Statutory and policy-based eco-disaster risk reduction in SADC member states.

IF 1.3 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/jamba.v16i2.1799
Alfredo A Covele, Dewald van Niekerk, Dirk Cilliers
{"title":"Statutory and policy-based eco-disaster risk reduction in SADC member states.","authors":"Alfredo A Covele, Dewald van Niekerk, Dirk Cilliers","doi":"10.4102/jamba.v16i2.1799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective legislative framework is the cornerstone of managing hazards and disasters because they have become policy problems of global and local concern. This research study aims at understanding the implementation, strengths and gaps of policies related to Eco-DRR in SADC member states. In particular, attempts to critically analyse the making of DRM policies, as well as the variables underpinning these policies, given the high level of disaster losses. A literature survey was conducted to contextualise and conceptualise statutory and policy-based Eco-DRR. Academic literature on Eco-DRR and related policies, journal articles and related policies, official documents in SADC states including policies, acts, legislations, strategies, frameworks and plans were consulted. The analysis revealed that the Eco-DRR approaches have not yet been mainstreamed as part of standards of DRM in most of SADC member states, opting largely on ad hoc practice. Short-term plans and/or strategies don't help to articulate funding and programme priorities. In addition, irregular updating of policies in some member states and a lack of following up mechanisms were noted.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>To change this reality, it is necessary to include Eco-DRR in strategies and/or plans and to standardise ecosystem-based measures for reducing disaster risks. Additionally, there is an urgent need for empowerment of the existing institutions and creation of networks that are driven by SADC institutions. Overall, it is evident that there is a regional interest and demand to apply and standardise ecosystem-based approaches and natural or green infrastructure solutions toward Eco-DRR.</p>","PeriodicalId":51823,"journal":{"name":"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v16i2.1799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective legislative framework is the cornerstone of managing hazards and disasters because they have become policy problems of global and local concern. This research study aims at understanding the implementation, strengths and gaps of policies related to Eco-DRR in SADC member states. In particular, attempts to critically analyse the making of DRM policies, as well as the variables underpinning these policies, given the high level of disaster losses. A literature survey was conducted to contextualise and conceptualise statutory and policy-based Eco-DRR. Academic literature on Eco-DRR and related policies, journal articles and related policies, official documents in SADC states including policies, acts, legislations, strategies, frameworks and plans were consulted. The analysis revealed that the Eco-DRR approaches have not yet been mainstreamed as part of standards of DRM in most of SADC member states, opting largely on ad hoc practice. Short-term plans and/or strategies don't help to articulate funding and programme priorities. In addition, irregular updating of policies in some member states and a lack of following up mechanisms were noted.

Contribution: To change this reality, it is necessary to include Eco-DRR in strategies and/or plans and to standardise ecosystem-based measures for reducing disaster risks. Additionally, there is an urgent need for empowerment of the existing institutions and creation of networks that are driven by SADC institutions. Overall, it is evident that there is a regional interest and demand to apply and standardise ecosystem-based approaches and natural or green infrastructure solutions toward Eco-DRR.

南部非洲发展共同体成员国以法规和政策为基础减少生态灾害风险。
有效的立法框架是管理危害和灾害的基石,因为它们已成为全球和地方关注的政策问题。本研究旨在了解南部非洲发展共同体(SADC)成员国与生态-灾害风险管理(Eco-DRR)相关的政策的实施情况、优势和差距。特别是,鉴于灾害损失严重,本研究试图批判性地分析灾害风险管理政策的制定,以及支持这些政策的变量。我们进行了一项文献调查,以了解法定和政策性生态减灾的背景和概念。查阅了有关生态减灾和相关政策的学术文献、期刊论文和相关政策,以及南部非洲发展共同体国家的官方文件,包括政策、法案、立法、战略、框架和计划。分析结果表明,在南部非洲发展共同体的大多数成员国中,生态-减少灾害风险的方法尚未作为灾害风险管理标准的一部分纳入主流,而是主要选择临时性的做法。短期计划和/或战略无助于明确资金和计划的优先事项。此外,还注意到一些成员国不定期更新政策,并缺乏后续机制:贡献:为改变这一现状,有必要将生态-减少灾害风险纳入战略和/或计划中,并将基于生态系统的减少灾害风险措施标准化。此外,亟需增强现有机构的能力,建立由南部非洲发展共同体机构推动的网络。总之,该地区显然有兴趣和需求应用基于生态系统的方法和自然或绿色基础设施解决 方案,并使之标准化,以实现生态减灾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies
Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信