 letters at two consecutive visits ≤ 28 days apart.

Results: Eight eyes met vision loss criteria during the 2-year study, with similar proportions for SML (n = 5) and sham (n = 3). Median time to vision loss was 5 months for both groups. At 6 months, there were no statistical differences in BCVA, LLVA, CS, microperimetry threshold, and CST between SML and sham arms (P > 0.05 in all measures).

Conclusion: In eyes with center-involved DME and good VA, SML did not prevent or delay the vision loss threshold for initiating anti-VEGF therapy. However, these results may be affected by a high rate of early participant dropout from the study. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:XX-XX.].

阈下微脉冲激光治疗视力良好的中心性糖尿病黄斑水肿患者:随机临床试验 "PULSE 研究"。
背景和目的:确定阈下微脉冲激光(SML)疗法能否预防或延缓视力良好的糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者的视力损失:确定阈下微脉冲激光(SML)疗法能否预防或延缓视力(VA)良好的糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者的视力损失:前瞻性、单掩蔽、假对照试验:对19名成年患者的27只眼睛进行了试验,这些患者均患有未经治疗、中心参与的DME,视力为20/25或更佳。测量指标包括最佳矫正视力 (BCVA)、低亮度视力 (LLVA)、对比敏感度 (CS)、微透视平均阈值和中央子场厚度 (CST)。主要结果指标是在任何一次就诊时视力下降 10 个字母或连续两次就诊时视力下降 5 至 9 个字母(间隔时间不超过 28 天)的中位时间:结果:在为期 2 年的研究中,有 8 只眼睛达到了视力下降标准,SML(5 只)和假视力(3 只)的比例相似。两组视力丧失的中位时间均为 5 个月。6个月后,SML组和假手术组在BCVA、LLVA、CS、微观视力阈值和CST方面没有统计学差异(所有指标的P>0.05):结论:对于中心参与性 DME 和视力良好的患者,SML 不能阻止或延迟开始抗 VEGF 治疗的视力损失阈值。然而,这些结果可能会受到研究早期高辍学率的影响。[眼科手术激光成像视网膜2024;55:XX-XX]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: OSLI Retina focuses exclusively on retinal diseases, surgery and pharmacotherapy. OSLI Retina will offer an expedited submission to publication effort of peer-reviewed clinical science and case report articles. The front of the journal offers practical clinical and practice management features and columns specific to retina specialists. In sum, readers will find important peer-reviewed retina articles and the latest findings in techniques and science, as well as informative business and practice management features in one journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信