The Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A Injection in Pelvic Floor Muscles in Chronic Pelvic Pain Patients: A Double-Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Melle A. Spruijt, Wenche M. Klerkx, Kim Notten, Hugo van Eijndhoven, Leonie Speksnijder, Manon H. Kerkhof, Kirsten B. Kluivers
{"title":"The Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A Injection in Pelvic Floor Muscles in Chronic Pelvic Pain Patients: A Double-Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial","authors":"Melle A. Spruijt,&nbsp;Wenche M. Klerkx,&nbsp;Kim Notten,&nbsp;Hugo van Eijndhoven,&nbsp;Leonie Speksnijder,&nbsp;Manon H. Kerkhof,&nbsp;Kirsten B. Kluivers","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.17991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of Botulinum Toxin A (BTA) injections versus placebo injections, combined with pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT), in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Randomised, double-blinded clinical trial (January 2020–April 2023).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>This multicentre study was conducted at four hospitals in the Netherlands.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population and Sample</h3>\n \n <p>Ninety-four women with CPP and increased pelvic floor muscle tone despite previous PFMT, were enrolled.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants received either BTA injections (100 units) or placebo injections into the pelvic floor muscle, followed by four PFMT sessions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcomes and Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Primary outcomes included the number of women with at least a 33% reduction in pain and those reporting (very) much improvement of their pain. Secondary outcomes covered quality of life and pelvic floor function. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks post-treatment. Mixed models for repeated measurements were used for analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A 33% reduction or more in average pain score was reported by 15 participants (33%) after BTA treatment and 9 participants (20%) after placebo treatment (odd ratio placebo/BTA 1.88; 95% CI 0.72–4.90, <i>p</i> = 0.19). In both groups, 8 women (17%) reported their improvement as (very) much better (odd ratio placebo/BTA 0.947; 95% CI 0.32–2.80, <i>p</i> = 0.92). Pelvic floor resting activity decreased significantly after BTA treatment compared to placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The results from this study do not support the use of BTA injections in the management of CPP in women.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 3","pages":"297-305"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.17991","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17991","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of Botulinum Toxin A (BTA) injections versus placebo injections, combined with pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT), in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).

Design

Randomised, double-blinded clinical trial (January 2020–April 2023).

Setting

This multicentre study was conducted at four hospitals in the Netherlands.

Population and Sample

Ninety-four women with CPP and increased pelvic floor muscle tone despite previous PFMT, were enrolled.

Methods

Participants received either BTA injections (100 units) or placebo injections into the pelvic floor muscle, followed by four PFMT sessions.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes included the number of women with at least a 33% reduction in pain and those reporting (very) much improvement of their pain. Secondary outcomes covered quality of life and pelvic floor function. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks post-treatment. Mixed models for repeated measurements were used for analysis.

Results

A 33% reduction or more in average pain score was reported by 15 participants (33%) after BTA treatment and 9 participants (20%) after placebo treatment (odd ratio placebo/BTA 1.88; 95% CI 0.72–4.90, p = 0.19). In both groups, 8 women (17%) reported their improvement as (very) much better (odd ratio placebo/BTA 0.947; 95% CI 0.32–2.80, p = 0.92). Pelvic floor resting activity decreased significantly after BTA treatment compared to placebo (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

The results from this study do not support the use of BTA injections in the management of CPP in women.

Abstract Image

慢性盆腔疼痛患者盆底肌肉注射肉毒杆菌毒素 A 的疗效:双盲随机对照试验
目的:评估和比较肉毒杆菌毒素 A (BTA) 注射与安慰剂注射以及盆底肌肉疗法 (PFMT) 在慢性盆腔痛 (CPP) 女性患者中的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信