Social network interventions for dietary adherence among adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Halimatou Alaofè, Abidemi Okechukwu, Sarah Yeo, Jean D McClelland, Waliou Amoussa Hounkpatin, John Ehiri
{"title":"Social network interventions for dietary adherence among adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.","authors":"Halimatou Alaofè, Abidemi Okechukwu, Sarah Yeo, Jean D McClelland, Waliou Amoussa Hounkpatin, John Ehiri","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Optimal adherence to recommended diets is crucial to achieving long-term glycaemic control among individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) individuals. However, there is limited evidence on the effectiveness of interventions that target dietary adherence through social networks. Since social networks can influence individuals' health behaviours, it is important to thoroughly evaluate the impact of social network interventions on dietary adherence in adults with T2D. This systematic review protocol aimed to provide insights into future interventions and improve diabetes management strategies.</p><p><strong>Method and analysis: </strong>PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and Google Scholar will be searched from inception to December 2023 for relevant randomised and non-randomised controlled trials of at least 3 months' duration. In addition, studies that compared interventions involving the social networks (families, friends and peers) of adults with T2D with usual care, no intervention or an intervention with no explicit social network component will be included. Two reviewers will independently screen search outputs according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, critically evaluate the selected literature and extract data on the study setting, design, participants' characteristics, interventions, controls, social network functions and duration of follow-up, using a standard data extraction form. Quantitative data analysis will be performed where studies are homogeneous in characteristics and provide adequate outcome data for meta-analysis. Otherwise, data will be synthesised using narrative synthesis. Finally, trials will be assessed for bias risk and overall evidence certainty using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethical approval is not required for literature-based studies. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023441223.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11551984/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Optimal adherence to recommended diets is crucial to achieving long-term glycaemic control among individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) individuals. However, there is limited evidence on the effectiveness of interventions that target dietary adherence through social networks. Since social networks can influence individuals' health behaviours, it is important to thoroughly evaluate the impact of social network interventions on dietary adherence in adults with T2D. This systematic review protocol aimed to provide insights into future interventions and improve diabetes management strategies.

Method and analysis: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and Google Scholar will be searched from inception to December 2023 for relevant randomised and non-randomised controlled trials of at least 3 months' duration. In addition, studies that compared interventions involving the social networks (families, friends and peers) of adults with T2D with usual care, no intervention or an intervention with no explicit social network component will be included. Two reviewers will independently screen search outputs according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, critically evaluate the selected literature and extract data on the study setting, design, participants' characteristics, interventions, controls, social network functions and duration of follow-up, using a standard data extraction form. Quantitative data analysis will be performed where studies are homogeneous in characteristics and provide adequate outcome data for meta-analysis. Otherwise, data will be synthesised using narrative synthesis. Finally, trials will be assessed for bias risk and overall evidence certainty using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for literature-based studies. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.

Prospero registration number: CRD42023441223.

针对 2 型糖尿病成人患者饮食依从性的社交网络干预:系统综述和荟萃分析方案。
导言:2型糖尿病(T2D)患者要想长期控制血糖,就必须严格遵守推荐饮食。然而,通过社交网络针对饮食依从性进行干预的有效性证据有限。由于社交网络会影响个人的健康行为,因此全面评估社交网络干预措施对成年 T2D 患者饮食依从性的影响非常重要。本系统综述旨在为未来的干预措施提供见解,并改进糖尿病管理策略:将在 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL Complete、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、ProQuest Dissertations and Theses 和 Google Scholar 上检索从开始到 2023 年 12 月至少持续 3 个月的相关随机和非随机对照试验。此外,还将纳入将涉及 T2D 成人患者社交网络(家人、朋友和同伴)的干预措施与常规护理、无干预措施或无明确社交网络内容的干预措施进行比较的研究。两名审稿人将根据纳入和排除标准独立筛选检索结果,严格评估所选文献,并使用标准数据提取表提取有关研究环境、设计、参与者特征、干预措施、对照、社交网络功能和随访持续时间的数据。如果研究的特点相同,并能提供足够的结果数据进行荟萃分析,则将进行定量数据分析。否则,将使用叙事综合法对数据进行综合。最后,将使用建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)系统对试验的偏倚风险和总体证据确定性进行评估:基于文献的研究不需要伦理批准。研究结果将通过同行评审的出版物进行传播:CRD42023441223。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信