Sex differences in survival following acute coronary syndrome with and without standard modifiable risk factors.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Vickram Vijay Anand, Jaycie Koh, Tobias Teo, Yip Han Chin, Rishabh Mahesh, Mark Y Chan, Gemma A Figtree, Nicholas W S Chew
{"title":"Sex differences in survival following acute coronary syndrome with and without standard modifiable risk factors.","authors":"Vickram Vijay Anand, Jaycie Koh, Tobias Teo, Yip Han Chin, Rishabh Mahesh, Mark Y Chan, Gemma A Figtree, Nicholas W S Chew","doi":"10.1007/s00392-024-02563-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This meta-analysis investigates the sex differences in mortality risk between the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) population without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRF-less) and those with at least one standard modifiable risk factor (SMuRF), and analyses mortality rates between males and females within the SMuRF-less cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for cohort studies with sex-stratified outcomes for SMuRF-less versus SMuRF patients with ACS till 15 December 2023. The analysis of variables reported in proportions was carried out by utilizing a meta-analysis with a generalized linear mixed model while continuous variables were analyzed by a meta-analysis of means, using an inverse variance method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies were included in the current paper, with 82,395 SMuRF-less ACS patients and 607,558 SMuRF ACS patients. Excess in-hospital mortality found in SMuRF-less ACS, compared to those with SMuRFs, were only observed in females (RR 1.56, 95%CI 1.08-2.25, p = 0.029), but not in males (RR 1.59, 95%CI 0.90-2.80, p = 0.088). On longer follow-up, the 1- and 2-year post-ACS mortality rates were similar across the SMuRF-less and SMuRF cohorts, for both sexes. The subgroup analysis of SMuRF-less ACS individuals revealed that SMuRF-less females had higher in-hospital (RR 1.52, 95%CI 1.30-1.78, p = 0.002), 1-year (RR 1.51, 95%CI 1.34-1.71, p = 0.005) and 2-year mortality risks (RR 1.40, 95%CI 1.13-1.75, p = 0.016) compared to the SMuRF-less male counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Paradoxical excess mortality in SMuRF-less ACS, compared to those with SMuRFs, was only observed in females. Females without cardiovascular risk factors are at the highest risk of short- and medium-term mortality following ACS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02563-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This meta-analysis investigates the sex differences in mortality risk between the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) population without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRF-less) and those with at least one standard modifiable risk factor (SMuRF), and analyses mortality rates between males and females within the SMuRF-less cohort.

Methods: The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for cohort studies with sex-stratified outcomes for SMuRF-less versus SMuRF patients with ACS till 15 December 2023. The analysis of variables reported in proportions was carried out by utilizing a meta-analysis with a generalized linear mixed model while continuous variables were analyzed by a meta-analysis of means, using an inverse variance method.

Results: Eight studies were included in the current paper, with 82,395 SMuRF-less ACS patients and 607,558 SMuRF ACS patients. Excess in-hospital mortality found in SMuRF-less ACS, compared to those with SMuRFs, were only observed in females (RR 1.56, 95%CI 1.08-2.25, p = 0.029), but not in males (RR 1.59, 95%CI 0.90-2.80, p = 0.088). On longer follow-up, the 1- and 2-year post-ACS mortality rates were similar across the SMuRF-less and SMuRF cohorts, for both sexes. The subgroup analysis of SMuRF-less ACS individuals revealed that SMuRF-less females had higher in-hospital (RR 1.52, 95%CI 1.30-1.78, p = 0.002), 1-year (RR 1.51, 95%CI 1.34-1.71, p = 0.005) and 2-year mortality risks (RR 1.40, 95%CI 1.13-1.75, p = 0.016) compared to the SMuRF-less male counterparts.

Conclusion: Paradoxical excess mortality in SMuRF-less ACS, compared to those with SMuRFs, was only observed in females. Females without cardiovascular risk factors are at the highest risk of short- and medium-term mortality following ACS.

存在和不存在标准可改变风险因素的急性冠状动脉综合征患者存活率的性别差异。
目的:本荟萃分析调查了无标准可改变风险因素(SMuRF-less)和至少有一个标准可改变风险因素(SMuRF)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者死亡率风险的性别差异,并分析了SMuRF-less队列中男性和女性的死亡率:在MEDLINE和Embase数据库中检索了截至2023年12月15日对无SMuRF和有SMuRF的ACS患者进行性别分层的队列研究。采用广义线性混合模型进行荟萃分析,对以比例报告的变量进行分析,同时采用逆方差法对连续变量进行均值荟萃分析:本文共纳入了八项研究,包括82 395例无SMuRF的ACS患者和607 558例SMuRF的ACS患者。与有SMuRFs的ACS患者相比,无SMuRF的ACS患者的院内死亡率仅在女性中观察到过高(RR 1.56,95%CI 1.08-2.25,p = 0.029),而在男性中未观察到过高(RR 1.59,95%CI 0.90-2.80,p = 0.088)。在较长时间的随访中,无SMuRF队列和SMuRF队列的男女ACS后1年和2年死亡率相似。对无SMuRF的ACS患者进行的亚组分析显示,与无SMuRF的男性患者相比,无SMuRF的女性患者的院内死亡率(RR 1.52,95%CI 1.30-1.78,p = 0.002)、1年死亡率(RR 1.51,95%CI 1.34-1.71,p = 0.005)和2年死亡率(RR 1.40,95%CI 1.13-1.75,p = 0.016)更高:结论:与有SMuRFs的ACS相比,无SMuRFs的ACS死亡率超常仅在女性中观察到。无心血管风险因素的女性在发生 ACS 后的短期和中期死亡率风险最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信