The 2-week wait pathway for suspected head and neck cancers in patients with throat and voice symptoms: referral patterns, common clinical practice and diagnostic efficacy of NICE guidelines.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
F A Chiumenti, A L Pendolino, F M Vaz, R C Dwivedi
{"title":"The 2-week wait pathway for suspected head and neck cancers in patients with throat and voice symptoms: referral patterns, common clinical practice and diagnostic efficacy of NICE guidelines.","authors":"F A Chiumenti, A L Pendolino, F M Vaz, R C Dwivedi","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 2-week wait (2ww) referral pathway has been introduced into UK clinical practice to increase the early detection of cancer and improve survivals. The efficiency of this system for head and neck (H&N) cancers has been questioned over the years because of evidence of low pick-up rates. H&N cancers present with a wide variety of non-specific symptoms, particularly throat and voice symptoms. These symptoms need to be accurately interpreted together with risk factors if they are to be addressed adequately and overload of cancer facilities avoided. One of the most common outcomes of H&N 2ww referrals is laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), a common condition that could be diagnosed and managed in the primary care setting with a prescription of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed a cohort of consecutive patients referred on the 2ww pathway for throat and voice symptoms at University College London Hospital H&N cancer clinic during two months in 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 patients (43.6% men, mean age 53.3 years) were included. Throat and voice symptoms were described as intermittent in 52.5% and non-lateralised in 88.1%. Diagnosis of LPR was made in 59.4% of the referrals. A PPI trial was prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) in only 7.9% of cases. The cancer pick-up rate in our cohort is 2.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An improved awareness of the symptoms of LPR could guide GPs to prescribe trials of PPIs in low-risk patients before rushing into a referral on a cancer pathway. This would improve the 2ww process on many levels, reduce the burden on the National Health Service and avoid patients' psychological distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The 2-week wait (2ww) referral pathway has been introduced into UK clinical practice to increase the early detection of cancer and improve survivals. The efficiency of this system for head and neck (H&N) cancers has been questioned over the years because of evidence of low pick-up rates. H&N cancers present with a wide variety of non-specific symptoms, particularly throat and voice symptoms. These symptoms need to be accurately interpreted together with risk factors if they are to be addressed adequately and overload of cancer facilities avoided. One of the most common outcomes of H&N 2ww referrals is laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), a common condition that could be diagnosed and managed in the primary care setting with a prescription of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) trials.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed a cohort of consecutive patients referred on the 2ww pathway for throat and voice symptoms at University College London Hospital H&N cancer clinic during two months in 2019.

Results: A total of 101 patients (43.6% men, mean age 53.3 years) were included. Throat and voice symptoms were described as intermittent in 52.5% and non-lateralised in 88.1%. Diagnosis of LPR was made in 59.4% of the referrals. A PPI trial was prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) in only 7.9% of cases. The cancer pick-up rate in our cohort is 2.9%.

Conclusions: An improved awareness of the symptoms of LPR could guide GPs to prescribe trials of PPIs in low-risk patients before rushing into a referral on a cancer pathway. This would improve the 2ww process on many levels, reduce the burden on the National Health Service and avoid patients' psychological distress.

咽喉和嗓音症状患者疑似头颈部癌症的 2 周等待路径:NICE 指南的转诊模式、常见临床实践和诊断效果。
简介英国在临床实践中引入了 2 周等待(2ww)转诊路径,以提高癌症的早期发现率并改善存活率。多年来,这一系统在头颈部(H&N)癌症方面的效率一直受到质疑,因为有证据表明该系统的接诊率很低。头颈部癌症表现出多种非特异性症状,尤其是咽喉和嗓音症状。这些症状需要与风险因素一起得到准确的解释,才能得到适当的处理,并避免癌症设施的超负荷运转。喉咽反流(LPR)是 H&N 2ww 转诊中最常见的结果之一,这种常见病可在初级医疗机构通过处方质子泵抑制剂(PPI)试验进行诊断和管理:我们对伦敦大学学院医院H&N癌症诊所在2019年两个月内因喉咙和嗓音症状转诊至2ww路径的连续患者进行了回顾性分析:共纳入101名患者(43.6%为男性,平均年龄53.3岁)。52.5%的患者的喉咙和嗓音症状为间歇性,88.1%的患者的喉咙和嗓音症状为非侧向性。59.4%的转诊者被诊断为 LPR。仅有 7.9% 的病例由全科医生(GPs)开具了 PPI 试验处方。我们队列中的癌症接诊率为 2.9%:结论:提高对 LPR 症状的认识可以指导全科医生在匆忙转诊癌症患者之前,为低风险患者开具 PPIs 试验处方。这将从多个层面改善 2ww 过程,减轻国民健康服务的负担,并避免患者的心理压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信