Active piezoelectric bone conduction implant Osia® 2 - evaluation of surgery and one-year audiological and quality of life benefits.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Wojciech Gawęcki, Renata Gibasiewicz, Magdalena Błaszczyk, Małgorzata Wierzbicka, Ewelina Bartkowiak
{"title":"Active piezoelectric bone conduction implant Osia<sup>®</sup> 2 - evaluation of surgery and one-year audiological and quality of life benefits.","authors":"Wojciech Gawęcki, Renata Gibasiewicz, Magdalena Błaszczyk, Małgorzata Wierzbicka, Ewelina Bartkowiak","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-09057-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To present the surgical outcomes and one-year audiological and quality of life results of implantation of the Osia<sup>® </sup>2 active piezoelectric bone conduction implant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty adults with mixed and conductive hearing loss were implanted with the Osia<sup>®</sup> 2 system and followed up for at least one year. The surgical course, healing, and soft tissue condition were assessed. Audiometric tests included pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry and direct bone conduction measurements. Participants completed the APHAB and SSQ questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All surgeries were successful. No soft tissue problems were observed. Pure tone audiometry showed a mean functional gain of 47.4 ± 5.6 dB HL (p = 0.000089). The Polish Monosyllabic Word Test showed mean improvements for silent, medium and loud speech of 59.5 ± 1.8%, 46.5 ± 32.3% and 13.3 ± 20.9% in quiet and 38.5 ± 24.4%, 62.0 ± 9.1%, and 36.5 ± 34.4% in noise (all p < 0.05). The Polish Matrix Test indicated a mean SNR improvement of 8.78 ± 2.31 dB SPL (p = 0.000155). BC in situ measurements were significantly better post-implantation compared to preoperative levels with Baha<sup>® </sup>6 Max on the Softband. APHAB scores showed significant improvements in global, ease of communication, background noise and reverberation scores (all p < 0.001). SSQ scores improved significantly in speech, spatial and quality subscales (all p < 0.000001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Osia<sup>® </sup>2 implantation is an effective treatment for patients with mixed and conductive hearing loss. The surgery is relatively easy and safe, with no significant postoperative or magnet pressure-related complications. Osia<sup>® </sup>2 significantly improves speech understanding in noise and reduces communication problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-09057-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To present the surgical outcomes and one-year audiological and quality of life results of implantation of the Osia® 2 active piezoelectric bone conduction implant.

Methods: Twenty adults with mixed and conductive hearing loss were implanted with the Osia® 2 system and followed up for at least one year. The surgical course, healing, and soft tissue condition were assessed. Audiometric tests included pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry and direct bone conduction measurements. Participants completed the APHAB and SSQ questionnaires.

Results: All surgeries were successful. No soft tissue problems were observed. Pure tone audiometry showed a mean functional gain of 47.4 ± 5.6 dB HL (p = 0.000089). The Polish Monosyllabic Word Test showed mean improvements for silent, medium and loud speech of 59.5 ± 1.8%, 46.5 ± 32.3% and 13.3 ± 20.9% in quiet and 38.5 ± 24.4%, 62.0 ± 9.1%, and 36.5 ± 34.4% in noise (all p < 0.05). The Polish Matrix Test indicated a mean SNR improvement of 8.78 ± 2.31 dB SPL (p = 0.000155). BC in situ measurements were significantly better post-implantation compared to preoperative levels with Baha® 6 Max on the Softband. APHAB scores showed significant improvements in global, ease of communication, background noise and reverberation scores (all p < 0.001). SSQ scores improved significantly in speech, spatial and quality subscales (all p < 0.000001).

Conclusion: The Osia® 2 implantation is an effective treatment for patients with mixed and conductive hearing loss. The surgery is relatively easy and safe, with no significant postoperative or magnet pressure-related complications. Osia® 2 significantly improves speech understanding in noise and reduces communication problems.

有源压电骨传导植入体 Osia® 2 - 手术及一年听力和生活质量效益评估。
目的:介绍 Osia® 2 有源压电骨传导植入体的手术效果以及一年的听力和生活质量结果:方法:为 20 名患有混合性和传导性听力损失的成年人植入 Osia® 2 系统,并随访至少一年。对手术过程、愈合情况和软组织状况进行评估。听力测试包括纯音测听、言语测听和直接骨导测量。参与者填写了 APHAB 和 SSQ 问卷:结果:所有手术都很成功。结果:所有手术都很成功,没有发现软组织问题。纯音测听显示平均功能增益为 47.4 ± 5.6 dB HL (p = 0.000089)。波兰语单音节词测试显示,软带在安静、中等和大声讲话时的平均改善率分别为(59.5 ± 1.8%)、(46.5 ± 32.3%)和(13.3 ± 20.9%),在噪音中的平均改善率分别为(38.5 ± 24.4%)、(62.0 ± 9.1%)和(36.5 ± 34.4%)(所有 p ® 6 Max)。APHAB 评分显示,整体评分、沟通便利性评分、背景噪声评分和混响评分均有明显改善(均为 p ® 6):Osia® 2 植入术是治疗混合性和传导性听力损失患者的有效方法。手术相对简单、安全,术后无明显并发症或磁铁压力相关并发症。Osia® 2 能明显改善噪声中的言语理解能力,减少交流问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信