Reliability, validity and usability of the K-force® grip dynamometer to evaluate handgrip-strength in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Ingrid D van Iperen, Daphne Stegink, Barbara L Tempert-de Haan, Marleen Flim, Robert van der Stoep, Peter E Spronk
{"title":"Reliability, validity and usability of the K-force<sup>®</sup> grip dynamometer to evaluate handgrip-strength in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness.","authors":"Ingrid D van Iperen, Daphne Stegink, Barbara L Tempert-de Haan, Marleen Flim, Robert van der Stoep, Peter E Spronk","doi":"10.1177/02692155241295979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Handgrip dynamometry is recognised as a method for evaluating volitional muscle strength in the intensive care, but conventional handgrip dynamometers cannot accurately measure grip strength in very weak patients. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability, validity and usability of the K-force<sup>®</sup> grip in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Evaluation of measurement properties of the K-force<sup>®</sup> grip.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two Intensive Care Units in The Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients diagnosed with intensive care unit-acquired weakness according to a Medical Research Council sum score <48.</p><p><strong>Intervention & main measures: </strong>Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the K-force<sup>®</sup> grip were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Concurrent validity was examined using calibration weights. The usability was evaluated with the System Usability Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra-rater reliability showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.987 for the dominant hand and 0.972 for the non-dominant hand. Inter-rater reliability showed coefficients of 0.944 for the dominant hand and 0.942 for the non-dominant hand. There was a perfect correlation (<i>r</i> = 1) between the K-force® grip and the calibration weights. The usability of the K-force® grip was rated excellent by 11 healthcare professionals with a System Usability Scale score of 86.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The K-force<sup>®</sup> grip is a promising new tool for the evaluation of muscle strength in intensive care unit-acquired weakness patients who are too weak to use conventional hand dynamometers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155241295979"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241295979","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Handgrip dynamometry is recognised as a method for evaluating volitional muscle strength in the intensive care, but conventional handgrip dynamometers cannot accurately measure grip strength in very weak patients. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability, validity and usability of the K-force® grip in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness.

Design: Evaluation of measurement properties of the K-force® grip.

Setting: Two Intensive Care Units in The Netherlands.

Participants: Patients diagnosed with intensive care unit-acquired weakness according to a Medical Research Council sum score <48.

Intervention & main measures: Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the K-force® grip were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Concurrent validity was examined using calibration weights. The usability was evaluated with the System Usability Scale.

Results: Intra-rater reliability showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.987 for the dominant hand and 0.972 for the non-dominant hand. Inter-rater reliability showed coefficients of 0.944 for the dominant hand and 0.942 for the non-dominant hand. There was a perfect correlation (r = 1) between the K-force® grip and the calibration weights. The usability of the K-force® grip was rated excellent by 11 healthcare professionals with a System Usability Scale score of 86.

Conclusions: The K-force® grip is a promising new tool for the evaluation of muscle strength in intensive care unit-acquired weakness patients who are too weak to use conventional hand dynamometers.

用 K-force® 握力器评估重症监护室乏力患者手握强度的可靠性、有效性和可用性。
目的:手握力测定法被认为是重症监护中评估意志肌力的一种方法,但传统的手握力测定法无法准确测量非常虚弱的患者的握力。本研究旨在确定 K-force® 握力器在重症监护室乏力患者中的可靠性、有效性和可用性:设计:评估 K-force® 握力器的测量特性:环境: 荷兰两家重症监护病房:根据医学研究委员会的总分诊断为重症监护室获得性乏力的患者:使用类内相关系数评估K-force®握力器的内部和评分者之间的可靠性。同时有效性采用校准权重进行检验。使用系统可用性量表对可用性进行评估:评分者内部信度显示,惯用手的类内相关系数为 0.987,非惯用手的类内相关系数为 0.972。评分者之间的可靠性显示,优势手的相关系数为 0.944,非优势手的相关系数为 0.942。K-force® 握力器与校准砝码之间存在完美的相关性(r = 1)。11名专业医护人员对K-force®握把的可用性进行了评分,系统可用性量表得分为86.结论为 "优秀":结论:K-force®握力器是一种很有前途的新工具,可用于评估重症监护室因虚弱而无法使用传统手部测力计的患者的肌力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信