Evaluation of ploidy and the DNA index by flow cytometry in central nervous system tumors: a review.

IF 2.6 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Fernandez-Sanchez David, Ramirez-Corona Juan Antonio, Perez-Becerra Jose de Jesus, Santana-Bejarano Uriel Francisco, Santana-Hernandez Jennifer, Corona-Rivera Alfredo, Rodriguez-Machuca Victor Ulises, Bobadilla-Morales Lucina
{"title":"Evaluation of ploidy and the DNA index by flow cytometry in central nervous system tumors: a review.","authors":"Fernandez-Sanchez David, Ramirez-Corona Juan Antonio, Perez-Becerra Jose de Jesus, Santana-Bejarano Uriel Francisco, Santana-Hernandez Jennifer, Corona-Rivera Alfredo, Rodriguez-Machuca Victor Ulises, Bobadilla-Morales Lucina","doi":"10.1007/s11033-024-10095-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on central nervous system tumors (CNSTs) has a significant impact on the diagnosis and prognosis of patients. Currently, CNSTs are classified according to the schema proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO), which considers clinical, histopathological, and molecular characteristics, highlighting the importance of tumor biology for accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment approaches. Despite these advances, assessing DNA ploidy-a marker of tumor aggressiveness-remains complex in CNSTs. This review investigates the utility of DNA index (DNAi) and DNA ploidy analysis by flow cytometry in diagnosing CNSTs and prognosing their outcomes. We systematically reviewed studies in the PubMed database from 1990 to the present using the keywords \"DNA Index\", \"Brain\", \"Flow cytometry\", and \"Ploidy\". We identified 151 studies, 36 of which met our inclusion criteria. We found considerable variation in sample sizes and methodological variation across the studies. Discrepancies between the reported DNAi and ploidy values were observed. Aneuploidy is generally associated with more aggressive tumors, although exceptions exist. Higher DNAi levels correlate with increased malignancy, notably in glioblastomas, astrocytomas, and meningiomas, whereas diploid astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas are associated with shorter survival rates. DNA ploidy assessment via flow cytometry could predict CNST behavior, yet methodological issues with tissue selection, adequate control samples, and technique variability remain. DNAi and ploidy assessments show promise as prognostic markers in CNSTs. However, the standardization of flow cytometry protocols and alignment with the current WHO classification schema are essential steps to integrate ploidy analysis in routine CNST assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":18755,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Biology Reports","volume":"51 1","pages":"1141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Biology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-024-10095-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on central nervous system tumors (CNSTs) has a significant impact on the diagnosis and prognosis of patients. Currently, CNSTs are classified according to the schema proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO), which considers clinical, histopathological, and molecular characteristics, highlighting the importance of tumor biology for accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment approaches. Despite these advances, assessing DNA ploidy-a marker of tumor aggressiveness-remains complex in CNSTs. This review investigates the utility of DNA index (DNAi) and DNA ploidy analysis by flow cytometry in diagnosing CNSTs and prognosing their outcomes. We systematically reviewed studies in the PubMed database from 1990 to the present using the keywords "DNA Index", "Brain", "Flow cytometry", and "Ploidy". We identified 151 studies, 36 of which met our inclusion criteria. We found considerable variation in sample sizes and methodological variation across the studies. Discrepancies between the reported DNAi and ploidy values were observed. Aneuploidy is generally associated with more aggressive tumors, although exceptions exist. Higher DNAi levels correlate with increased malignancy, notably in glioblastomas, astrocytomas, and meningiomas, whereas diploid astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas are associated with shorter survival rates. DNA ploidy assessment via flow cytometry could predict CNST behavior, yet methodological issues with tissue selection, adequate control samples, and technique variability remain. DNAi and ploidy assessments show promise as prognostic markers in CNSTs. However, the standardization of flow cytometry protocols and alignment with the current WHO classification schema are essential steps to integrate ploidy analysis in routine CNST assessment.

通过流式细胞术评估中枢神经系统肿瘤的倍性和 DNA 指数:综述。
对中枢神经系统肿瘤(CNST)的研究对患者的诊断和预后有着重要影响。目前,中枢神经系统肿瘤根据世界卫生组织(WHO)提出的模式进行分类,该模式考虑了临床、组织病理学和分子特征,突出了肿瘤生物学对准确诊断和最佳治疗方法的重要性。尽管取得了这些进展,但在中枢神经系统肿瘤中,DNA 倍性--肿瘤侵袭性的标志物--的评估仍然很复杂。本综述探讨了流式细胞术的DNA指数(DNAi)和DNA倍性分析在诊断中枢神经系统肿瘤和预后中的应用。我们以 "DNA 指数"、"脑"、"流式细胞术 "和 "倍性 "为关键词,系统回顾了 PubMed 数据库中 1990 年至今的研究。我们发现了 151 项研究,其中 36 项符合我们的纳入标准。我们发现这些研究的样本大小和方法差异很大。报告的 DNAi 和倍性值之间也存在差异。非整倍体通常与侵袭性更强的肿瘤相关,但也有例外。较高的DNAi水平与恶性程度的增加有关,特别是在胶质母细胞瘤、星形细胞瘤和脑膜瘤中,而二倍体星形细胞瘤和少突胶质瘤与较短的存活率有关。通过流式细胞术进行的DNA倍性评估可预测中性星形细胞瘤的行为,但在组织选择、充足的对照样本和技术变异性方面仍存在方法学问题。DNAi 和倍性评估有望成为 CNST 的预后标记。然而,要将倍性分析纳入常规 CNST 评估,流式细胞术方案的标准化和与当前世界卫生组织分类模式的一致性是必不可少的步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Biology Reports
Molecular Biology Reports 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1048
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Biology Reports publishes original research papers and review articles that demonstrate novel molecular and cellular findings in both eukaryotes (animals, plants, algae, funghi) and prokaryotes (bacteria and archaea).The journal publishes results of both fundamental and translational research as well as new techniques that advance experimental progress in the field and presents original research papers, short communications and (mini-) reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信