A severity comparison of leukoaraiosis in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke: a retrospective study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2024-10-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2024.1425440
Bendik Søfteland, Nedim Leto, Halvor Næss
{"title":"A severity comparison of leukoaraiosis in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke: a retrospective study.","authors":"Bendik Søfteland, Nedim Leto, Halvor Næss","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2024.1425440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Leukoaraiosis (LA) is a common neuroradiological finding in patients suffering from stroke. Cerebral small-vessel disease (SVD) is one of the primary causes of both ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke (intracerebral hemorrhage, ICH) and the development of LA. Significant evidence that LA predicts the risk of functional dependency and mortality exists. However, studies examining the difference in LA severity between ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke are lacking. We therefore aimed to compare the severity and abundance of LA in the two stroke subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients admitted to the Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, with an ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhagic (ICH) stroke diagnosed between 2006 and 2020 were included in the study. We collected patient data on risk factors and clinical and radiological findings and outcomes from our local stroke registry. The presence and severity of LA were assessed using the Fazekas score based on CT imaging. We evaluated the outcome using the modified Rankin Score (mRS) 7 days post-stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5,084 patients were included in our analyses: 4437 (87%) with ischemic stroke and 647 (13%) with ICH. LA was present in 2476 (45%) patients. In our ordinal logistic regression model, adjusting for age, sex, known hypertension, known diabetes mellitus, and smoking, LA was more severe and more abundant in ICH patients compared to ischemic stroke patients (Fazekas score: 1, OR: 1.54; Fazekas score: 2, OR: 1.88; and Fazekas score: 3, OR 2.13; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Increasing severity of LA was associated with worse functional outcomes in both groups (ischemic stroke, OR: 1.49; <i>p</i> < 0.001 and ICH, OR: 1.36; <i>p</i> < 0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, LA was more severe and abundant in patients with ICH.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1425440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11550968/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1425440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Leukoaraiosis (LA) is a common neuroradiological finding in patients suffering from stroke. Cerebral small-vessel disease (SVD) is one of the primary causes of both ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke (intracerebral hemorrhage, ICH) and the development of LA. Significant evidence that LA predicts the risk of functional dependency and mortality exists. However, studies examining the difference in LA severity between ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke are lacking. We therefore aimed to compare the severity and abundance of LA in the two stroke subgroups.

Methods: All patients admitted to the Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, with an ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhagic (ICH) stroke diagnosed between 2006 and 2020 were included in the study. We collected patient data on risk factors and clinical and radiological findings and outcomes from our local stroke registry. The presence and severity of LA were assessed using the Fazekas score based on CT imaging. We evaluated the outcome using the modified Rankin Score (mRS) 7 days post-stroke.

Results: A total of 5,084 patients were included in our analyses: 4437 (87%) with ischemic stroke and 647 (13%) with ICH. LA was present in 2476 (45%) patients. In our ordinal logistic regression model, adjusting for age, sex, known hypertension, known diabetes mellitus, and smoking, LA was more severe and more abundant in ICH patients compared to ischemic stroke patients (Fazekas score: 1, OR: 1.54; Fazekas score: 2, OR: 1.88; and Fazekas score: 3, OR 2.13; p < 0.001). Increasing severity of LA was associated with worse functional outcomes in both groups (ischemic stroke, OR: 1.49; p < 0.001 and ICH, OR: 1.36; p < 0.025).

Conclusion: In this study, LA was more severe and abundant in patients with ICH.

缺血性和出血性脑卒中白癫风严重程度比较:一项回顾性研究。
简介白细胞增多症(LA)是脑卒中患者常见的神经放射学症状。脑小血管疾病(SVD)是缺血性中风和出血性中风(脑内出血,ICH)的主要病因之一,也是导致白细胞增多症的主要原因。有大量证据表明,LA 可预测功能依赖和死亡风险。然而,目前还缺乏对缺血性卒中和出血性卒中 LA 严重程度差异的研究。因此,我们旨在比较两种中风亚群中 LA 的严重程度和丰度:研究纳入了 2006 年至 2020 年期间霍克兰大学医院神经内科收治的所有缺血性中风和脑内出血性(ICH)中风患者。我们从当地卒中登记处收集了患者的风险因素、临床和放射学检查结果及预后数据。我们使用基于 CT 成像的 Fazekas 评分来评估 LA 的存在和严重程度。我们使用卒中后 7 天的改良 Rankin 评分(mRS)对结果进行了评估:共有 5084 名患者参与了我们的分析:结果:共有 5084 名患者参与了我们的分析:4437 人(87%)患有缺血性中风,647 人(13%)患有 ICH。2476例(45%)患者存在LA。在我们的序数逻辑回归模型中,调整年龄、性别、已知高血压、已知糖尿病和吸烟后,与缺血性卒中患者相比,ICH 患者的 LA 更严重、更多(Fazekas 评分:1,OR:1.54;Fazekas 评分:2,OR:1.88;Fazekas 评分:3,OR:2.13;P P P 结论:在本研究中,LA 在 ICH 患者中更为严重,数量也更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信