Probiotic Milk and Oat Beverages with Increased Protein Content: Survival of Probiotic Bacteria Under Simulated In Vitro Digestion Conditions.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrients Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.3390/nu16213673
Małgorzata Pawlos, Katarzyna Szajnar, Agata Znamirowska-Piotrowska
{"title":"Probiotic Milk and Oat Beverages with Increased Protein Content: Survival of Probiotic Bacteria Under Simulated In Vitro Digestion Conditions.","authors":"Małgorzata Pawlos, Katarzyna Szajnar, Agata Znamirowska-Piotrowska","doi":"10.3390/nu16213673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing prevalence of plant-based dietary preferences, driven by lactose intolerance, allergies, and adherence to vegan diets, has necessitated the exploration of alternative food matrices for probiotic delivery.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of whey protein isolate, pea protein isolate, and soy protein isolate on the viability of <i>L. casei</i> and <i>L. johnsonii</i> during simulated in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Furthermore, the study investigated the impact of two distinct matrices-cow's milk and an oat-based beverage-on the survival of these probiotic strains. Fermented products were prepared using cow's milk and an oat-based beverage as matrices, with simulated digestion performed following a seven-day storage period at 5 °C. The in vitro digestion model encompassed oral, gastric, and small intestinal phases, with probiotic viability assessed using the plate-deep method at each stage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Before digestion, <i>L. casei</i> exhibited higher populations than <i>L. johnsonii</i> in both matrices. Including 3% soy and pea protein, isolates promoted the growth of <i>L. casei</i> in both fermented milk and oat beverages. However, a marked reduction in probiotic viability was observed during the gastric phase, with <i>L. casei</i> counts decreasing by 6.4-7.8 log cfu g<sup>-1</sup> in fermented milk and 3.1-4 log cfu g<sup>-1</sup> in oat beverages, while <i>L. johnsonii</i> demonstrated similar reductions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings underscore the protective role of dairy components on probiotic viability, while the oat-based matrix exhibited a reduced capacity for sustaining probiotic populations throughout digestion. Future research should focus on optimizing plant-based matrices to enhance probiotic stability during gastrointestinal transit.</p>","PeriodicalId":19486,"journal":{"name":"Nutrients","volume":"16 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547824/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrients","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16213673","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increasing prevalence of plant-based dietary preferences, driven by lactose intolerance, allergies, and adherence to vegan diets, has necessitated the exploration of alternative food matrices for probiotic delivery.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of whey protein isolate, pea protein isolate, and soy protein isolate on the viability of L. casei and L. johnsonii during simulated in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Furthermore, the study investigated the impact of two distinct matrices-cow's milk and an oat-based beverage-on the survival of these probiotic strains. Fermented products were prepared using cow's milk and an oat-based beverage as matrices, with simulated digestion performed following a seven-day storage period at 5 °C. The in vitro digestion model encompassed oral, gastric, and small intestinal phases, with probiotic viability assessed using the plate-deep method at each stage.

Methods: Before digestion, L. casei exhibited higher populations than L. johnsonii in both matrices. Including 3% soy and pea protein, isolates promoted the growth of L. casei in both fermented milk and oat beverages. However, a marked reduction in probiotic viability was observed during the gastric phase, with L. casei counts decreasing by 6.4-7.8 log cfu g-1 in fermented milk and 3.1-4 log cfu g-1 in oat beverages, while L. johnsonii demonstrated similar reductions.

Conclusion: These findings underscore the protective role of dairy components on probiotic viability, while the oat-based matrix exhibited a reduced capacity for sustaining probiotic populations throughout digestion. Future research should focus on optimizing plant-based matrices to enhance probiotic stability during gastrointestinal transit.

蛋白质含量增加的益生菌牛奶和燕麦饮料:益生菌在模拟体外消化条件下的存活率
背景:受乳糖不耐症、过敏和坚持素食等因素的影响,以植物为基础的饮食偏好越来越普遍,因此有必要探索用于输送益生菌的替代食品基质:本研究旨在评估乳清蛋白分离物、豌豆蛋白分离物和大豆蛋白分离物在模拟体外胃肠道消化过程中对 L. casei 和 L. johnsonii 的活力的影响。此外,该研究还调查了两种不同基质(牛奶和燕麦饮料)对这些益生菌株存活率的影响。以牛奶和燕麦饮料为基质制备了发酵产品,并在 5 °C 下储存七天后进行了模拟消化。体外消化模型包括口腔、胃和小肠阶段,在每个阶段使用平板深度法评估益生菌的活力:消化前,在两种基质中,干酪乳杆菌的数量均高于约翰逊乳杆菌。含有 3% 大豆和豌豆蛋白的分离物在发酵牛奶和燕麦饮料中都能促进干酪乳杆菌的生长。然而,在胃肠道阶段,益生菌的活力明显下降,发酵牛奶中的干酪乳杆菌数量减少了 6.4-7.8 log cfu g-1,燕麦饮料中的干酪乳杆菌数量减少了 3.1-4 log cfu g-1,而约翰逊酵母菌的数量也有类似的减少:这些发现强调了乳制品成分对益生菌活力的保护作用,而燕麦基质在整个消化过程中维持益生菌种群的能力有所下降。未来的研究应侧重于优化植物基质,以提高益生菌在胃肠道转运过程中的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrients
Nutrients NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
15.30%
发文量
4599
审稿时长
16.74 days
期刊介绍: Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643) is an international, peer-reviewed open access advanced forum for studies related to Human Nutrition. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信