Using advanced machine learning algorithms to predict academic major completion: A cross-sectional study

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Alireza Kordbagheri , Mohammadreza Kordbagheri , Natalie Tayim , Abdulnaser Fakhrou , Mohammadreza Davoudi
{"title":"Using advanced machine learning algorithms to predict academic major completion: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Alireza Kordbagheri ,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Kordbagheri ,&nbsp;Natalie Tayim ,&nbsp;Abdulnaser Fakhrou ,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Davoudi","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Existing prediction methods for academic majors based on personality traits have notable gaps, including limited model complexity and generalizability.The current study aimed to utilize advanced Machine Learning (ML) algorithms with smoothing functions to predict academic majors completed based on personality subscales.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used reports from 59,413 individuals to perform the current study. All advanced algorithms implemented in this article were based on R software (version 4.1.3, R Core Team, 2021). All model parameters were optimized based on resampling and cross-validation (CV). In addition, pseudo-R<sup>2</sup> as a robust metric has been used to compare the performance of models, which, unlike most studies, considers the quality of model-predicted probabilities.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>The results indicated that advanced ML models' performance on training and test data was superior to logistic regression. Pseudo-R<sup>2</sup> and AUC results showed that advanced models such as kNN, GBE, and RF had the highest scores based on test data compared to other models. The pseudo-R<sup>2</sup> values for the models used in this study varied across the test dataset; the lowest value belonged to the logistic regression algorithm at .022, and the highest value was recorded for the kNN algorithm at .099. The agreeableness subscale is the most influential component in predicting the completion of university education, followed by conscientiousness and emotional stability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The potential of advanced methods to enhance the accuracy and validity of predictions is a promising development in our field. Their performance, particularly in handling large data sets with complex patterns, is a reason for optimism about the future of research in this area.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 109372"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482524014574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Existing prediction methods for academic majors based on personality traits have notable gaps, including limited model complexity and generalizability.The current study aimed to utilize advanced Machine Learning (ML) algorithms with smoothing functions to predict academic majors completed based on personality subscales.

Methods

We used reports from 59,413 individuals to perform the current study. All advanced algorithms implemented in this article were based on R software (version 4.1.3, R Core Team, 2021). All model parameters were optimized based on resampling and cross-validation (CV). In addition, pseudo-R2 as a robust metric has been used to compare the performance of models, which, unlike most studies, considers the quality of model-predicted probabilities.

Result

The results indicated that advanced ML models' performance on training and test data was superior to logistic regression. Pseudo-R2 and AUC results showed that advanced models such as kNN, GBE, and RF had the highest scores based on test data compared to other models. The pseudo-R2 values for the models used in this study varied across the test dataset; the lowest value belonged to the logistic regression algorithm at .022, and the highest value was recorded for the kNN algorithm at .099. The agreeableness subscale is the most influential component in predicting the completion of university education, followed by conscientiousness and emotional stability.

Conclusion

The potential of advanced methods to enhance the accuracy and validity of predictions is a promising development in our field. Their performance, particularly in handling large data sets with complex patterns, is a reason for optimism about the future of research in this area.
使用先进的机器学习算法预测学业专业完成情况:横断面研究
背景:本研究旨在利用先进的机器学习(ML)算法和平滑函数来预测基于人格分量表完成的学业专业:本研究使用了来自 59,413 人的报告。本文采用的所有高级算法均基于 R 软件(4.1.3 版,R 核心团队,2021 年)。所有模型参数都根据重采样和交叉验证(CV)进行了优化。此外,还使用了伪 R2 作为稳健指标来比较模型的性能,与大多数研究不同的是,伪 R2 考虑了模型预测概率的质量:结果:结果表明,高级 ML 模型在训练和测试数据上的表现优于逻辑回归。伪 R2 和 AUC 结果显示,与其他模型相比,kNN、GBE 和 RF 等高级模型在测试数据上的得分最高。本研究中使用的模型的伪 R2 值在整个测试数据集中各不相同;逻辑回归算法的伪 R2 值最低,为 0.022,而 kNN 算法的伪 R2 值最高,为 0.099。在预测完成大学教育方面,"合意性 "分量表的影响最大,其次是 "自觉性 "和 "情绪稳定性":先进方法在提高预测的准确性和有效性方面的潜力是我们这个领域的一个很有前途的发展。这些方法的性能,尤其是在处理具有复杂模式的大型数据集方面的性能,是我们对这一领域的研究前景持乐观态度的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信