Influence of Cementation Strategies on the Incidence of Fiber Post Debonding in Root Canal Treated Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
P Pauletto, E Ruales-Carrera, R Sorrentino, T F Eyűboğlu, M Özcan
{"title":"Influence of Cementation Strategies on the Incidence of Fiber Post Debonding in Root Canal Treated Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"P Pauletto, E Ruales-Carrera, R Sorrentino, T F Eyűboğlu, M Özcan","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2679Pauletto15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the incidence of debonding of fiber posts in root canal-treated teeth with a focus on the cementation strategy employed. This study was registered at PROSPERO (sob number: CRD42022334791). Six databases were searched, in addition to the gray literature. Two independent reviewers performed the selection of the studies as well as data collection. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS (Quality in Prognosis Studies) tool. A meta-analysis was carried out to verify the overall incidence of debonding and the influence of different variables. Random effects were adopted, with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. Twentynine studies met the eligibility criteria. The overall incidence of debonding was 2.7% (CI: 2.1-3.6%). Similar debonding rates were found when using total-etch and self-adhesive systems while a trend towards a higher debonding rate was observed for self-etch systems. Posterior teeth presented a higher incidence of debonding (3.9%) (CI: 2.5-6.0%) than anterior teeth (1.6%) (CI: 1.0-2.5%). A higher debonding incidence was found when 2 or fewer coronal walls were reported at 3.5% (CI:2.0-5.9%). Debondings in fiber posts are multifactorial, with no direct cementation strategy influence.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2679Pauletto15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the incidence of debonding of fiber posts in root canal-treated teeth with a focus on the cementation strategy employed. This study was registered at PROSPERO (sob number: CRD42022334791). Six databases were searched, in addition to the gray literature. Two independent reviewers performed the selection of the studies as well as data collection. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS (Quality in Prognosis Studies) tool. A meta-analysis was carried out to verify the overall incidence of debonding and the influence of different variables. Random effects were adopted, with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. Twentynine studies met the eligibility criteria. The overall incidence of debonding was 2.7% (CI: 2.1-3.6%). Similar debonding rates were found when using total-etch and self-adhesive systems while a trend towards a higher debonding rate was observed for self-etch systems. Posterior teeth presented a higher incidence of debonding (3.9%) (CI: 2.5-6.0%) than anterior teeth (1.6%) (CI: 1.0-2.5%). A higher debonding incidence was found when 2 or fewer coronal walls were reported at 3.5% (CI:2.0-5.9%). Debondings in fiber posts are multifactorial, with no direct cementation strategy influence.

根管治疗牙齿时粘接策略对纤维桩脱粘发生率的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。
本系统综述旨在研究根管治疗牙纤维桩脱粘的发生率,重点关注所采用的粘接策略。本研究已在 PROSPERO 注册(注册号:CRD42022334791)。除灰色文献外,还检索了六个数据库。两名独立审稿人负责研究的筛选和数据收集。使用QUIPS(预后研究质量)工具评估了偏倚风险。为了验证脱钩的总体发生率和不同变量的影响,我们进行了一项荟萃分析。采用随机效应,置信区间 (CI) 为 95%。共有 29 项研究符合资格标准。脱钩的总发生率为 2.7%(CI:2.1-3.6%)。使用全酸蚀和自粘系统时,脱粘发生率相似,而自酸蚀系统的脱粘发生率呈上升趋势。后牙的脱粘发生率(3.9%)(CI:2.5-6.0%)高于前牙(1.6%)(CI:1.0-2.5%)。当冠状壁为 2 个或 2 个以下时,脱粘发生率较高,为 3.5%(CI:2.0-5.9%)。纤维桩的脱粘是多因素造成的,并不直接受粘接策略的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信