Comparing the Effect of DOAC-Stop® and DOAC-Remove® on Apixaban, Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran Prior to Thrombophilia and Lupus Testing.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
British Journal of Biomedical Science Pub Date : 2024-10-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/bjbs.2024.13359
Noor-E-Huddah Malik, Andrew Ward, Beth Erskine
{"title":"Comparing the Effect of DOAC-Stop<sup>®</sup> and DOAC-Remove<sup>®</sup> on Apixaban, Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran Prior to Thrombophilia and Lupus Testing.","authors":"Noor-E-Huddah Malik, Andrew Ward, Beth Erskine","doi":"10.3389/bjbs.2024.13359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) interfere with coagulation assays potentially leading to inaccurate results. This study determined the effectiveness of DOAC-stop® and DOAC-remove® in overcoming DOAC interference. It aimed to investigate the extent to which apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran had an effect on thrombophilia and lupus tests using normal plasma, as well as whether DOACs interfere with true-positive results by testing abnormal controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Apixaban (0.03 mg/mL), rivaroxaban (0.01 mg/mL), and dabigatran (0.019 mg/mL) stock solutions were made and added to the normal pool at three different concentrations (200, 400 and 600 ng/mL) and to the abnormal controls at a single concentration. These samples and untreated DOAC controls were tested before and after adding either DOAC-stop® or DOAC-remove®. The measured parameters included protein C, protein S, antithrombin III (ATIII), DRVVS, DRVVC, PTT-LA and DOAC concentration. The normal pool spiked with DOAC was repeated seven times for each DOAC at each concentration level and the abnormal controls spiked with DOAC were repeated four times at a single concentration level for each DOAC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the normal pool, dabigatran and rivaroxaban affected all lupus anticoagulant tests, whereas apixaban only affected DRVVS and DRVVC. While dabigatran led to false-positive protein S deficiency and falsely elevated ATIII. Both DOAC-stop® and DOAC-remove® brought the thrombophilia results and all falsely elevated lupus anticoagulant results back within the normal range for apixaban and rivaroxaban. For dabigatran all the affected lupus anticoagulant tests remained abnormal following DOAC-remove®, unlike DOAC-stop® treatment, where only DRVVS and DRVVC at 600 ng/mL remained abnormal. In abnormal controls, all DOACs falsely elevated the lupus anticoagulant tests, whereas dabigatran caused false negative ATIII results, that were corrected (remained abnormal) with DOAC-stop® and DOAC-remove®. DOAC-stop® showed a greater reduction in lupus anticoagulant results than DOAC-remove®, causing a false-negative DRVVT ratio for rivaroxaban.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DOAC-stop® is more effective than DOAC-remove® in removing all DOACs below the reference range, whereas DOAC-remove® failed to remove dabigatran.</p>","PeriodicalId":9236,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","volume":"81 ","pages":"13359"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.13359","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) interfere with coagulation assays potentially leading to inaccurate results. This study determined the effectiveness of DOAC-stop® and DOAC-remove® in overcoming DOAC interference. It aimed to investigate the extent to which apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran had an effect on thrombophilia and lupus tests using normal plasma, as well as whether DOACs interfere with true-positive results by testing abnormal controls.

Methods: Apixaban (0.03 mg/mL), rivaroxaban (0.01 mg/mL), and dabigatran (0.019 mg/mL) stock solutions were made and added to the normal pool at three different concentrations (200, 400 and 600 ng/mL) and to the abnormal controls at a single concentration. These samples and untreated DOAC controls were tested before and after adding either DOAC-stop® or DOAC-remove®. The measured parameters included protein C, protein S, antithrombin III (ATIII), DRVVS, DRVVC, PTT-LA and DOAC concentration. The normal pool spiked with DOAC was repeated seven times for each DOAC at each concentration level and the abnormal controls spiked with DOAC were repeated four times at a single concentration level for each DOAC.

Results: In the normal pool, dabigatran and rivaroxaban affected all lupus anticoagulant tests, whereas apixaban only affected DRVVS and DRVVC. While dabigatran led to false-positive protein S deficiency and falsely elevated ATIII. Both DOAC-stop® and DOAC-remove® brought the thrombophilia results and all falsely elevated lupus anticoagulant results back within the normal range for apixaban and rivaroxaban. For dabigatran all the affected lupus anticoagulant tests remained abnormal following DOAC-remove®, unlike DOAC-stop® treatment, where only DRVVS and DRVVC at 600 ng/mL remained abnormal. In abnormal controls, all DOACs falsely elevated the lupus anticoagulant tests, whereas dabigatran caused false negative ATIII results, that were corrected (remained abnormal) with DOAC-stop® and DOAC-remove®. DOAC-stop® showed a greater reduction in lupus anticoagulant results than DOAC-remove®, causing a false-negative DRVVT ratio for rivaroxaban.

Conclusion: DOAC-stop® is more effective than DOAC-remove® in removing all DOACs below the reference range, whereas DOAC-remove® failed to remove dabigatran.

比较 DOAC-Stop® 和 DOAC-Remove® 在血栓性疾病和狼疮检测前对阿哌沙班、利伐沙班和达比加群的影响。
背景:直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)会干扰凝血测定,可能导致结果不准确。本研究确定了 DOAC-stop® 和 DOAC-remove® 在克服 DOAC 干扰方面的有效性。研究旨在调查阿哌沙班、利伐沙班和达比加群对使用正常血浆进行的血栓性疾病和狼疮检测的影响程度,以及 DOAC 是否会通过检测异常对照来干扰真正的阳性结果:制作阿哌沙班(0.03 毫克/毫升)、利伐沙班(0.01 毫克/毫升)和达比加群(0.019 毫克/毫升)储备溶液,以三种不同浓度(200、400 和 600 毫微克/毫升)加入正常血浆池,并以单一浓度加入异常对照组。在加入 DOAC-stop® 或 DOAC-remove® 之前和之后,对这些样本和未经处理的 DOAC 对照组进行测试。测量参数包括蛋白 C、蛋白 S、抗凝血酶 III (ATIII)、DRVVS、DRVVC、PTT-LA 和 DOAC 浓度。在正常池中添加 DOAC 后,每种 DOAC 在每个浓度水平上重复 7 次;在异常对照组中添加 DOAC 后,每种 DOAC 在一个浓度水平上重复 4 次:结果:在正常对照组中,达比加群和利伐沙班影响所有狼疮抗凝测试,而阿哌沙班仅影响DRVVS和DRVVC。达比加群会导致蛋白 S 缺乏假阳性和 ATIII 假性升高。对于阿哌沙班和利伐沙班,DOAC-stop®和DOAC-remove®都能使血栓性疾病结果和所有狼疮抗凝物假性升高结果恢复到正常范围内。对于达比加群,DOAC-remove®治疗后所有受影响的狼疮抗凝物检测结果仍不正常,这与DOAC-stop®治疗不同,在DOAC-stop®治疗中,只有DRVVS和600纳克/毫升的DRVVC仍不正常。在异常对照组中,所有 DOAC 都会使狼疮抗凝物检测值假性升高,而达比加群会导致 ATIII 检测结果假性阴性,但 DOAC-stop® 和 DOAC-remove® 均可纠正(保持异常)。与 DOAC-remove® 相比,DOAC-stop® 能更有效地降低狼疮抗凝物检测结果,从而导致利伐沙班的 DRVVT 比值出现假阴性:DOAC-stop®比DOAC-remove®更有效地去除所有低于参考范围的DOAC,而DOAC-remove®未能去除达比加群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Biomedical Science
British Journal of Biomedical Science 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Biomedical Science is committed to publishing high quality original research that represents a clear advance in the practice of biomedical science, and reviews that summarise recent advances in the field of biomedical science. The overall aim of the Journal is to provide a platform for the dissemination of new and innovative information on the diagnosis and management of disease that is valuable to the practicing laboratory scientist.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信