Andrea L Rosso, Kyle D Moored, Alyson B Harding, Stephanie Studenski, Todd Bear, Geeta Acharya, Caterina Rosano
{"title":"What Characteristics Modify the Relation of Neighborhood Walkability and Walking Behavior in Older Adults?","authors":"Andrea L Rosso, Kyle D Moored, Alyson B Harding, Stephanie Studenski, Todd Bear, Geeta Acharya, Caterina Rosano","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igae095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Neighborhood walkability can influence walking behaviors in older adults. However, its associations of walkability with walking may differ by demographic, socioeconomic, health, social, and residential characteristics due to factors such as increased vulnerability to environmental factors or increased resilience.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In a sample of older adults (<i>n</i> = 493, median age = 82 [range 78-89], 56% female, 31% Black), a walkability index was derived from audits of Google Street View images of participants' immediate neighborhoods. Walking was self-reported in the past week. Effect modifiers by demographic (age, race, gender, marital status), socioeconomic (education, income), health (gait speed, falls, knee pain, depressive symptoms, cognitive status, perceived energy), social (driving status, social engagement), and residential/neighborhood (residence type, neighborhood socioeconomic status [SES], population density) characteristics were assessed by interaction terms in logistic regression models, adjusted for gender, race, gait speed, prior falls, high depressive symptoms, currently driving, and cognitive status. When effect modification was suggested (<i>p</i> for interaction <.1), adjusted analyses of walkability with walking stratified on the effect modifier were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this sample, 59% walked in the past week and greater walkability was associated with greater odds of walking (odds ratio [OR] = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.34). This association (<i>p</i> for interaction range 0.002-0.07) was present for those who were not currently married (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.17-1.56), who reported knee pain (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.72) or high depressive symptoms (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06-1.60), or who had declining cognitive function (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.09-1.55).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>High walkability may influence physical activity, particularly for those with vulnerabilities related to social, pain, and brain health characteristics. These results should inform neighborhood planning and targeted interventions for vulnerable older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"8 11","pages":"igae095"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Neighborhood walkability can influence walking behaviors in older adults. However, its associations of walkability with walking may differ by demographic, socioeconomic, health, social, and residential characteristics due to factors such as increased vulnerability to environmental factors or increased resilience.
Research design and methods: In a sample of older adults (n = 493, median age = 82 [range 78-89], 56% female, 31% Black), a walkability index was derived from audits of Google Street View images of participants' immediate neighborhoods. Walking was self-reported in the past week. Effect modifiers by demographic (age, race, gender, marital status), socioeconomic (education, income), health (gait speed, falls, knee pain, depressive symptoms, cognitive status, perceived energy), social (driving status, social engagement), and residential/neighborhood (residence type, neighborhood socioeconomic status [SES], population density) characteristics were assessed by interaction terms in logistic regression models, adjusted for gender, race, gait speed, prior falls, high depressive symptoms, currently driving, and cognitive status. When effect modification was suggested (p for interaction <.1), adjusted analyses of walkability with walking stratified on the effect modifier were conducted.
Results: In this sample, 59% walked in the past week and greater walkability was associated with greater odds of walking (odds ratio [OR] = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.34). This association (p for interaction range 0.002-0.07) was present for those who were not currently married (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.17-1.56), who reported knee pain (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.72) or high depressive symptoms (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06-1.60), or who had declining cognitive function (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.09-1.55).
Discussion and implications: High walkability may influence physical activity, particularly for those with vulnerabilities related to social, pain, and brain health characteristics. These results should inform neighborhood planning and targeted interventions for vulnerable older adults.
期刊介绍:
Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.