Association between physical activity patterns of working-age adults and social jetlag, depressive symptoms, and presenteeism.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jaehoon Seol, Rina So, Fumiko Murai, Tomoaki Matsuo
{"title":"Association between physical activity patterns of working-age adults and social jetlag, depressive symptoms, and presenteeism.","authors":"Jaehoon Seol, Rina So, Fumiko Murai, Tomoaki Matsuo","doi":"10.1093/joccuh/uiae068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the association of physical activity with social jetlag, depressive symptoms, and presenteeism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 8,247 working-age adults (females, 44.6%; age, 20-64 years). Social jetlag was defined as the absolute difference between the midpoint of bedtime and wake time on workdays and free days. Depression symptoms were assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and presenteeism was evaluated using the Work Functioning Impairment Scale. Exercise habits were classified into four groups based on the World Health Organization guidelines: non-active (NA; n=4,223), insufficiently active (IA; n=3,009: exercise below guideline levels), weekend warriors (WW; n=220: exercise 1-2 times per week meeting guideline levels), and regularly active (RA; n=793: exercise at least 3 days per week meeting guideline levels). Using multiple and Poisson regression analyses, we examined the association between exercise habits and each outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Social jetlag, depression, and presenteeism were more favorable with shorter sedentary times and longer durations of moderate- and vigorous-intensity exercise. Compared with the RA group, the NA group had a significantly higher prevalence of social jetlag (prevalence ratio [PR]=1.30), depression (PR=1.31), and presenteeism (PR=1.35). The IA group had a significantly higher prevalence of depression (PR=1.33) and presenteeism (PR=1.38).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Exercising with a certain frequency and intensity may help prevent symptoms of depression and social jetlag, and consequently prevent presenteeism.</p>","PeriodicalId":16632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiae068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the association of physical activity with social jetlag, depressive symptoms, and presenteeism.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 8,247 working-age adults (females, 44.6%; age, 20-64 years). Social jetlag was defined as the absolute difference between the midpoint of bedtime and wake time on workdays and free days. Depression symptoms were assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and presenteeism was evaluated using the Work Functioning Impairment Scale. Exercise habits were classified into four groups based on the World Health Organization guidelines: non-active (NA; n=4,223), insufficiently active (IA; n=3,009: exercise below guideline levels), weekend warriors (WW; n=220: exercise 1-2 times per week meeting guideline levels), and regularly active (RA; n=793: exercise at least 3 days per week meeting guideline levels). Using multiple and Poisson regression analyses, we examined the association between exercise habits and each outcome.

Results: Social jetlag, depression, and presenteeism were more favorable with shorter sedentary times and longer durations of moderate- and vigorous-intensity exercise. Compared with the RA group, the NA group had a significantly higher prevalence of social jetlag (prevalence ratio [PR]=1.30), depression (PR=1.31), and presenteeism (PR=1.35). The IA group had a significantly higher prevalence of depression (PR=1.33) and presenteeism (PR=1.38).

Conclusions: Exercising with a certain frequency and intensity may help prevent symptoms of depression and social jetlag, and consequently prevent presenteeism.

工作年龄成年人的体育活动模式与社会时差、抑郁症状和旷工之间的关系。
研究目的本研究旨在评估体育锻炼与社会时差、抑郁症状和旷工的关系:这项横断面研究包括 8247 名工作年龄的成年人(女性,44.6%;年龄,20-64 岁)。社会时差被定义为工作日和空闲日睡觉时间和起床时间中点之间的绝对差值。抑郁症状采用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表进行评估,旷工情况采用工作功能障碍量表进行评估。运动习惯根据世界卫生组织的指南分为四组:不运动(NA;人数=4223)、运动不足(IA;人数=3009:运动量低于指南水平)、周末战士(WW;人数=220:每周运动1-2次,达到指南水平)和经常运动(RA;人数=793:每周至少运动3天,达到指南水平)。我们使用多元和泊松回归分析,研究了运动习惯与各项结果之间的关联:结果:久坐时间越短、中强度和高强度运动持续时间越长,越有利于社交时差、抑郁和旷工。与 RA 组相比,NA 组的社交时差(患病率比 [PR]=1.30)、抑郁(PR=1.31)和旷工(PR=1.35)发生率明显更高。而 IA 组的抑郁率(PR=1.33)和旷工率(PR=1.38)明显更高:结论:一定频率和强度的锻炼有助于预防抑郁症状和社交时差,从而防止旷工。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Health
Journal of Occupational Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal is broad, covering toxicology, ergonomics, psychosocial factors and other relevant health issues of workers, with special emphasis on the current developments in occupational health. The JOH also accepts various methodologies that are relevant to investigation of occupational health risk factors and exposures, such as large-scale epidemiological studies, human studies employing biological techniques and fundamental experiments on animals, and also welcomes submissions concerning occupational health practices and related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信