Longitudinal analysis of culture of patient safety survey results in surgical departments.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2024-10-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2024.1419248
Logan R Butler, Shaian Lashani, Cody Mitchell, Jin H Ra, Caprice Greenberg, Lawrence B Marks, Thomas Ivester, Lukasz Mazur
{"title":"Longitudinal analysis of culture of patient safety survey results in surgical departments.","authors":"Logan R Butler, Shaian Lashani, Cody Mitchell, Jin H Ra, Caprice Greenberg, Lawrence B Marks, Thomas Ivester, Lukasz Mazur","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2024.1419248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a need for improved methodologies on how to longitudinally analyze, interpret and learn from the Surveys on Patient Safety Culture™ (SOPS), developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Typically, SOPS quantify results by the percentage of positive responses, but this approach may miss insights from neutral or negative feedback.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The SOPS were distributed every two years from 2011 to 2022 to all hospital staff at one academic institution from perioperative services. Differences between rates of \"positive\" and \"negative\" scores (\"Delta\"), and \"neutral\" responses over time were calculated. The coefficient of determination (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup>) was used to assess the correlation strength of the positive scores as the primary outcomes provided by the SOPS and Delta values over time. Finally, we evaluated patterns (crossing and converging [indicating \"worrisome\" patterns] vs. diverging [suggesting \"desirable\" pattern] vs. stable [suggesting \"neutral\" pattern]) of the longitudinal scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,035 responses were analyzed [51 and 40 survey items for SOPS v1 and v2 (2022 only), respectively]. Comparing the <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> values of the positive only scores to the Delta scores demonstrated a change in effect size for \"Nonpunitive Response to Error\" (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.290 vs. 0.420). Of the 13 specific categories measured through SOPS, plotting negative vs. positive values elucidated 2 crossing, 2 converging and 2 diverging patterns indicating both a decrease in positive responses and an increase in negative responses rather than neutral.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Longitudinal analysis of the SOPS using the directional measures, Delta and pattern trends can provide organizations with additional key insights regarding culture of patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"4 ","pages":"1419248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1419248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a need for improved methodologies on how to longitudinally analyze, interpret and learn from the Surveys on Patient Safety Culture™ (SOPS), developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Typically, SOPS quantify results by the percentage of positive responses, but this approach may miss insights from neutral or negative feedback.

Study design: The SOPS were distributed every two years from 2011 to 2022 to all hospital staff at one academic institution from perioperative services. Differences between rates of "positive" and "negative" scores ("Delta"), and "neutral" responses over time were calculated. The coefficient of determination (R 2) was used to assess the correlation strength of the positive scores as the primary outcomes provided by the SOPS and Delta values over time. Finally, we evaluated patterns (crossing and converging [indicating "worrisome" patterns] vs. diverging [suggesting "desirable" pattern] vs. stable [suggesting "neutral" pattern]) of the longitudinal scores.

Results: A total of 1,035 responses were analyzed [51 and 40 survey items for SOPS v1 and v2 (2022 only), respectively]. Comparing the R 2 values of the positive only scores to the Delta scores demonstrated a change in effect size for "Nonpunitive Response to Error" (R 2 = 0.290 vs. 0.420). Of the 13 specific categories measured through SOPS, plotting negative vs. positive values elucidated 2 crossing, 2 converging and 2 diverging patterns indicating both a decrease in positive responses and an increase in negative responses rather than neutral.

Conclusion: Longitudinal analysis of the SOPS using the directional measures, Delta and pattern trends can provide organizations with additional key insights regarding culture of patient safety.

外科部门患者安全文化调查结果的纵向分析。
背景:医疗保健研究与质量机构(AHRQ)制定了《患者安全文化调查™》(SOPS),目前需要改进方法,以便对其进行纵向分析、解释和学习。通常情况下,SOPS 以正面回答的百分比来量化结果,但这种方法可能会遗漏中性或负面反馈的见解:研究设计:从 2011 年到 2022 年,SOPS 每两年向一家学术机构围手术期服务的所有医院员工发放一次。研究计算了 "正面 "和 "负面 "得分率("Delta")之间的差异,以及 "中性 "反馈随时间的变化。决定系数(R 2)用于评估作为 SOPS 提供的主要结果的正面得分与 Delta 值随时间变化的相关性。最后,我们评估了纵向得分的模式(交叉和趋同[表明 "令人担忧 "的模式]与发散[表明 "理想 "的模式]与稳定[表明 "中性 "的模式]):共分析了 1,035 份答卷[SOPS v1 和 v2(仅 2022 年)的调查项目分别为 51 和 40]。将正向分数的 R 2 值与 Delta 分数的 R 2 值进行比较后发现,"对错误的非惩罚性反应 "的效应大小发生了变化(R 2 = 0.290 vs. 0.420)。在通过 SOPS 测定的 13 个具体类别中,负值与正值的对比图显示了 2 种交叉、2 种趋同和 2 种发散模式,表明积极反应减少,消极反应增加,而不是中性反应:结论:利用方向性测量、Delta 和模式趋势对 SOPS 进行纵向分析,可为组织提供有关患者安全文化的更多重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信