Efficacy of four internal fixation devices on femoral neck fractures in young adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Daotong Yuan, Zhimeng Zhang, Xu Wang, Wenjie Chang, Wenpeng Xie, Yongkui Zhang
{"title":"Efficacy of four internal fixation devices on femoral neck fractures in young adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Daotong Yuan, Zhimeng Zhang, Xu Wang, Wenjie Chang, Wenpeng Xie, Yongkui Zhang","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults is internal fixation. The high complication rate after femoral neck fracture greatly affects the life of patients. There are many internal fixation devices for femoral neck fracture, but each has its advantages and disadvantages. Our aim was to determine the best internal fixation for young people with femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched 5 databases from January, 2016 to December, 2023. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for quality using the RoB.2 and ROBINS-I scales, respectively. The network meta-analysis was conducted within a Bayesian framework utilizing a random effect model. Data analysis was performed using the \"multinma\" package within the R 4.2.0 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A network meta-analysis of 34 studies involving 2291 patients was conducted. Results indicated that the inverted triangular cannulated screws demonstrated the lowest intraoperative bleeding volume (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 0.8732) based on the SUCRA. The medial buttress plate (MBP) exhibited superior efficacy in improving the Harris hip score (SUCRA = 0.8465), reducing complications (SUCRA = 0.9251), and accelerating fracture healing time (SUCRA = 0.8111). Additionally, the femoral neck system was ranked highest in terms of operation time (SUCRA = 0.7749) and femoral neck shortening (SUCRA = 0.7933).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This network meta-analysis findings indicated that MBP resulted in superior postoperative hip function, reduced complication rate, faster fracture healing time. Considering the good physical condition of young adults, surgeon may consider utilizing MBP to achieve improved postoperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"103 45","pages":"e40265"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557037/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040265","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The primary treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults is internal fixation. The high complication rate after femoral neck fracture greatly affects the life of patients. There are many internal fixation devices for femoral neck fracture, but each has its advantages and disadvantages. Our aim was to determine the best internal fixation for young people with femoral neck fractures.

Methods: We searched 5 databases from January, 2016 to December, 2023. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for quality using the RoB.2 and ROBINS-I scales, respectively. The network meta-analysis was conducted within a Bayesian framework utilizing a random effect model. Data analysis was performed using the "multinma" package within the R 4.2.0 software.

Results: A network meta-analysis of 34 studies involving 2291 patients was conducted. Results indicated that the inverted triangular cannulated screws demonstrated the lowest intraoperative bleeding volume (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 0.8732) based on the SUCRA. The medial buttress plate (MBP) exhibited superior efficacy in improving the Harris hip score (SUCRA = 0.8465), reducing complications (SUCRA = 0.9251), and accelerating fracture healing time (SUCRA = 0.8111). Additionally, the femoral neck system was ranked highest in terms of operation time (SUCRA = 0.7749) and femoral neck shortening (SUCRA = 0.7933).

Conclusion: This network meta-analysis findings indicated that MBP resulted in superior postoperative hip function, reduced complication rate, faster fracture healing time. Considering the good physical condition of young adults, surgeon may consider utilizing MBP to achieve improved postoperative outcomes.

四种内固定装置对青壮年股骨颈骨折的疗效:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
背景:青壮年股骨颈骨折的主要治疗方法是内固定。股骨颈骨折后的并发症发生率很高,极大地影响了患者的生活。股骨颈骨折的内固定装置有很多,但各有利弊。我们的目的是确定年轻人股骨颈骨折的最佳内固定方法:我们检索了 2016 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间的 5 个数据库。符合纳入标准的随机对照试验和队列研究分别使用RoB.2和ROBINS-I量表进行了质量评估。网络荟萃分析在贝叶斯框架内利用随机效应模型进行。数据分析使用 R 4.2.0 软件中的 "multinma "软件包进行:结果:对涉及 2291 名患者的 34 项研究进行了网络荟萃分析。结果表明,根据 SUCRA,倒三角插管螺钉的术中出血量最少(累积排名曲线下表面 [SUCRA] = 0.8732)。内侧支撑钢板(MBP)在改善 Harris 髋关节评分(SUCRA = 0.8465)、减少并发症(SUCRA = 0.9251)和加快骨折愈合时间(SUCRA = 0.8111)方面表现出卓越的疗效。此外,股骨颈系统在手术时间(SUCRA = 0.7749)和股骨颈缩短(SUCRA = 0.7933)方面排名最高:该网络荟萃分析结果表明,MBP 术后髋关节功能更佳,并发症发生率更低,骨折愈合时间更快。考虑到年轻人的身体条件较好,外科医生可以考虑使用 MBP 来改善术后效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信