Risk factors and prognostic impact of new decompensated events in hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yan Lan, Yue Yu, Xiuding Zhang, Xianbin Xu, Xia Yu, Huilan Tu, Shaoheng Ye, Haoda Weng, Yu Shi, Jifang Sheng
{"title":"Risk factors and prognostic impact of new decompensated events in hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis.","authors":"Yan Lan, Yue Yu, Xiuding Zhang, Xianbin Xu, Xia Yu, Huilan Tu, Shaoheng Ye, Haoda Weng, Yu Shi, Jifang Sheng","doi":"10.1186/s12876-024-03494-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Decompensated cirrhosis (DC) is prone to recurrent episodes of decompensation following the initial event. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for subsequent decompensation and assess their impact on the outcomes of patients hospitalized for DC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with DC were divided into two groups based on the occurrence of new decompensated events during hospitalization. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors for new decompensation. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the relationship between new decompensation and short-term mortality risk in these patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 339 patients with DC, with a median age of 57 years. During hospitalization, 83 patients (24.5%) experienced new decompensated events, with bacterial infections (BIs) being the most common (n = 46, 13.6%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at admission (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11, P = 0.005) was the sole risk factor for new decompensation during hospitalization. Patients who experienced new decompensation had significantly higher 28-day (28.9% vs. 7.0%, P < 0.001) and 90-day (33.7% vs. 15.2%, P < 0.001) transplant-free mortality compared to those who did not. After adjusting for white cell count, C-reactive protein, and MELD score, new decompensation during hospitalization was identified as an independent risk factor for 28-day and 90-day mortality (HR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.42-4.87, P = 0.002 and HR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.04-2.88, P = 0.033, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with high MELD scores are susceptible to new decompensation during hospitalization, and the occurrence of new decompensation adversely affects short-term mortality in patients with DC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"24 1","pages":"408"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03494-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Decompensated cirrhosis (DC) is prone to recurrent episodes of decompensation following the initial event. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for subsequent decompensation and assess their impact on the outcomes of patients hospitalized for DC.

Methods: Patients with DC were divided into two groups based on the occurrence of new decompensated events during hospitalization. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors for new decompensation. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the relationship between new decompensation and short-term mortality risk in these patients.

Results: The study cohort consisted of 339 patients with DC, with a median age of 57 years. During hospitalization, 83 patients (24.5%) experienced new decompensated events, with bacterial infections (BIs) being the most common (n = 46, 13.6%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at admission (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11, P = 0.005) was the sole risk factor for new decompensation during hospitalization. Patients who experienced new decompensation had significantly higher 28-day (28.9% vs. 7.0%, P < 0.001) and 90-day (33.7% vs. 15.2%, P < 0.001) transplant-free mortality compared to those who did not. After adjusting for white cell count, C-reactive protein, and MELD score, new decompensation during hospitalization was identified as an independent risk factor for 28-day and 90-day mortality (HR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.42-4.87, P = 0.002 and HR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.04-2.88, P = 0.033, respectively).

Conclusions: Patients with high MELD scores are susceptible to new decompensation during hospitalization, and the occurrence of new decompensation adversely affects short-term mortality in patients with DC.

肝硬化失代偿期住院患者发生新的失代偿事件的风险因素和预后影响。
背景:失代偿性肝硬化(DC)在初次失代偿后容易反复发作。本研究旨在确定后续失代偿的风险因素,并评估其对肝硬化住院患者预后的影响:方法:根据住院期间新发生的失代偿事件将直流电患者分为两组。采用逻辑回归分析确定新的失代偿风险因素。采用 Cox 比例危险模型评估这些患者新的失代偿与短期死亡风险之间的关系:研究队列由 339 名 DC 患者组成,中位年龄为 57 岁。住院期间,83 名患者(24.5%)发生了新的失代偿事件,其中细菌感染(BIs)最为常见(n = 46,13.6%)。多变量分析显示,入院时的终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分(OR = 1.06,95% CI:1.02-1.11,P = 0.005)是住院期间出现新的失代偿的唯一风险因素。出现新的失代偿的患者在 28 天内的失代偿率明显更高(28.9% vs. 7.0%,P 结论:MELD 评分高的患者在 28 天内的失代偿率明显更高:MELD 评分高的患者在住院期间容易出现新的失代偿,而新的失代偿的发生会对 DC 患者的短期死亡率产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信