Safety and tolerability of losartan to treat recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa in children (REFLECT): an open-label, single-arm, phase 1/2 trial.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102900
Dimitra Kiritsi, Franziska Schauer, Stella Gewert, Katja Reineker, Antonia Reimer-Taschenbrecker, Agnes Schwieger-Briel, Hagen Ott, Claudia Schmoor, Olga Grishina, Dedee Murrell, Brigitte Stiller, Tobias Zahn, Alexander Nyström, Leena Bruckner-Tuderman
{"title":"Safety and tolerability of losartan to treat recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa in children (REFLECT): an open-label, single-arm, phase 1/2 trial.","authors":"Dimitra Kiritsi, Franziska Schauer, Stella Gewert, Katja Reineker, Antonia Reimer-Taschenbrecker, Agnes Schwieger-Briel, Hagen Ott, Claudia Schmoor, Olga Grishina, Dedee Murrell, Brigitte Stiller, Tobias Zahn, Alexander Nyström, Leena Bruckner-Tuderman","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a skin fragility disorder characterised by life-long mechanically induced skin blistering, fibrosis-driven pseudosyndactyly, and multi-organ involvement. Preclinical studies have suggested mitigated progression by angiotensin II type I receptor blockade through losartan. We aimed to determine the safety and tolerability of systemic losartan treatment among children with RDEB, and to obtain initial data on its clinical benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an open-label, single-arm, phase 1/2 trial at the Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Germany. Children with molecularly-confirmed RDEB, aged 2-16 years (starting from the 25th month of life) were eligible. Key exclusion criteria comprised anaemia with haemoglobin <8 g/dl; hypotension (defined as age-related systolic blood pressure under the 5th percentile); cardiologic contraindications, requirement for any medications that are likely to cause interactions with losartan; renal artery stenosis or renal insufficiency with creatinine clearance <30 ml/min; severe liver failure; severe, untreated electrolyte disturbances; history of cancer or chronic viral infections; hypersensitivity to losartan or any of the excipients and known or persistent abuse of medication, drugs, or alcohol. Treatment duration with losartan comprised 10 months, encompassing 16 weeks up-dosing of losartan, 24 weeks full dose losartan (final target dose of 1.4 mg/kg), and 4 weeks losartan tapering, followed by 12 weeks follow-up without losartan. The primary endpoint was occurrence of a serious safety concern, defined as one of the following side effects of losartan: clinically relevant severe hypotension, immediate hypersensitivity reactions to the drug or clinical relevant severe hypo- and hyperkalaemia. EB-specific scores (the EBDASI activity and damage score, Birmingham Epidermolysis Bullosa Severity Score (BEBS)) and other clinical outcome parameters were evaluated at five clinical visits as secondary outcomes: pain (Wong-Baker FACES Scale for pain), quality of life (Quality Of Life in EB [QOLEB] questionnaire and Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index [CDLQI]), itch (Itch Assessment Scale for the Paediatric Burn Patients), dysphagia (Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire-day 30 [MDQ-30]), pseudosyndactyly progression (our own morphometric scoring instrument), and hand function (Score of Colville and Terrill). All analyses (safety and efficacy) were performed in the safety population, defined as participants who received at least one dose of trial medication with losartan. This trial is registered with EudraCT, 2015-003670-32.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Jul 28, 2017, and Feb 12, 2021, 29 children were enrolled. Of those 27 received the full treatment. Losartan was well tolerated, no treatment-related severe complications leading to a serious safety concern occurred. The patients revealed improvement in the RDEB clinical scores, namely a mean reduction at week 40 of -7.36 points (95%-CI: -16.13 to 1.41) in the EBDASI activity score and -10.50 points (95%-CI: -20.81 to -0.19) in the EBDASI damage score, while the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index rose by 2.64 points (95%-CI: -4.55 to -0.90). Similar to the EBDASI score, the BEBS showed a mean reduction of -3 points, 95%-CI: -0.21 to -5,79, P = 0.036). In the Wong-Baker FACES Scale for Pain an improvement of at least one level was identified for 9 of 28 patients between baseline and at month 9 (95%-CI: 15.9%-52.4%; P = 0.57). Regarding the Quality of Life in EB Score, five of 28 patients showed an improvement in the total scale of at least one level at month 9 (95%-CI: 6.1%-36.9%; P = 0.71). With the Itch assessment scale for the paediatric burn patients an improvement of at least one level could be observed in 12 of 28 patients (95%-CI: 24.5%-62.8%; P = 0.24). The MDQ-30 showed no relevant difference at 9 months after treatment start, as compared to baseline. We observed improvement of finger span with our own morphometric scoring instrument of pseudosyndactyly progression, revealing an increase of the maximal distance between thumb and index finger at month 9 by 6.92 mm, 95%-CI [3.48, 10.37] P = 0.0009. With the Hand function assessment score of Colville and Terrill, an improvement of at least one level was documented for 3 of 28 patients, i.e., 10.7% (95%-CI: 2.3%-28.2%; P = 0.63).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our results suggest that losartan was well tolerated by children with RDEB, and provide preliminary evidence that it may reduce disease burden. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer durations is needed to establish the treatment's long-term efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Debra International, the Department of Dermatology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg (Berta-Ottenstein Advanced Clinician Scientist Program of the Medical Faculty), and the German Research Foundation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"77 ","pages":"102900"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102900","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a skin fragility disorder characterised by life-long mechanically induced skin blistering, fibrosis-driven pseudosyndactyly, and multi-organ involvement. Preclinical studies have suggested mitigated progression by angiotensin II type I receptor blockade through losartan. We aimed to determine the safety and tolerability of systemic losartan treatment among children with RDEB, and to obtain initial data on its clinical benefit.

Methods: We conducted an open-label, single-arm, phase 1/2 trial at the Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Germany. Children with molecularly-confirmed RDEB, aged 2-16 years (starting from the 25th month of life) were eligible. Key exclusion criteria comprised anaemia with haemoglobin <8 g/dl; hypotension (defined as age-related systolic blood pressure under the 5th percentile); cardiologic contraindications, requirement for any medications that are likely to cause interactions with losartan; renal artery stenosis or renal insufficiency with creatinine clearance <30 ml/min; severe liver failure; severe, untreated electrolyte disturbances; history of cancer or chronic viral infections; hypersensitivity to losartan or any of the excipients and known or persistent abuse of medication, drugs, or alcohol. Treatment duration with losartan comprised 10 months, encompassing 16 weeks up-dosing of losartan, 24 weeks full dose losartan (final target dose of 1.4 mg/kg), and 4 weeks losartan tapering, followed by 12 weeks follow-up without losartan. The primary endpoint was occurrence of a serious safety concern, defined as one of the following side effects of losartan: clinically relevant severe hypotension, immediate hypersensitivity reactions to the drug or clinical relevant severe hypo- and hyperkalaemia. EB-specific scores (the EBDASI activity and damage score, Birmingham Epidermolysis Bullosa Severity Score (BEBS)) and other clinical outcome parameters were evaluated at five clinical visits as secondary outcomes: pain (Wong-Baker FACES Scale for pain), quality of life (Quality Of Life in EB [QOLEB] questionnaire and Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index [CDLQI]), itch (Itch Assessment Scale for the Paediatric Burn Patients), dysphagia (Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire-day 30 [MDQ-30]), pseudosyndactyly progression (our own morphometric scoring instrument), and hand function (Score of Colville and Terrill). All analyses (safety and efficacy) were performed in the safety population, defined as participants who received at least one dose of trial medication with losartan. This trial is registered with EudraCT, 2015-003670-32.

Findings: Between Jul 28, 2017, and Feb 12, 2021, 29 children were enrolled. Of those 27 received the full treatment. Losartan was well tolerated, no treatment-related severe complications leading to a serious safety concern occurred. The patients revealed improvement in the RDEB clinical scores, namely a mean reduction at week 40 of -7.36 points (95%-CI: -16.13 to 1.41) in the EBDASI activity score and -10.50 points (95%-CI: -20.81 to -0.19) in the EBDASI damage score, while the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index rose by 2.64 points (95%-CI: -4.55 to -0.90). Similar to the EBDASI score, the BEBS showed a mean reduction of -3 points, 95%-CI: -0.21 to -5,79, P = 0.036). In the Wong-Baker FACES Scale for Pain an improvement of at least one level was identified for 9 of 28 patients between baseline and at month 9 (95%-CI: 15.9%-52.4%; P = 0.57). Regarding the Quality of Life in EB Score, five of 28 patients showed an improvement in the total scale of at least one level at month 9 (95%-CI: 6.1%-36.9%; P = 0.71). With the Itch assessment scale for the paediatric burn patients an improvement of at least one level could be observed in 12 of 28 patients (95%-CI: 24.5%-62.8%; P = 0.24). The MDQ-30 showed no relevant difference at 9 months after treatment start, as compared to baseline. We observed improvement of finger span with our own morphometric scoring instrument of pseudosyndactyly progression, revealing an increase of the maximal distance between thumb and index finger at month 9 by 6.92 mm, 95%-CI [3.48, 10.37] P = 0.0009. With the Hand function assessment score of Colville and Terrill, an improvement of at least one level was documented for 3 of 28 patients, i.e., 10.7% (95%-CI: 2.3%-28.2%; P = 0.63).

Interpretation: Our results suggest that losartan was well tolerated by children with RDEB, and provide preliminary evidence that it may reduce disease burden. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer durations is needed to establish the treatment's long-term efficacy and safety.

Funding: Debra International, the Department of Dermatology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg (Berta-Ottenstein Advanced Clinician Scientist Program of the Medical Faculty), and the German Research Foundation.

洛沙坦治疗儿童隐性萎缩性表皮松解症的安全性和耐受性(REFLECT):一项开放标签、单臂、1/2 期试验。
背景:隐性萎缩性表皮松解症(RDEB)是一种皮肤脆性疾病,其特征是终生机械性皮肤水疱、纤维化驱动的假性挛缩和多器官受累。临床前研究表明,通过洛沙坦阻断血管紧张素 II I 型受体可减轻病情发展。我们旨在确定RDEB患儿接受全身性洛沙坦治疗的安全性和耐受性,并获得其临床益处的初步数据:我们在德国弗莱堡大学医学中心进行了一项开放标签、单臂、1/2 期试验。经分子确诊的RDEB患儿年龄在2-16岁(出生后第25个月起),均符合条件。主要排除标准包括血红蛋白结果为贫血:2017年7月28日至2021年2月12日期间,29名儿童入选。其中 27 人接受了全部治疗。患者对洛沙坦的耐受性良好,未出现导致严重安全问题的治疗相关严重并发症。患者的RDEB临床评分有所改善,即在第40周时,EBDASI活动评分平均降低了-7.36分(95%-CI:-16.13至1.41),EBDASI损害评分平均降低了-10.50分(95%-CI:-20.81至-0.19),而儿童皮肤病生活质量指数则上升了2.64分(95%-CI:-4.55至-0.90)。与 EBDASI 评分类似,BEBS 平均降低了 -3 分(95%-CI:-0.21 至 -5,79,P = 0.036)。在黄-贝克 FACES 疼痛量表(Wong-Baker FACES Scale for Pain)中,28 位患者中有 9 位在基线和第 9 个月之间至少提高了一个等级(95%-CI:15.9%-52.4%;P = 0.57)。在 EB 生活质量评分方面,28 位患者中有 5 位在第 9 个月时总分至少提高了一个等级(95%-CI:6.1%-36.9%;P = 0.71)。根据儿童烧伤患者瘙痒评估量表,28 名患者中有 12 人的瘙痒程度至少提高了一级(95%-CI:24.5%-62.8%;P = 0.24)。在治疗开始 9 个月后,MDQ-30 与基线相比没有出现相关差异。我们使用自己的假性拇趾发育迟缓形态计量评分工具观察到手指跨度有所改善,结果显示,第 9 个月时,拇指和食指之间的最大距离增加了 6.92 毫米,95%-CI [3.48, 10.37] P = 0.0009。根据科尔维尔和泰瑞尔的手部功能评估评分,28 名患者中有 3 人的手部功能至少提高了一个级别,占 10.7%(95%-CI:2.3%-28.2%;P = 0.63):我们的研究结果表明,RDEB 患儿对洛沙坦的耐受性良好,并提供了可能减轻疾病负担的初步证据。要确定该疗法的长期疗效和安全性,还需要进行样本量更大、持续时间更长的进一步研究:黛布拉国际公司、弗莱堡大学医学中心皮肤病学系(医学系贝尔塔-奥滕斯坦高级临床科学家项目)和德国研究基金会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信