Five-Year Outcomes with Self-expanding versus Balloon-expandable TAVI in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Masaaki Nakase, Daijiro Tomii, Annette Maznyczka, Dik Heg, Taishi Okuno, Daryoush Samim, Stefan Stortecky, Jonas Lanz, David Reineke, Stephan Windecker, Thomas Pilgrim
{"title":"Five-Year Outcomes with Self-expanding versus Balloon-expandable TAVI in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction.","authors":"Masaaki Nakase, Daijiro Tomii, Annette Maznyczka, Dik Heg, Taishi Okuno, Daryoush Samim, Stefan Stortecky, Jonas Lanz, David Reineke, Stephan Windecker, Thomas Pilgrim","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The importance of transcatheter heart valve (THV) design on clinical outcome in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to compare 5-year outcomes of patients with severe AS and reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF), undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with balloon-expandable vs. self-expanding THVs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective analysis from the Bern TAVI registry, patients with LVEF <50% who underwent TAVI with either balloon-expandable or self-expanding THVs were included. A 1:1 propensity-score matching was performed to account for baseline differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 759 patients were included between August 2007 and December 2022, and propensity-score matching resulted in 134 pairs. Technical success was achieved in over 85% of patients, and was similar in both groups. Self-expanding THVs were associated with a lower mean transvalvular gradient (7.1 ± 3.7 mmHg vs. 9.9 ± 4.3 mmHg; P <0.001) and a higher incidence of ≥mild-to-moderate paravalvular regurgitation (36.3% vs. 11.3%; P <0.001) compared to balloon-expandable THVs. At 5 years, patients treated with a self-expanding THV had higher all-cause mortality than those with a balloon-expandable THV (67.8% vs. 55.8%, HR<sub>adjusted</sub>: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.02-2.03; P = 0.037). There were no significant differences in other clinical outcomes up to 5 years between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the setting of LV systolic dysfunction, patients treated with a self-expanding THV had higher risk of 5-year mortality compared to patients treated with a balloon-expandable THV.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>https://www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov. NCT01368250.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The importance of transcatheter heart valve (THV) design on clinical outcome in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction remains unknown.

Objectives: We aimed to compare 5-year outcomes of patients with severe AS and reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF), undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with balloon-expandable vs. self-expanding THVs.

Methods: In a retrospective analysis from the Bern TAVI registry, patients with LVEF <50% who underwent TAVI with either balloon-expandable or self-expanding THVs were included. A 1:1 propensity-score matching was performed to account for baseline differences between groups.

Results: A total of 759 patients were included between August 2007 and December 2022, and propensity-score matching resulted in 134 pairs. Technical success was achieved in over 85% of patients, and was similar in both groups. Self-expanding THVs were associated with a lower mean transvalvular gradient (7.1 ± 3.7 mmHg vs. 9.9 ± 4.3 mmHg; P <0.001) and a higher incidence of ≥mild-to-moderate paravalvular regurgitation (36.3% vs. 11.3%; P <0.001) compared to balloon-expandable THVs. At 5 years, patients treated with a self-expanding THV had higher all-cause mortality than those with a balloon-expandable THV (67.8% vs. 55.8%, HRadjusted: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.02-2.03; P = 0.037). There were no significant differences in other clinical outcomes up to 5 years between groups.

Conclusions: In the setting of LV systolic dysfunction, patients treated with a self-expanding THV had higher risk of 5-year mortality compared to patients treated with a balloon-expandable THV.

Clinical trial registration: https://www.

Clinicaltrials: gov. NCT01368250.

左心室收缩功能障碍患者使用自膨式与球囊扩张式 TAVI 的五年疗效。
背景:经导管心脏瓣膜(THV)设计对主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)和左心室收缩功能障碍患者临床预后的重要性仍然未知:我们旨在比较重度主动脉瓣狭窄和左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低的患者接受球囊扩张型和自扩张型主动脉瓣经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的5年预后:方法:在伯尔尼 TAVI 登记处进行的一项回顾性分析中,纳入了 LVEF 低的患者:结果:2007 年 8 月至 2022 年 12 月间共纳入 759 例患者,通过倾向分数匹配得出 134 对患者。85%以上的患者获得了技术成功,两组患者的情况相似。自膨式 THV 与较低的平均跨瓣梯度相关(7.1 ± 3.7 mmHg vs. 9.9 ± 4.3 mmHg;P 调整值:1.44;95% CI:1.02-2.03;P = 0.037)。在长达5年的其他临床结果方面,两组之间没有明显差异:结论:在左心室收缩功能障碍的情况下,与接受球囊扩张型THV治疗的患者相比,接受自扩张型THV治疗的患者5年死亡风险更高。临床试验注册:https://www.Clinicaltrials: gov.NCT01368250。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信