Assessment of scale-up designs for a diameter-transformed fluidized bed reactor with MP-PIC simulation

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Yanyan Xie, Fei Li, Bona Lu, Youhao Xu, Wei Wang
{"title":"Assessment of scale-up designs for a diameter-transformed fluidized bed reactor with MP-PIC simulation","authors":"Yanyan Xie, Fei Li, Bona Lu, Youhao Xu, Wei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ces.2024.120904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scale-up has always been the bottleneck to the development of new industrial processes. This study aims to assess the scale-up effects of a diameter-transformed fluidized bed (DTFB) reactor through three-dimensional, multi-phase particle-in-cell (MP-PIC) simulation with the Energy-Minimization Multi-Scale (EMMS) drag and solid stress model. Four 3.5 Mt/a DTFB reactors are designed by scaling up a 1.2 Mt/a one with different scale-up schemes and simulated after validation. It is found the Glicksman’s rule shows the most similarity in solid concentration distribution to the benchmark case while the FixedOperation rule under-predicts the solid concentration, meaning that only keeping constant <em>U</em><sub>g</sub> and <em>G</em><sub>s</sub> cannot guarantee the same distribution of solid concentration when scaling up the fast fluidized bed. In addition, all four scale-up designs ensure the same gas velocity, yet they exhibit varying solid velocities throughout the scale-up process. A more rational scale-up rule is required for the elaborate reactor scale-up","PeriodicalId":271,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2024.120904","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scale-up has always been the bottleneck to the development of new industrial processes. This study aims to assess the scale-up effects of a diameter-transformed fluidized bed (DTFB) reactor through three-dimensional, multi-phase particle-in-cell (MP-PIC) simulation with the Energy-Minimization Multi-Scale (EMMS) drag and solid stress model. Four 3.5 Mt/a DTFB reactors are designed by scaling up a 1.2 Mt/a one with different scale-up schemes and simulated after validation. It is found the Glicksman’s rule shows the most similarity in solid concentration distribution to the benchmark case while the FixedOperation rule under-predicts the solid concentration, meaning that only keeping constant Ug and Gs cannot guarantee the same distribution of solid concentration when scaling up the fast fluidized bed. In addition, all four scale-up designs ensure the same gas velocity, yet they exhibit varying solid velocities throughout the scale-up process. A more rational scale-up rule is required for the elaborate reactor scale-up

Abstract Image

利用 MP-PIC 仿真评估直径变换流化床反应器的放大设计
扩大规模一直是开发新工业工艺的瓶颈。本研究旨在利用能量最小化多尺度(EMMS)阻力和固体应力模型,通过三维、多相颗粒池(MP-PIC)模拟,评估直径变换流化床(DTFB)反应器的放大效应。通过采用不同的放大方案将一个 120 万吨/年的 DTFB 反应器放大,设计了四个 350 万吨/年的 DTFB 反应器,并在验证后进行了模拟。结果发现,Glicksman 规则显示的固体浓度分布与基准情况最为相似,而固定操作规则对固体浓度的预测不足,这意味着在放大快速流化床时,仅保持 Ug 和 Gs 不变并不能保证固体浓度的相同分布。此外,所有四种放大设计都能确保相同的气体速度,但在整个放大过程中却表现出不同的固体速度。因此,需要一个更合理的放大规则来对反应器进行精细放大
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemical Engineering Science
Chemical Engineering Science 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
8.50%
发文量
1025
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Chemical engineering enables the transformation of natural resources and energy into useful products for society. It draws on and applies natural sciences, mathematics and economics, and has developed fundamental engineering science that underpins the discipline. Chemical Engineering Science (CES) has been publishing papers on the fundamentals of chemical engineering since 1951. CES is the platform where the most significant advances in the discipline have ever since been published. Chemical Engineering Science has accompanied and sustained chemical engineering through its development into the vibrant and broad scientific discipline it is today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信