Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire: VioScreen-Allergy.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrients Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.3390/nu16213772
Kaci Pickett-Nairne, Deborah Glueck, Jessica Thomson, Rick Weiss, Kelly N Z Fuller, Stefka Fabbri, Claudia Schaefer, Courtney Evans, Emily Bowhay, Monica Martinez, Wendy Moore, David Fleischer, Carina Venter
{"title":"Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire: VioScreen-Allergy.","authors":"Kaci Pickett-Nairne, Deborah Glueck, Jessica Thomson, Rick Weiss, Kelly N Z Fuller, Stefka Fabbri, Claudia Schaefer, Courtney Evans, Emily Bowhay, Monica Martinez, Wendy Moore, David Fleischer, Carina Venter","doi":"10.3390/nu16213772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>An adapted version of an online pictorial food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), VioScreen-Allergy, assesses total dietary intake and intake of allergens and foods in the maternal diet index (MDI), linked to offspring allergy. This study assessed intermethod reliability, test-retest reliability, and external validity of the VioScreen-Allergy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Females of childbearing age were recruited at Denver Health and Children's Hospital, Colorado, USA, and were asked to complete four 24 h recalls and two VioScreen-Allergy FFQs over the course of a month. All those with at least two 24 h dietary recalls and both VioScreen-Allergy assessments were analyzed. Energy-adjusted and non-adjusted linear mixed models (1) compared MDI scores and intake of nutrients and allergens as measures of intermethod reliability; (2) evaluated VioScreen-Allergy test-retest reliability as differences between repeated measurements; and (3) assessed external validity by modeling associations between VioScreen-Allergy-derived intake of beta-carotene and orange vegetables and Veggie Meter<sup>®</sup>-assessed skin carotenoids. Bonferroni corrections controlled multiple comparisons within the assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 53 participants enrolled, 25 demographically dissimilar participants were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences between 24 h recall and VioScreen-Allergy mean intakes of macronutrients, micronutrients, allergens, or MDI, except for Vitamin C, niacin, and cashew allergen protein. There were no significant differences between repeated measurements of VioScreen-Allergy, either energy-adjusted or unadjusted. Both beta-carotene and orange vegetable servings were significantly associated with Veggie Meter<sup>®</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although non-significance could have been due to low power, clinical as well as statistical assessments of intermethod reliability, test-retest reliability, and external validity suggest that VioScreen-Allergy has reasonable utility for trials assessing food allergens and MDI in the context of overall intake. The VioScreen questionnaire can also be used in future studies to assess macro- and micronutrient intake. Additional validation studies assessing different portion sizes and foods eaten by infants and young children are currently undergoing.</p>","PeriodicalId":19486,"journal":{"name":"Nutrients","volume":"16 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrients","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16213772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: An adapted version of an online pictorial food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), VioScreen-Allergy, assesses total dietary intake and intake of allergens and foods in the maternal diet index (MDI), linked to offspring allergy. This study assessed intermethod reliability, test-retest reliability, and external validity of the VioScreen-Allergy.

Methods: Females of childbearing age were recruited at Denver Health and Children's Hospital, Colorado, USA, and were asked to complete four 24 h recalls and two VioScreen-Allergy FFQs over the course of a month. All those with at least two 24 h dietary recalls and both VioScreen-Allergy assessments were analyzed. Energy-adjusted and non-adjusted linear mixed models (1) compared MDI scores and intake of nutrients and allergens as measures of intermethod reliability; (2) evaluated VioScreen-Allergy test-retest reliability as differences between repeated measurements; and (3) assessed external validity by modeling associations between VioScreen-Allergy-derived intake of beta-carotene and orange vegetables and Veggie Meter®-assessed skin carotenoids. Bonferroni corrections controlled multiple comparisons within the assessment.

Results: Of 53 participants enrolled, 25 demographically dissimilar participants were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences between 24 h recall and VioScreen-Allergy mean intakes of macronutrients, micronutrients, allergens, or MDI, except for Vitamin C, niacin, and cashew allergen protein. There were no significant differences between repeated measurements of VioScreen-Allergy, either energy-adjusted or unadjusted. Both beta-carotene and orange vegetable servings were significantly associated with Veggie Meter®.

Conclusions: Although non-significance could have been due to low power, clinical as well as statistical assessments of intermethod reliability, test-retest reliability, and external validity suggest that VioScreen-Allergy has reasonable utility for trials assessing food allergens and MDI in the context of overall intake. The VioScreen questionnaire can also be used in future studies to assess macro- and micronutrient intake. Additional validation studies assessing different portion sizes and foods eaten by infants and young children are currently undergoing.

食物频率问卷的验证:VioScreen-Allergy.
背景/目的:VioScreen-Allergy 是一种改编版的在线图解食物频率问卷(FFQ),用于评估与后代过敏症相关的总膳食摄入量、过敏原摄入量以及母亲膳食指数(MDI)中的食物。本研究评估了 VioScreen-Allergy 的方法间可靠性、重测可靠性和外部有效性:在美国科罗拉多州丹佛健康与儿童医院招募育龄女性,要求她们在一个月内完成四次 24 小时回忆和两次 VioScreen-Allergy FFQ。我们对所有至少进行了两次 24 小时膳食回顾和两次 VioScreen-Allergy 评估的人进行了分析。能量调整和非调整线性混合模型(1)比较了 MDI 分数以及营养素和过敏原的摄入量,以此来衡量方法间的可靠性;(2)评估了 VioScreen-Allergy 测试-再测可靠性,即重复测量之间的差异;以及(3)通过建立 VioScreen-Allergy 得出的β-胡萝卜素和橙色蔬菜摄入量与 Veggie Meter® 评估的皮肤类胡萝卜素之间的关联模型来评估外部有效性。Bonferroni 校正控制了评估中的多重比较:在 53 名参加者中,25 名人口统计学上不同的参加者被纳入分析。除维生素 C、烟酸和腰果过敏原蛋白外,24 小时回忆与 VioScreen-Allergy 的宏量营养素、微量营养素、过敏原或 MDI 平均摄入量之间没有明显差异。无论是能量调整还是未调整,VioScreen-Allergy 的重复测量结果之间均无明显差异。β-胡萝卜素和橙色蔬菜份量与 Veggie Meter® 均有显著相关性:尽管不显著可能是由于功率较低造成的,但对方法间可靠性、重复测试可靠性和外部有效性的临床和统计评估表明,VioScreen-Allergy 对于在总体摄入量的背景下评估食物过敏原和 MDI 的试验具有合理的实用性。在未来的研究中,VioScreen 问卷还可用于评估宏量营养素和微量营养素的摄入量。目前正在进行更多的验证研究,以评估不同份量的食物和婴幼儿食用的食物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrients
Nutrients NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
15.30%
发文量
4599
审稿时长
16.74 days
期刊介绍: Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643) is an international, peer-reviewed open access advanced forum for studies related to Human Nutrition. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信