Using Key Predictors in an SVM Model for Differentiating Spinal Fractures and Herniated Intervertebral Discs in Preoperative Anesthesia Evaluation.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shih-Ying Yang, Shih-Yen Hsu, Yi-Kai Su, Nan-Han Lu, Kuo-Ying Liu, Tai-Been Chen, Kon-Ning Chiu, Yung-Hui Huang, Li-Ren Yeh
{"title":"Using Key Predictors in an SVM Model for Differentiating Spinal Fractures and Herniated Intervertebral Discs in Preoperative Anesthesia Evaluation.","authors":"Shih-Ying Yang, Shih-Yen Hsu, Yi-Kai Su, Nan-Han Lu, Kuo-Ying Liu, Tai-Been Chen, Kon-Ning Chiu, Yung-Hui Huang, Li-Ren Yeh","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics14212456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Spinal conditions, such as fractures and herniated intervertebral discs (HIVDs), are often challenging to diagnose due to overlapping clinical symptoms and the difficulty in assessing their functional impact. Accurate differentiation between these conditions is crucial for effective treatment, particularly in the context of preoperative anesthesia evaluation, where understanding the underlying condition can influence anesthesia planning and pain management. <b>Methods and Materials:</b> This study presents a Support Vector Machine (SVM) model designed to distinguish between spinal fractures and HIVDs using key clinical predictors, including age, gender, preoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, and the number of spinal fractures. A retrospective analysis was conducted on a dataset of 199 patients diagnosed with these conditions. The SVM model, using a radial basis function (RBF) kernel, classified the conditions based on the selected predictors. Model performance was evaluated using precision, recall, accuracy, and the Kappa index, with Leave-One-Out (LOO) cross-validation applied to ensure robust results. <b>Results:</b> The SVM model achieved a precision of 92.1% for fracture cases and 91.2% for HIVDs, with recall rates of 98.1% for fractures and 70.5% for HIVDs. The overall accuracy was 92%, and the Kappa index was 0.76, indicating substantial agreement. The analysis revealed that age and VAS pain scores were the most critical predictors for accurately diagnosing these conditions. <b>Conclusions:</b> These results highlight the potential of the SVM model with an RBF kernel to reliably differentiate between spinal fractures and HIVDs using routine clinical data. Future work could enhance model performance by incorporating additional clinical parameters relevant to preoperative anesthesia evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"14 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212456","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Spinal conditions, such as fractures and herniated intervertebral discs (HIVDs), are often challenging to diagnose due to overlapping clinical symptoms and the difficulty in assessing their functional impact. Accurate differentiation between these conditions is crucial for effective treatment, particularly in the context of preoperative anesthesia evaluation, where understanding the underlying condition can influence anesthesia planning and pain management. Methods and Materials: This study presents a Support Vector Machine (SVM) model designed to distinguish between spinal fractures and HIVDs using key clinical predictors, including age, gender, preoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, and the number of spinal fractures. A retrospective analysis was conducted on a dataset of 199 patients diagnosed with these conditions. The SVM model, using a radial basis function (RBF) kernel, classified the conditions based on the selected predictors. Model performance was evaluated using precision, recall, accuracy, and the Kappa index, with Leave-One-Out (LOO) cross-validation applied to ensure robust results. Results: The SVM model achieved a precision of 92.1% for fracture cases and 91.2% for HIVDs, with recall rates of 98.1% for fractures and 70.5% for HIVDs. The overall accuracy was 92%, and the Kappa index was 0.76, indicating substantial agreement. The analysis revealed that age and VAS pain scores were the most critical predictors for accurately diagnosing these conditions. Conclusions: These results highlight the potential of the SVM model with an RBF kernel to reliably differentiate between spinal fractures and HIVDs using routine clinical data. Future work could enhance model performance by incorporating additional clinical parameters relevant to preoperative anesthesia evaluation.

在术前麻醉评估中使用 SVM 模型中的关键预测因子区分脊柱骨折和椎间盘突出。
背景/目的:骨折和椎间盘突出症(HIVDs)等脊柱疾病往往因临床症状重叠和难以评估其功能影响而难以诊断。准确区分这些病症对有效治疗至关重要,尤其是在术前麻醉评估中,了解潜在病症可影响麻醉计划和疼痛管理。方法和材料:本研究提出了一种支持向量机(SVM)模型,旨在利用关键临床预测因素(包括年龄、性别、术前视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分和脊柱骨折次数)区分脊柱骨折和 HIVDs。我们对 199 名被诊断患有这些疾病的患者数据集进行了回顾性分析。SVM 模型使用径向基函数 (RBF) 内核,根据所选预测因子对病情进行分类。使用精确度、召回率、准确度和 Kappa 指数对模型性能进行了评估,并采用留空交叉验证(LOO)以确保结果的稳健性。结果SVM 模型对骨折病例的精确度为 92.1%,对 HIVD 的精确度为 91.2%,对骨折病例的召回率为 98.1%,对 HIVD 的召回率为 70.5%。总体准确率为 92%,Kappa 指数为 0.76,表明两者非常一致。分析表明,年龄和 VAS 疼痛评分是准确诊断这些疾病的最关键预测因素。结论:这些结果凸显了带有 RBF 核的 SVM 模型在利用常规临床数据可靠地区分脊柱骨折和 HIVD 方面的潜力。未来的工作可以通过纳入更多与术前麻醉评估相关的临床参数来提高模型的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信