The causal role of gastroesophageal reflux disease in endometriosis: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1440157
Zunlin Shi, Zhi Li, Kana Wang, Fan Yang
{"title":"The causal role of gastroesophageal reflux disease in endometriosis: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Zunlin Shi, Zhi Li, Kana Wang, Fan Yang","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1440157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Observational studies have reported an association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and endometriosis. We conducted a two-sample and bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis to determine whether those associations are causal. Two-sample and bidirectional MR analyses were performed using summary statistics from the European Individual Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS). The inverse variance weighting (IVW) method is used as the main analysis method to evaluate causality. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess heterogeneity, horizontal versatility, and stability. The results showed no significant causal association between GERD in women with endometriosis in the UK Bank database [ratio (OR) ≈ 0, 95% adjusted interval (CI) 1.0007∼1.0044, <i>P</i> = 0.006] and Finn databases [ratio (OR) = 1.29, 95% adjusted interval (CI) 0.99∼1.67, <i>P</i> = 0.06]. However, when studying the Finn database only for endometriosis, which is confined to the uterus, a significant increase in GERD was limited to the risk of endometriosis in the uterus [ratio (OR) = 1.47, 95% adjusted interval (CI) 1.00∼2.17, <i>P</i> = 0.05]. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust and did not detect multi efficacy or heterogeneity. Meanwhile, reverse MR analysis showed that endometriosis did not increase the risk of GERD. This MR study supports a causal relationship between GERD and an increased risk of endometriosis confined to the uterus. Therefore, patients with gastric esophageal reflux should be treated with gynecological examination to avoid and prevent the development of endometriosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1440157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1440157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Observational studies have reported an association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and endometriosis. We conducted a two-sample and bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis to determine whether those associations are causal. Two-sample and bidirectional MR analyses were performed using summary statistics from the European Individual Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS). The inverse variance weighting (IVW) method is used as the main analysis method to evaluate causality. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess heterogeneity, horizontal versatility, and stability. The results showed no significant causal association between GERD in women with endometriosis in the UK Bank database [ratio (OR) ≈ 0, 95% adjusted interval (CI) 1.0007∼1.0044, P = 0.006] and Finn databases [ratio (OR) = 1.29, 95% adjusted interval (CI) 0.99∼1.67, P = 0.06]. However, when studying the Finn database only for endometriosis, which is confined to the uterus, a significant increase in GERD was limited to the risk of endometriosis in the uterus [ratio (OR) = 1.47, 95% adjusted interval (CI) 1.00∼2.17, P = 0.05]. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust and did not detect multi efficacy or heterogeneity. Meanwhile, reverse MR analysis showed that endometriosis did not increase the risk of GERD. This MR study supports a causal relationship between GERD and an increased risk of endometriosis confined to the uterus. Therefore, patients with gastric esophageal reflux should be treated with gynecological examination to avoid and prevent the development of endometriosis.

胃食管反流病在子宫内膜异位症中的因果作用:一项双向孟德尔随机研究。
有观察性研究报告称,胃食管反流病(GERD)与子宫内膜异位症之间存在关联。我们进行了双样本和双向孟德尔随机分析,以确定这些关联是否存在因果关系。我们使用欧洲个体全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的汇总统计数据进行了双样本和双向孟德尔随机分析。反方差加权(IVW)法是评估因果关系的主要分析方法。为评估异质性、水平通用性和稳定性,进行了敏感性分析。结果显示,在英国银行数据库[比值比(OR)≈0,95% 调整区间(CI)1.0007∼1.0044,P = 0.006]和芬兰数据库[比值比(OR)= 1.29,95% 调整区间(CI)0.99∼1.67,P = 0.06]中,患有子宫内膜异位症的女性胃食管反流病之间没有明显的因果关系。然而,在芬兰数据库中仅研究子宫内膜异位症(仅限于子宫)时,胃食管反流病的显著增加仅限于子宫内膜异位症的风险[比值比(OR)= 1.47,95% 调整区间(CI)1.00∼2.17,P = 0.05]。敏感性分析表明,结果是稳健的,没有发现多重疗效或异质性。同时,反向 MR 分析表明,子宫内膜异位症不会增加胃食管反流病的风险。这项磁共振研究支持胃食管反流病与子宫内膜异位症风险增加之间的因果关系。因此,胃食管反流患者应接受妇科检查,以避免和预防子宫内膜异位症的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信