Abbreviated Multiparametric MR Solution (the "Liver Triple Screen"), the Future of Non-Invasive MR Quantification of Liver Fat, Iron, and Fibrosis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Gavin Low, Ryan K W Chee, Yu Jun Wong, Puneeta Tandon, Florin Manolea, Stephanie Locas, Craig Ferguson, Wendy Tu, Mitchell P Wilson
{"title":"Abbreviated Multiparametric MR Solution (the \"Liver Triple Screen\"), the Future of Non-Invasive MR Quantification of Liver Fat, Iron, and Fibrosis.","authors":"Gavin Low, Ryan K W Chee, Yu Jun Wong, Puneeta Tandon, Florin Manolea, Stephanie Locas, Craig Ferguson, Wendy Tu, Mitchell P Wilson","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics14212373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> To review the findings of a multiparametric MRI (the \"liver triple screen\") solution for the non-invasive assessment of liver fat, iron, and fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective evaluation of all consecutive triple screen MRI cases was performed at our institution over the last 32 months. Relevant clinical, laboratory, and radiologic data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. <b>Results:</b> There were 268 patients, including 162 (60.4%) males and 106 (39.6%) females. The mean age was 54 ± 15.2 years (range 16 to 71 years). The most common cause of CLD was metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) at 45.5%. The most common referring physician group was Gastroenterology at 62.7%. In 23.9% of cases, the reason for ordering the MRI was a pre-existing failed or unreliable US elastography. There were 17 cases (6.3%) of MRI technical failure. Our analysis revealed liver fibrosis in 66% of patients, steatosis in 68.3%, and iron overload in 22.1%. Combined fibrosis and steatosis were seen in 28.7%, steatosis and iron overload in 16.8%, fibrosis and iron overload in 6%, and combined fibrosis, steatosis, and iron overload in 4.1%. A positive MEFIB index, a predictor of liver-related outcomes, was found in 57 (27.5%) of 207 patients. Incidental findings were found in 14.9% of all MRIs. <b>Conclusions:</b> The liver triple screen MRI is an effective tool for evaluating liver fat, iron, and fibrosis in patients with CLD. It provides essential clinical information and can help identify MASLD patients at risk for liver-related outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"14 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To review the findings of a multiparametric MRI (the "liver triple screen") solution for the non-invasive assessment of liver fat, iron, and fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Methods: A retrospective evaluation of all consecutive triple screen MRI cases was performed at our institution over the last 32 months. Relevant clinical, laboratory, and radiologic data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: There were 268 patients, including 162 (60.4%) males and 106 (39.6%) females. The mean age was 54 ± 15.2 years (range 16 to 71 years). The most common cause of CLD was metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) at 45.5%. The most common referring physician group was Gastroenterology at 62.7%. In 23.9% of cases, the reason for ordering the MRI was a pre-existing failed or unreliable US elastography. There were 17 cases (6.3%) of MRI technical failure. Our analysis revealed liver fibrosis in 66% of patients, steatosis in 68.3%, and iron overload in 22.1%. Combined fibrosis and steatosis were seen in 28.7%, steatosis and iron overload in 16.8%, fibrosis and iron overload in 6%, and combined fibrosis, steatosis, and iron overload in 4.1%. A positive MEFIB index, a predictor of liver-related outcomes, was found in 57 (27.5%) of 207 patients. Incidental findings were found in 14.9% of all MRIs. Conclusions: The liver triple screen MRI is an effective tool for evaluating liver fat, iron, and fibrosis in patients with CLD. It provides essential clinical information and can help identify MASLD patients at risk for liver-related outcomes.

简略多参数 MR 解决方案("肝脏三重筛查"),无创 MR 定量肝脏脂肪、铁和纤维化的未来。
背景/目的:回顾用于无创评估慢性肝病(CLD)患者肝脏脂肪、铁和纤维化的多参数磁共振成像("肝脏三重筛查")解决方案的研究结果。方法对我院过去 32 个月中所有连续的三重筛查 MRI 病例进行回顾性评估。采用描述性统计方法分析了相关的临床、实验室和放射学数据。结果:共有 268 例患者,其中男性 162 例(60.4%),女性 106 例(39.6%)。平均年龄为 54 ± 15.2 岁(16 至 71 岁不等)。CLD最常见的病因是代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD),占45.5%。最常见的转诊医生组是消化内科,占 62.7%。在 23.9% 的病例中,要求进行核磁共振成像的原因是原有的 US 弹性成像失败或不可靠。核磁共振成像技术失败的病例有17例(6.3%)。我们的分析显示,66%的患者出现肝纤维化,68.3%出现脂肪变性,22.1%出现铁超载。28.7%的患者合并有肝纤维化和脂肪变性,16.8%的患者合并有脂肪变性和铁超载,6%的患者合并有肝纤维化和铁超载,4.1%的患者合并有肝纤维化、脂肪变性和铁超载。在207名患者中,有57人(27.5%)的MEFIB指数呈阳性,这是预测肝脏相关结果的一个指标。在所有磁共振成像中,有14.9%的患者发现了意外发现。结论:肝脏三重筛查磁共振成像是评估CLD患者肝脏脂肪、铁和纤维化的有效工具。它提供了重要的临床信息,有助于识别有肝脏相关后果风险的 MASLD 患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信