Global research trends in endometrial receptivity from 2000 to 2024: bibliometric analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1465893
Ziping Liu, Zelin Zhang, Ping Xie
{"title":"Global research trends in endometrial receptivity from 2000 to 2024: bibliometric analysis.","authors":"Ziping Liu, Zelin Zhang, Ping Xie","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1465893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, extensive research has been conducted on endometrial receptivity (ER), with rapidly evolving research hotspots and trends. Our study aimed to explore the development of ER research from 2000 to the present and provide insights for future endeavors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Relevant research publications on ER from 2000 to 2024 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) database. CiteSpace, VOSviewer and Excel tools were employed to conduct the bibliometric analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,354 articles were analyzed, revealing an overall upward trend in annual publication numbers, signifying the increasing attractiveness and research value of this field. Globally, China led with a notable advantage of 1,030 publications, followed by the United States (650) and Spain (251), constituting the first tier of international research. Valencia University topped the list of institutions with 108 publications, closely followed by Shanghai Jiao Tong University with 87. <i>Fertility and Sterility</i> (IF6.6, Q1) is the one with the largest number of publications, accounting for 7.96% of the total publications. The three most co-cited journals were <i>Fertility and Sterility</i>, <i>Biology of Reproduction</i>, and <i>Human Reproduction</i>. A co-citation reference analysis revealed that ER research can be categorized into ten major subfields, including embryo implantation, frozen embryo transfer, integrins, recurrent implantation failure, intrauterine adhesions, etc. Since 2020, the keywords with the strongest citation bursts include repeated implantation failure and frozen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study employs bibliometric analysis to offer researchers in the field of ER a comprehensive perspective. Since 2000, there has been a remarkable surge in the number of publications in the ER research field. These studies primarily concentrate on delving into the pathophysiological mechanisms of ER, with the primary objective of enhancing clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates, benefiting more infertile patients. Currently, addressing the ER issues in patients with recurrent implantation failure represents the forefront of research. The primary treatment approaches currently in use involve optimizing embryo transfer timing and employing innovative strategies such as immunotherapy. These cutting-edge analyses not only provide new insights into the treatment of ER but also offer researchers fresh research directions, and staying abreast of the latest trends and advancements in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1465893"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1465893","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent years, extensive research has been conducted on endometrial receptivity (ER), with rapidly evolving research hotspots and trends. Our study aimed to explore the development of ER research from 2000 to the present and provide insights for future endeavors.

Materials and methods: Relevant research publications on ER from 2000 to 2024 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) database. CiteSpace, VOSviewer and Excel tools were employed to conduct the bibliometric analysis.

Results: A total of 3,354 articles were analyzed, revealing an overall upward trend in annual publication numbers, signifying the increasing attractiveness and research value of this field. Globally, China led with a notable advantage of 1,030 publications, followed by the United States (650) and Spain (251), constituting the first tier of international research. Valencia University topped the list of institutions with 108 publications, closely followed by Shanghai Jiao Tong University with 87. Fertility and Sterility (IF6.6, Q1) is the one with the largest number of publications, accounting for 7.96% of the total publications. The three most co-cited journals were Fertility and Sterility, Biology of Reproduction, and Human Reproduction. A co-citation reference analysis revealed that ER research can be categorized into ten major subfields, including embryo implantation, frozen embryo transfer, integrins, recurrent implantation failure, intrauterine adhesions, etc. Since 2020, the keywords with the strongest citation bursts include repeated implantation failure and frozen.

Conclusion: This study employs bibliometric analysis to offer researchers in the field of ER a comprehensive perspective. Since 2000, there has been a remarkable surge in the number of publications in the ER research field. These studies primarily concentrate on delving into the pathophysiological mechanisms of ER, with the primary objective of enhancing clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates, benefiting more infertile patients. Currently, addressing the ER issues in patients with recurrent implantation failure represents the forefront of research. The primary treatment approaches currently in use involve optimizing embryo transfer timing and employing innovative strategies such as immunotherapy. These cutting-edge analyses not only provide new insights into the treatment of ER but also offer researchers fresh research directions, and staying abreast of the latest trends and advancements in the field.

2000 年至 2024 年子宫内膜受孕率的全球研究趋势:文献计量分析。
背景:近年来,有关子宫内膜接受性(ER)的研究广泛开展,研究热点和趋势发展迅速。我们的研究旨在探讨2000年至今子宫内膜接受性研究的发展情况,并为今后的工作提供启示:我们从 Web of Science Core Collection(WOSCC)数据库中检索了 2000 年至 2024 年有关 ER 的相关研究出版物。采用 CiteSpace、VOSviewer 和 Excel 工具进行文献计量分析:结果:共分析了 3,354 篇文章,发现每年发表的文章数量总体呈上升趋势,这表明该领域的吸引力和研究价值在不断提高。在全球范围内,中国以 1,030 篇论文的显著优势遥遥领先,美国(650 篇)和西班牙(251 篇)紧随其后,构成了国际研究的第一梯队。瓦伦西亚大学以 108 篇论文位居榜首,上海交通大学以 87 篇紧随其后。生育与不育》(IF6.6,第一季度)是发表论文数量最多的期刊,占论文总数的 7.96%。被联合引用最多的三种期刊是《生育与不育》、《生殖生物学》和《人类生殖》。联合引用参考文献分析显示,胚胎植入研究可分为十大子领域,包括胚胎植入、冷冻胚胎移植、整合素、复发性植入失败、宫内粘连等。自 2020 年以来,被引频次最高的关键词包括反复植入失败和冷冻:本研究采用文献计量学分析方法,为 ER 领域的研究人员提供了一个全面的视角。自 2000 年以来,ER 研究领域的论文数量激增。这些研究主要集中在对ER的病理生理机制进行深入探讨,主要目的是提高临床妊娠率和活产率,让更多不孕不育患者受益。目前,解决反复植入失败患者的 ER 问题是研究的前沿。目前使用的主要治疗方法包括优化胚胎移植时机和采用免疫疗法等创新策略。这些前沿分析不仅为ER的治疗提供了新的见解,还为研究人员提供了新的研究方向,并紧跟该领域的最新趋势和进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信