Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the breastfeeding self-efficacy scale to assess exclusive breastfeeding: a cross-sectional study in rural China.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Linhua Li, Zhengjie Cai, Xinru Zhou, Jieyuan Feng, Chang Sun, Yuju Wu, Scott Rozelle, Huan Zhou
{"title":"Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the breastfeeding self-efficacy scale to assess exclusive breastfeeding: a cross-sectional study in rural China.","authors":"Linhua Li, Zhengjie Cai, Xinru Zhou, Jieyuan Feng, Chang Sun, Yuju Wu, Scott Rozelle, Huan Zhou","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06948-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the benefits of exclusive breastfeeding, the proportion of exclusively breastfed children remains low in rural China. Self-efficacy is one of the most crucial modifiable factors predicting breastfeeding behavior. However, existing instruments in China do not specifically measure self-efficacy for exclusive breastfeeding but rather measure self-efficacy for any breastfeeding. Furthermore, they have been validated only in high-income Chinese settings. We sought to adapt and validate an instrument to measure exclusive breastfeeding self-efficacy within rural Chinese contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We introduced relevant items to Dennis' Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (BSES-SF), which can assess maternal self-efficacy for exclusive breastfeeding. It was then implemented in a multistage random cluster sampling design and cross-sectional survey with home-visit interviews among women 0-6 months postpartum (n = 654) in the rural areas of four counties in Sichuan, China. We performed item-total and adjusted item-total correlations, as well as exploratory factor analysis to remove redundant items and determine the latent factor structure. We further applied confirmatory factor analysis to test the dimensionality of the scale. We then assessed the reliability of the scale and conducted tests of predictive and divergent validity. Known group comparisons were made by primiparous status and breastfeeding support level. We compared the validated Exclusive Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale with the BSES-SF in terms of reliability and validity to explore the added value of scale modification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our modification of the BSES-SF to target exclusive breastfeeding produced 19 items. This was further reduced to 15 items based on adjusted item-total correlations and exploratory factor analysis, forming the Exclusive Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale. This scale had three dimensions: \"Breast milk supply and quality,\" \"Breastfeeding skills,\" and \"Exclusive breastfeeding\" subscales. The Exclusive Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale demonstrated strong internal consistency and overall reliability with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.91. Predictive and divergent validity and known group comparison assessments supported its validity. Robust psychometric evaluations demonstrated enhanced validity and reliability compared to the original BSES-SF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our Exclusive Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale is valid and reliable for measuring exclusive breastfeeding self-efficacy within rural Chinese contexts and is ready for adaptation and validation for clinical and programmatic use elsewhere, particularly within LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"24 1","pages":"749"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06948-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the benefits of exclusive breastfeeding, the proportion of exclusively breastfed children remains low in rural China. Self-efficacy is one of the most crucial modifiable factors predicting breastfeeding behavior. However, existing instruments in China do not specifically measure self-efficacy for exclusive breastfeeding but rather measure self-efficacy for any breastfeeding. Furthermore, they have been validated only in high-income Chinese settings. We sought to adapt and validate an instrument to measure exclusive breastfeeding self-efficacy within rural Chinese contexts.

Methods: We introduced relevant items to Dennis' Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (BSES-SF), which can assess maternal self-efficacy for exclusive breastfeeding. It was then implemented in a multistage random cluster sampling design and cross-sectional survey with home-visit interviews among women 0-6 months postpartum (n = 654) in the rural areas of four counties in Sichuan, China. We performed item-total and adjusted item-total correlations, as well as exploratory factor analysis to remove redundant items and determine the latent factor structure. We further applied confirmatory factor analysis to test the dimensionality of the scale. We then assessed the reliability of the scale and conducted tests of predictive and divergent validity. Known group comparisons were made by primiparous status and breastfeeding support level. We compared the validated Exclusive Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale with the BSES-SF in terms of reliability and validity to explore the added value of scale modification.

Results: Our modification of the BSES-SF to target exclusive breastfeeding produced 19 items. This was further reduced to 15 items based on adjusted item-total correlations and exploratory factor analysis, forming the Exclusive Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale. This scale had three dimensions: "Breast milk supply and quality," "Breastfeeding skills," and "Exclusive breastfeeding" subscales. The Exclusive Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale demonstrated strong internal consistency and overall reliability with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.91. Predictive and divergent validity and known group comparison assessments supported its validity. Robust psychometric evaluations demonstrated enhanced validity and reliability compared to the original BSES-SF.

Conclusions: Our Exclusive Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale is valid and reliable for measuring exclusive breastfeeding self-efficacy within rural Chinese contexts and is ready for adaptation and validation for clinical and programmatic use elsewhere, particularly within LMICs.

母乳喂养自我效能感量表的改编和心理测量学评估:一项在中国农村地区进行的横断面研究。
背景:尽管纯母乳喂养好处多多,但在中国农村地区,纯母乳喂养的儿童比例仍然很低。自我效能感是预测母乳喂养行为最关键的可调节因素之一。然而,中国现有的工具并不专门测量纯母乳喂养的自我效能感,而是测量任何母乳喂养的自我效能感。此外,这些工具仅在高收入的中国环境中进行过验证。我们试图在中国农村地区改编并验证一个测量纯母乳喂养自我效能感的工具:方法:我们引入了丹尼斯母乳喂养自我效能感量表-简表(BSES-SF)的相关项目,该量表可评估母亲纯母乳喂养的自我效能感。然后,我们采用多阶段随机整群抽样设计,对中国四川四县农村地区产后 0-6 个月的妇女(n = 654)进行了横断面调查和家访访谈。我们进行了项目-总相关和调整项目-总相关以及探索性因子分析,以去除冗余项目并确定潜在因子结构。我们还进一步应用了确认性因子分析来检验量表的维度。然后,我们对量表的可靠性进行了评估,并对预测效度和发散效度进行了测试。我们根据初产情况和母乳喂养支持水平对已知组别进行了比较。我们将经过验证的纯母乳喂养自我效能量表与 BSES-SF 在信度和效度方面进行了比较,以探讨量表修改的附加价值:结果:我们针对纯母乳喂养对 BSES-SF 进行了修改,共产生了 19 个项目。根据调整后的项目-总相关性和探索性因子分析,我们将其进一步缩减为 15 个项目,形成了纯母乳喂养自我效能量表。该量表有三个维度:"母乳供应和质量"、"母乳喂养技巧 "和 "纯母乳喂养 "三个分量表。排他性母乳喂养自我效能感量表的内部一致性和整体可靠性很强,Cronbach's alpha 系数为 0.91。预测效度和发散效度以及已知的小组比较评估均支持其有效性。与原始的 BSES-SF 相比,稳健的心理测量评估证明了其更高的有效性和可靠性:我们的纯母乳喂养自我效能量表在测量中国农村地区的纯母乳喂养自我效能方面是有效和可靠的,可以在其他地方,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家的临床和项目中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信