Combined fractional CO2 laser with topical tioconazole versus Q-switched Nd-YAG laser in the treatment of onychomycosis; a randomized comparative trial.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Khadiga Sayed, Manar Khaled, Abdallah Gad, Amira Elbendary
{"title":"Combined fractional CO2 laser with topical tioconazole versus Q-switched Nd-YAG laser in the treatment of onychomycosis; a randomized comparative trial.","authors":"Khadiga Sayed, Manar Khaled, Abdallah Gad, Amira Elbendary","doi":"10.1007/s10103-024-04214-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment of onychomycosis includes topical and systemic agents. However, prolonged use of oral treatment could cause adverse effects and topical antifungal agents have limited penetration. To compare the clinical efficacy and the safety of fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser combined with topical tioconazole nail solution versus Q-switched 1064 Nd: YAG laser in the treatment of fingernail onychomycosis. This randomized comparative clinical trial was conducted on 13 patients (47 nails) with fingernail onychomycosis. Patients were randomized to receive either fractional CO2 laser combined with topical tioconazole or Q-Switched Nd: YAG 1064 nm laser every 2 weeks for 3 months followed by a 1-month follow up assessment. Onychomycosis severity index (OSI) score, Dermatology life Quality Index (DLQI) score, patient satisfaction score, dermoscopic evaluation and KOH examination were used for assessment of improvement. OSI showed improvement after treatment in both arms (from 16.17 to 10.92 in fractional CO2 arm (p = 0.026) and 23.13 to 22.43 (p = 0.92)). When comparing both groups OSI score significantly reduced in the fractional CO2 laser combined with tioconazole more than the Q-switched laser group (p = 0.002). The mean DLQI score significantly improved in both groups but no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Significant improvement in patient satisfaction score was noted in both groups. Mycological cure using KOH examination was detected in both groups (44.4% in the CO2 group and 56.5% in the Q-switched group) with no significant difference (P value < 0.05). Ruin pattern keratosis found to be the most dermoscopic pattern to be associated with poor OSI score improvement. Fractional CO2 laser combined with topical tioconazole is more efficient in treatment of onychomycosis than Q-Switched Nd: YAG 1064 nm laser group as regards clinical improvement but both have comparable effect on mycological cure. Their use as adjuvant treatment rather than alone is recommended to ensure mycological cure in onychomycosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04214-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment of onychomycosis includes topical and systemic agents. However, prolonged use of oral treatment could cause adverse effects and topical antifungal agents have limited penetration. To compare the clinical efficacy and the safety of fractional CO2 laser combined with topical tioconazole nail solution versus Q-switched 1064 Nd: YAG laser in the treatment of fingernail onychomycosis. This randomized comparative clinical trial was conducted on 13 patients (47 nails) with fingernail onychomycosis. Patients were randomized to receive either fractional CO2 laser combined with topical tioconazole or Q-Switched Nd: YAG 1064 nm laser every 2 weeks for 3 months followed by a 1-month follow up assessment. Onychomycosis severity index (OSI) score, Dermatology life Quality Index (DLQI) score, patient satisfaction score, dermoscopic evaluation and KOH examination were used for assessment of improvement. OSI showed improvement after treatment in both arms (from 16.17 to 10.92 in fractional CO2 arm (p = 0.026) and 23.13 to 22.43 (p = 0.92)). When comparing both groups OSI score significantly reduced in the fractional CO2 laser combined with tioconazole more than the Q-switched laser group (p = 0.002). The mean DLQI score significantly improved in both groups but no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Significant improvement in patient satisfaction score was noted in both groups. Mycological cure using KOH examination was detected in both groups (44.4% in the CO2 group and 56.5% in the Q-switched group) with no significant difference (P value < 0.05). Ruin pattern keratosis found to be the most dermoscopic pattern to be associated with poor OSI score improvement. Fractional CO2 laser combined with topical tioconazole is more efficient in treatment of onychomycosis than Q-Switched Nd: YAG 1064 nm laser group as regards clinical improvement but both have comparable effect on mycological cure. Their use as adjuvant treatment rather than alone is recommended to ensure mycological cure in onychomycosis.

治疗甲癣的二氧化碳点阵激光联合外用替康唑与 Q 开关 Nd-YAG 激光的随机比较试验。
治疗甲癣的方法包括局部用药和全身用药。然而,长期口服治疗可能会产生不良反应,而且外用抗真菌剂的渗透力有限。目的:比较点阵 CO2 激光联合局部使用替康唑甲溶液与调 Q 开关 1064 Nd: YAG 激光治疗甲癣的临床疗效和安全性。这项随机比较临床试验针对 13 名甲癣患者(47 枚指甲)进行。患者被随机分配接受二氧化碳点阵激光联合局部用药替康唑或 Q 开关 Nd:YAG 1064 nm 激光治疗,每两周一次,持续 3 个月,然后进行为期 1 个月的随访评估。在评估改善情况时,采用了甲癣严重程度指数(OSI)评分、皮肤科生活质量指数(DLQI)评分、患者满意度评分、皮肤镜评估和 KOH 检查。治疗后,两组患者的 OSI 均有改善(点阵 CO2 治疗组从 16.17 降至 10.92(P = 0.026),点阵 CO2 治疗组从 23.13 降至 22.43(P = 0.92))。两组相比,点阵 CO2 激光联合替康唑组的 OSI 评分明显降低,高于调 Q 激光组(p = 0.002)。两组的 DLQI 平均得分均有明显改善,但两组间无统计学差异。两组患者的满意度评分均有明显改善。通过 KOH 检查,两组患者的霉菌学治愈率(CO2 组 44.4%,Q-开关组 56.5%)均无明显差异(P=0.002)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信