A cross-sectional study of stigma towards opioid users among rural law enforcement and community members in tennessee.

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Kahler W Stone, Gabrielle M Chesak, Angela S Bowman, Michael Ayalon, Cynthia Chafin
{"title":"A cross-sectional study of stigma towards opioid users among rural law enforcement and community members in tennessee.","authors":"Kahler W Stone, Gabrielle M Chesak, Angela S Bowman, Michael Ayalon, Cynthia Chafin","doi":"10.1186/s12954-024-01114-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The U.S. opioid crisis, resulting in nearly 500,000 deaths from 1999 to 2019, has been exacerbated by persistent stigma, which hinders treatment and recovery efforts. This stigma, whether structural, social, or self-imposed, challenges overdose prevention and recovery. Our study aimed to assess and compare levels of stigma towards opioid users among rural law enforcement officers (LEOs) and community members in Tennessee, highlighting rural community-level attitudes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Methods involved surveying two groups: LEOs (N=48) and community members (N=393). Utilizing a Likert Scale based on prior research, the survey probed attitudes toward drug use across four stigma domains: dangerousness, blame, social distancing, and fatalism. Analysis employed standardized scoring and ANOVA for evaluating stigma differences by participant characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LEOs (75%) and community members (51.7%) predominantly identify drug users as white, with varied perceptions regarding socioeconomic status and employment. Despite similar perceptions, normalized stigma scores revealed statistical differences between groups across stigma domains. ANOVA found no significant impact of participant type or gender on stigma levels, though race/ethnicity and its interaction with gender suggested potential influences on overall stigma score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both LEOs and community members in rural Tennessee hold measurable stigma against opioid users, spanning dangerousness, blame, social distancing, and fatalism domains. These insights highlight the need for further research into both professional and public attitudes toward individuals with opioid or other substance use disorders within shared communities. This research should aim to develop specific stigma-reducing interventions that target both providers and community members.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"195"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01114-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The U.S. opioid crisis, resulting in nearly 500,000 deaths from 1999 to 2019, has been exacerbated by persistent stigma, which hinders treatment and recovery efforts. This stigma, whether structural, social, or self-imposed, challenges overdose prevention and recovery. Our study aimed to assess and compare levels of stigma towards opioid users among rural law enforcement officers (LEOs) and community members in Tennessee, highlighting rural community-level attitudes.

Methods: Methods involved surveying two groups: LEOs (N=48) and community members (N=393). Utilizing a Likert Scale based on prior research, the survey probed attitudes toward drug use across four stigma domains: dangerousness, blame, social distancing, and fatalism. Analysis employed standardized scoring and ANOVA for evaluating stigma differences by participant characteristics.

Results: LEOs (75%) and community members (51.7%) predominantly identify drug users as white, with varied perceptions regarding socioeconomic status and employment. Despite similar perceptions, normalized stigma scores revealed statistical differences between groups across stigma domains. ANOVA found no significant impact of participant type or gender on stigma levels, though race/ethnicity and its interaction with gender suggested potential influences on overall stigma score.

Conclusions: Both LEOs and community members in rural Tennessee hold measurable stigma against opioid users, spanning dangerousness, blame, social distancing, and fatalism domains. These insights highlight the need for further research into both professional and public attitudes toward individuals with opioid or other substance use disorders within shared communities. This research should aim to develop specific stigma-reducing interventions that target both providers and community members.

田纳西州农村执法人员和社区成员对阿片类药物使用者的污名化横断面研究。
背景:从 1999 年到 2019 年,美国阿片类药物危机导致近 50 万人死亡,而持续存在的污名化问题则加剧了这一危机,阻碍了治疗和康复工作。这种污名化,无论是结构性的、社会性的,还是自我强加的,都对用药过量预防和康复提出了挑战。我们的研究旨在评估和比较田纳西州农村执法人员(LEOs)和社区成员对阿片类药物使用者的成见程度,突出农村社区层面的态度:方法:对两组人进行调查:执法人员(48 人)和社区成员(393 人)。调查采用基于先前研究的李克特量表,从危险性、责备、社会疏远和宿命论四个污名领域来探究人们对吸毒的态度。分析采用了标准化评分和方差分析,以评估不同参与者的成见差异:结果:地方执法人员(75%)和社区成员(51.7%)主要认为吸毒者是白人,对其社会经济地位和就业情况的看法各不相同。尽管看法相似,但归一化的污名化得分显示出各组之间在污名化领域的统计差异。方差分析发现,参与者类型或性别对污名化水平没有明显影响,但种族/族裔及其与性别的交互作用对污名化总分有潜在影响:田纳西州农村地区的地方执法人员和社区成员都对阿片类药物使用者持有可衡量的成见,包括危险性、指责、社会疏远和宿命论等方面。这些见解突出表明,有必要进一步研究专业人员和公众对共同社区内阿片类药物或其他药物使用失调患者的态度。这项研究的目的应该是针对提供者和社区成员制定具体的减少污名化的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信